skip to main content
10.1145/2876034.2893418acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesl-at-sConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Work in Progress

Predicting Students' Performance: Incremental Interaction Classifiers

Published:25 April 2016Publication History

ABSTRACT

One of the Educational Data Mining (EDM) main aims is to predict the final student's performance, analyzing their behavior in the Learning Management Systems (LMSs). Many studies make use of different classifiers to reach this goal, using the total interaction of the students. In this work we study if it is possible to build more accurate classification models in order to predict the output, analyzing the interaction in an incremental way. We study the data gathered for two years with three kinds of classifying algorithms and we compare the total interaction models with the incremental interaction models.

References

  1. Baker, R. S., & Yacef, K. (2009). The state of educational data mining in 2009: A review and future visions. JEDM-Journal of Educational Data Mining, 1(1), 3--17.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Romero, C., & Ventura, S. (2010). Educational data mining: a review of the state of the art. Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C: Applications and Reviews, IEEE Transactions on, 40(6), 601--618. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Romero, C., López, M. I., Luna, J. M., & Ventura, S. (2013). Predicting students' final performance from participation in on-line discussion forums.Computers & Education, 68, 458--472.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Ahmed, A. B. E. D., & Elaraby, I. S. (2014). Data Mining: A prediction for Student's Performance Using Classification Method. World Journal of Computer Application and Technology, 2(2), 43--47.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Bunkar, K., Singh, U. K., Pandya, B., & Bunkar, R. (2012). Data mining: Prediction for performance improvement of graduate students using classification. In WOCN Conference (pp. 1--5). IEEE.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Ranjan, J., Khalil, S. (2008). Conceptual Framework of Data Mining Process in Management Education in India: An Institutional Perspective. In Information Technology Journal, 7, 1, 16--23.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Clow, D. (2013). MOOCs and the funnel of participation. In LAK Conference (pp. 185--189). ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Cohen WW (1995). Fast effective rule induction. In: Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Machine Learning. pp. 115--123.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. S. F. Chen, Z. Q. Chen, Artificial intelligence in knowledge engineering {M}. Nanjing: Nanjing University Press, 1997.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. R.R. Bouckaert. Bayesian Belief Networks: from Construction to Inference. Ph.D. thesis, University of Utrecht, 1995.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Predicting Students' Performance: Incremental Interaction Classifiers

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        L@S '16: Proceedings of the Third (2016) ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale
        April 2016
        446 pages
        ISBN:9781450337267
        DOI:10.1145/2876034

        Copyright © 2016 Owner/Author

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 25 April 2016

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • Work in Progress

        Acceptance Rates

        L@S '16 Paper Acceptance Rate18of79submissions,23%Overall Acceptance Rate117of440submissions,27%

        Upcoming Conference

        L@S '24
        Eleventh ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale
        July 18 - 20, 2024
        Atlanta , GA , USA

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader