skip to main content
research-article

Perceptions of incompetence in the ICT workplace

Published: 05 January 2016 Publication History

Abstract

The aim of this study is to examine incompetence in the Australian ICT workplace from the perspective of Australian ICT professionals. The data collection for this project included conducting a quantitative survey, conducting qualitative interviews and conducting focus group discussions with key informants. Of the 2,315 respondents who participated in the survey, the MRF analysis revealed that incompetence was ranked fifth from the top of a list of the 57 most common ethical problems experienced by ICT professionals (N=750, 35.9%). An inspection of the results of the cross tabulations revealed that 34.8% described their occupational category as manager and 29.1% indicated they were consultants. The GLM has found a significant relationship between the choice of incompetence and occupation (Deviance = 23.15, Df = 6, P=0.0007) suggesting occupation, among other things, does predict the choice of incompetence. The findings from the qualitative interviews are consistent with the above findings. A cross referencing of the interviewees responses that addressed the issue of incompetence during the interviews against their occupation has revealed that consultants had more to say on the topic than any other occupation (20.8% or 10 of the 48 references). This is followed by managers who accounted for 14.6% (7 of the 48 references). These findings indicate that the experienced professionals have a greater concern about incompetence than others; an observation that the findings from the focus group interviews have also confirmed. Obtaining such findings would not have been possible had only one method been used.

References

[1]
Genus, A. 1997. Unstructuring incompetence: Problems of contracting, trust and the development of the channel tunnel. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management. 9, 4, 419--436. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/226899027?accountid=10344
[2]
Beckstead, J. W. 2005. Reporting peer wrongdoing in the healthcare profession: the role of incompetence and substance abuse information. International Journal of Nursing Studies. 42, 3 (March 2005), 325--331. DOI=http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2004.07.003
[3]
Avizienis, A.; Laprie, J.-C.; Randell, B.; Landwehr, C. 2004. Basic concepts and taxonomy of dependable and secure computing. Dependable and Secure Computing, IEEE Transactions. 1, 1 (Jan.-March 2004), 11--33. DOI= 10.1109/TDSC.2004.2. Retrieved from http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=1335465&isnumber=29463
[4]
Glass, R. L. 2013. The Queensland Health Payroll Debacle. Information Systems Management. 30, 1, 89--90, DOI= 10.1080/10580530.2013.739899
[5]
Baba, M. 1999 Dangerous Liaisons: Trust, Distrust, and Information Technology in American Work Organizations. Human Organization. 58, 3 (September 1999), 331--346. DOI= http://dx.doi.org/10.17730/humo.58.3.ht622pk6l41l35m1
[6]
Euchner, J. A. 2011. Innovation's "Skilled Incompetence". Research Technology Management, 54, 5, 10--11. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/894748350?accountid=100344
[7]
Merriam Webster Dictionary. 2013, Trust (verb). Merriam-Webster Dictionary. Retrieved on June 1, 2013 from http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/trust.
[8]
Good, D. 2000. Individuals, Interpersonal Relations, and Trust, in Gambetta, Diego (Ed.) Trust: Making and Breaking Cooperative Relations, electronic edition, Department of Sociology, University of Oxford, chapter 3, pp. 31--48.
[9]
Rempel, J. K., Holmes, J. G., and Zanna, M. P. 1985. Trust in Close Relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 49, 95--112.
[10]
Weckert, J. 2005. Trust in Cyberspace, in R. Cavalier, (Ed), The Impact of the Internet on Our Moral Lives, State University of New York Press, New York, pp. 95--117.
[11]
Al-Saggaf, Y. & Burmeister, O. K. 2013. A survey of Australian ICT professionals' perceptions regarding the most common ethical problems they face in the workplace. In M. Warren (Eds.). Proceedings of the Seventh AICE Conference (pp. 43--48). RMIT, Melbourne, Australia. December 3, 2013. Retrieved from http://auscomputerethics.files.wordpress.com/2014/02/aice-proceedings-2013.pdf.

Cited By

View all
  • (2017)Professional ethics in the information ageJournal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society10.1108/JICES-11-2016-004515:4(348-356)Online publication date: 8-Dec-2017

Index Terms

  1. Perceptions of incompetence in the ICT workplace

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM SIGCAS Computers and Society
    ACM SIGCAS Computers and Society  Volume 45, Issue 3
    Special Issue on Ethicomp
    September 2015
    446 pages
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 05 January 2016
    Published in SIGCAS Volume 45, Issue 3

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. deviance
    2. generalised linear models
    3. professional ethics
    4. social accountability

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Funding Sources

    • Australian Research Council

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)10
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
    Reflects downloads up to 05 Mar 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2017)Professional ethics in the information ageJournal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society10.1108/JICES-11-2016-004515:4(348-356)Online publication date: 8-Dec-2017

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Figures

    Tables

    Media

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media