skip to main content
10.1145/2875194.2875207acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesahConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Predicting Grasps with a Wearable Inertial and EMG Sensing Unit for Low-Power Detection of In-Hand Objects

Published:25 February 2016Publication History

ABSTRACT

Detecting the task at hand can often be improved when it is also known what object the user is holding. Several sensing modalities have been suggested to identify handheld objects, from wrist-worn RFID readers to cameras. A critical obstacle to using such sensors, however, is that they tend to be too power hungry for continuous usage. This paper proposes a system that detects grasping using first inertial sensors and then Electromyography (EMG) on the forearm, to then selectively activate the object identification sensors. This three-tiered approach would therefore only attempt to identify in-hand objects once it is known a grasping has occurred. Our experiments show that high recall can be obtained for grasp detection, 95% on average across participants, with the grasping of lighter and smaller objects clearly being more difficult.

References

  1. F. Ahmad and P. Musilek. A keystroke and pointer control input interface for wearable computers. In Fourth Annual IEEE Intl. Conf. on Pervasive Computing and Communications, pages 2--11, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. O. Amft, H. Junker, P. Lukowicz, G. Troester, and C. Schuster. Sensing muscle activities with body-worn sensors. In BSN 2006: Proceedings of the International Workshop on Wearable and Implantable Body Sensor Networks. IEEE press, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. E. Berlin, J. Liu, K. Van Laerhoven, and B. Schiele. Coming to grips with the objects we grasp: Detecting interactions with efficient wrist-worn sensors. In International Conference on Tangible and Embedded Interaction (TEI 2010), pages 57--64, Cambridge MA, USA, 01/2010 2010. ACM Press, ACM Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. A. Feldman, E. M. Tapia, S. Sadi, P. Maes, and C. Schmandt. Reachmedia: On-the-move interaction with everyday objects. In Proceedings of the Ninth IEEE International Symposium on Wearable Computers, ISWC '05, pages 52--59, Washington, DC, USA, 2005. IEEE Computer Society. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. K. P. Fishkin, M. Philipose, and A. D. Rea. Hands-on RFID: wireless wearables for detecting use of objects. In Ninth IEEE International Symposium on Wearable Computers (ISWC 2005), 18-21 October 2005, Osaka, Japan, pages 38--43. IEEE Computer Society, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. N. Gillian and J. A. Paradiso. The gesture recognition toolkit. The Journal of Machine Learning Research, 15(1):3483--3487, 2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. T. Grosse-Puppendahl. Capacitive Sensing and Communication for Ubiquitous Interaction and Env. Perception. PhD thesis, TU Darmstadt, May 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. T. Grosse-Puppendahl, E. Berlin, and M. Borazio. Enhancing accelerometer-based activity recognition with capacitive proximity sensing. In Ambient Intelligence, volume 7683 of LNCS, pages 17--32. Springer, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. A. Hein and T. Kirste. A hybrid approach for recognizing adls and care activities using inertial sensors and rfid. In C. Stephanidis, editor, Intelligent and Ubiquitous Interaction Environments, 5th International Conference, UAHCI 2009, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 178--188, San Diego, CA, USA, 2009. Springer. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. A. Latwesen and P. E. Patterson. Identification of lower arm motions using the emg signals of shoulder muscles. Medical Engineering and Physics, 16(2), 1994.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. T. Maekawa, Y. Kishino, Y. Yanagisawa, and Y. Sakurai. Wristsense: Wrist-worn sensor device with camera for daily activity recognition. In Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops, 2012 IEEE Intl. Conf. on, pages 510--512, March 2012.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. T. Maekawa, Y. Yanagisawa, Y. Kishino, K. Ishiguro, K. Kamei, Y. Sakurai, and T. Okadome. Object-based activity recognition with heterogeneous sensors on wrist. In Pervasive Computing, volume 6030 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 246--264. Springer Berlin, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. D. J. Patterson, D. Fox, H. A. Kautz, and M. Philipose. Fine-grained activity recognition by aggregating abstract object usage. In Ninth IEEE International Symposium on Wearable Computers (ISWC 2005), 18-21 October 2005, Osaka, Japan, pages 44--51. IEEE Computer Society, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. M. Philipose, K. P. Fishkin, M. Perkowitz, D. J. Patterson, D. Fox, H. Kautz, and D. Hahnel. Inferring activities from interactions with objects. Pervasive Computing, 3(4):50âĂŞ57, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. J. Rekimoto. Gesturewrist and gesturepad: Unobtrusive wearable interaction devices. In Proceedings of the 5th IEEE International Symposium on Wearable Computers, ISWC '01, pages 21--, Washington, DC, USA, 2001. IEEE Computer Society. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. A. Schmidt, H. Gellersen, and C. Merz. Enabling implicit human computer interaction: A wearable rfid-tag reader. In Fourth International Symposium on Wearable Computers (ISWC 2000), Atlanta, Georgia, USA, 18--21 October 2000, Proceedings., pages 193--194, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. F. Tavakolizadeh, J. Gu, and B. Saket. Traceband: Locating missing items by visual remembrance. In Proceedings of the Adjunct Publication of the 27th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, UIST'14 Adjunct, pages 109--110, New York, NY, USA, 2014. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. R. Want. An introduction to rfid technology. IEEE Pervasive Computing, 5(1):25--33, Jan. 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. K. Wolf and J. Willaredt. Pickring: seamless interaction through pick-up detection. In Proceedings of the 6th Augmented Human International Conference, AH 2015, Singapore, March 9--11, 2015, pages 13--20, 2015. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. A. Zinnen, K. Van Laerhoven, and B. Schiele. Toward recognition of short and non-repetitive activities from wearable sensors. In Proceedings of the 2007 European conference on Ambient intelligence, pages 142--158. Springer-Verlag, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    AH '16: Proceedings of the 7th Augmented Human International Conference 2016
    February 2016
    258 pages
    ISBN:9781450336802
    DOI:10.1145/2875194

    Copyright © 2016 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 25 February 2016

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Acceptance Rates

    AH '16 Paper Acceptance Rate21of138submissions,15%Overall Acceptance Rate121of306submissions,40%

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader