Colin M. Gray
ABSTRACT
There has been increasing interest in the work practices of user experience (UX) designers, particularly in relation to approaches that support adoption of human-centered principles in corporate environments. This paper addresses the ways in which UX designers conceive of methods that support their practice, and the methods they consider necessary as a baseline competency for beginning user experience designers. Interviews were conducted with practitioners in a range of companies, with differing levels of expertise and educational backgrounds represented. Interviewees were asked about their use of design methods in practice, and the methods they considered to be core of their practice; in addition, they were asked what set of methods would be vital for beginning designers joining their company. Based on these interviews, I evaluate practitioner conceptions of design methods, proposing an appropriation-oriented mindset that drives the use of tool knowledge, supporting designers' practice in a variety of corporate contexts. Opportunities are considered for future research in the study of UX practice and training of students in human-computer interaction programs.
Supplemental Material
- Tim Brown. 2008. Design thinking. Harvard Business Review. Retrieved August 1, 2015 from https://hbr.org/2008/06/design-thinkingGoogle Scholar
- Yen-ning Chang, Youn-kyung Lim, and Erik Stolterman. 2008. Personas: From theory to practices. In Proceedings of the 5th Nordic Conference on Human-computer Interaction: Building Bridges, 439--442. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1463160.1463214 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Gilbert Cockton and Alan Woolrych. 2002. Sale must end: should discount methods be cleared off HCI's shelves? Interactions, 9, 5: 13--18. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Marisa L. Cohn, Susan E., Sim and Paul Dourish. 2010. Design methods as discourse on practice. In Proceedings of the 16th ACM International Conference on Supporting Group Work (GROUP'10), 45--54. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1880071.1880079 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Robert Curedale. 2012. Design methods 1: 200 ways to apply design thinking. Design Community College, Topanga, CA.Google Scholar
- Daniel Fallman. 2003. Design-oriented human-computer interaction. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 225--232. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/642611.642652 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Anthony Faiola. 2007. The design enterprise: Rethinking the HCI education paradigm. Design Issues, 23, 3: 30--45.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Alain Findeli. 2001. Rethinking design education for the 21st century: Theoretical, methodological, and ethical discussion. Design Issues, 17, 1, 1: 5--17. http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/07479360152103796Google Scholar
- Erin Friess. 2012. Personas and decision making in the design process: an ethnographic case study. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI'12), 1209--1218. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2207676.2208572 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Per Galle. 2002. Philosophy of design: An editorial introduction. Design Studies, 23, 3: 211--218. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0142--694X(01)00034--5Google ScholarCross Ref
- Barney G. Glaser and Anselm L. Strauss. 1967. The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Alpine de Gruyter, NY.Google Scholar
- Gabriela Goldschmidt. 2003. The backtalk of selfgenerated sketches. Design Issues, 19, 1: 72--88.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Elizabeth S. Goodman. 2013. Delivering design: Performance and materiality in professional interaction design. Doctoral dissertation, University of California.Google Scholar
- Elizabeth Goodman, Erik Stolterman, and Ron Wakkary. 2011. Understanding interaction design practices. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI'11), 1061--1070. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1978942.1979100 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Colin M. Gray. 2014. Evolution of design competence in UX practice. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI'14), 1645--2654. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2556288.2557264 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Colin M. Gray, Erik Stolterman, and Martin A. Siegel. 2014. Reprioritizing the relationship Between HCI research and practice: Bubble-up and trickle-down effects. In Proceedings of the 2014 conference on Designing Interactive Systems (DIS'14), 725--734. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2598510.2598595 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Colin M. Gray, Austin Toombs, and Shad Gross. 2015. Flow of competence in UX design practice. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (CHI'15), 3285--3294. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2702123.2702579 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Bruce Hanington. 2003. Methods in the making: A perspective on the state of human research in design. Design Issues, 19, 4: 9--18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1162%2f074793603322545019Google ScholarCross Ref
- Bruce Hanington and Bella Martin. 2012. Universal methods of design: 100 ways to research complex problems, develop innovative ideas, and design effective solutions. Rockport Publishers, Beverly, MA.Google Scholar
- Steven Harrison, Maribeth Back, and Deborah Tatar. 2006. "It's just a method!": A pedagogical experiment in interdisciplinary design. In Proceedings of the 6th conference on Designing Interactive Systems (DIS'06), 261--270. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1142405.1142445 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kristina Höök, Peter Dalsgaard, Stuart Reeves, Jeffrey Bardzell, Jonas Löwgren, and Erik Stolterman, Yvonne Rogers. Knowledge Production in Interaction Design. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA'15), 2429--2432. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2702613.2702653 Google ScholarDigital Library
- John C. Jones. 1970. Design Methods. Wiley Interscience, London, UK.Google Scholar
- Vijay Kumar. 2013. 101 design methods: A structured approach for driving innovation in your organization. Wiley, Hoboken, NJ.Google Scholar
- Carine E. Lallemand. 2015. Towards consolidated methods for the design and evaluation of user experience. Doctoral dissertation, University of Luxembourg.Google Scholar
- Bryan Lawson. 2004. Schemata, gambits and precedent: Some factors in design expertise. Design Studies, 25, 5: 443--457. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2004.05.001Google ScholarCross Ref
- Bryan Lawson. 2006. How designers think: the design process demystified. Architectural Press, Oxford, UK.Google Scholar
- Bryan Lawson and Kees Dorst. 2009. Design expertise. Architectural Press, Oxford, UK.Google Scholar
- Jung-Joo Lee, Kirsikka Vaajakallio, and Tuuli Mattelmäki. 2011. Tracing situated effects of innovative design methods: Inexperienced designers' practices. In Proceedings of the Second Conference on Creativity and Innovation in Design (DESIRE'11), 103--113. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2079216.2079231 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jonas Löwgren and Erik Stolterman. 1999. Methods & tools: Design methodology and design practice. interactions, 6, 1: 13--20. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Tara Matthews, Tejinder Judge, and Steve Whittaker. 2012. How do designers and user experience professionals actually perceive and use personas? In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI'12), 1219--1228. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2207676.2208573 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Tara Mullaney and Erik Stolterman. 2014. Why 'design research practice' is not design as we know it. In Proceedings of the Design Research Society Conference (DRS'14). Retrieved from http://www.drs2014.org/media/654248/0266-file1.pdfGoogle Scholar
- Harold G. Nelson and Erik Stolterman. 2012. The design way: Intentional change in an unpredictable world. MIT Press, Cambridge, UK. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Donald A. Norman. 2010. The research-practice gap. interactions, 17, 4: 9--12. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1806491.1806494Google Scholar
- Liza Potts and Gerianna Bartocci. 2009. "Experience Design". In Proceedings of the 27th ACM International Conference on Design of Communication (SIGDOC'09), 17--22. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1621995.1621999 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Michael Polanyi. 1966. The tacit dimension. Anchor Books, Garden City, NY.Google Scholar
- Horst Rittel. 1984. Second-generation design methods. In Developments in Design Methodology, Nigel Cross (ed.). Chichester, NY, NY, 317--327.Google Scholar
- Oliver C. Robinson. 2014. Sampling in interview-based qualitative research: A theoretical and practical guide. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 11, 1: 25--41. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2013.801543Google ScholarCross Ref
- David J. Roedl and Erik Stolterman. 2013. Design research at CHI and its applicability to design practice. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI'13), 1951--1954. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2470654.2466257 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Yvonne Rogers. 2004. New theoretical approaches for HCI. Annual review of information science and technology, 38, 1: 87--143.Google Scholar
- James Self, Seong-geun Lee, and Hyeonseok Bang. 2015. Perceptions of complexity in design representation: Implications for an understanding of design practice. The International Journal of Design Management and Professional Practice, 9, 4: 33--46.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Paula A. Silva and Janet C. Read. 2010. A methodology to evaluate creative design methods: A study with the BadIdeas method. In Proceedings of the 22nd Conference of the Computer-Human Interaction Special Interest Group of Australia on Computer-Human Interaction, 264--271. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1952222.1952279 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Erik Stolterman. 2008. The nature of design practice and implications for interaction design research. International Journal of Design, 2, 1: 55--65.Google Scholar
- Erik Stolterman, Jamie McAtee, David Royer, and Selvan Thandapani. 2008. Designerly tools. In Proceedings of Undisciplined! Design Research Society Conference 2008, Sheffield Hallam University, 116: 114. Retrieved from http://shura.shu.ac.uk/491/Google Scholar
- Erik Stolterman and James Pierce. 2012. Design tools in practice: studying the designer-tool relationship in interaction design. In Proceedings of the Designing Interactive Systems Conference (DIS'12), 25--28. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2317956.2317961 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Hogeschool Technische. 2013. Delft Design Guide: Design Strategies and Methods. Uitgeverij Bis, Amsterdam, NL.Google Scholar
- Nicholas True, Jeroen Peeters, and Daniel Fallman. 2013. Confabulation in the time of transdisciplinarity: Reflection on HCI education and a call for conversation." In Human-Computer Interaction. Human-Centred Design Approaches, Methods, Tools, and Environments. Berlin, DE, Springer, 128--136. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978--3--642--39232-0_15 Google ScholarDigital Library
- I. M. Verstijnen, J. M. Hennessey, C. van Leeuwen, R. Hamel, and G. Goldschmidt. 1998. Sketching and creative discovery. Design Studies, 19, 4: 519--546.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Alan Woolrych, Kasper Hornbæk, Erik Frøkjær, and Gilbert Cockton. 2011. Ingredients and meals rather than recipes: A proposal for research that does not treat usability evaluation methods as indivisible wholes. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 27, 10: 940--970.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Indi Young. 2008. Mental models: aligning design strategy with human behavior. Rosenfeld Media, Brooklyn, NY. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Xiao Zhang, and Ron Wakkary. 2014. Understanding the role of designers' personal experiences in interaction design practice. In Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (DIS'14), 895--904. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2598510.2598556 Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- "It's More of a Mindset Than a Method": UX Practitioners' Conception of Design Methods
Recommendations
The Dark (Patterns) Side of UX Design
CHI '18: Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsInterest in critical scholarship that engages with the complexity of user experience (UX) practice is rapidly expanding, yet the vocabulary for describing and assessing criticality in practice is currently lacking. In this paper, we outline and explore ...
Flow of Competence in UX Design Practice
CHI '15: Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsUX and design culture are beginning to dominate corporate priorities, but despite the current hype there is often a disconnect between the organizational efficiencies desired by executives and the knowledge of how UX can or should address these issues. ...
Evolution of design competence in UX practice
CHI '14: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsThere has been increasing interest in the adoption of UX within corporate environments, and what competencies translate into effective UX design. This paper addresses the space between pedagogy and UX practice through the lens of competence, with the ...
Comments