skip to main content
10.1145/2876034.2893437acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesl-at-sConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Work in Progress

Promoting Student Engagement in MOOCs

Published: 25 April 2016 Publication History

Abstract

MOOCs offer valuable learning experiences to students from all around the world. In addition to providing filmed lectures, readings, and problem sets, many MOOCs allow students to ask and answer questions about course materials with each other through interactive user forums. However, in current MOOCs, only 3 to 5 percent of those students interact in the user forum (Breslow 2013, Rosé et al. 2014) and more than 90 percent of students stop attending the course altogether (Jordan 2014). According to prior studies, this low level of social engagement in MOOCs may lead to student attrition and low performance (Ren et al. 2007). Hence, a natural question that arises then is, how can we promote interaction among students in MOOC discussion forums in order to reduce students' attrition and raise their performance? In this paper, we conduct a field experiment on the edX platform to identify factors that promote student engagement in MOOC discussion forums. Researchers have discovered that the number of people interacting in one online location (e.g. group, community or virtual classroom size) is a key characteristic mediating user engagement (Butler et. al 2014), and most prior works have shown that users in a smaller size group participate more per person. However, contrary to prior research, our results show that the students in larger size cohorts interact more per person and that this greater interaction in turn increases student retention and performance.

References

[1]
Blatchford, P., & Mortimore, P. (1994). The issue of class size for young children in schools: what can we learn from research?. Oxford Review of Education, 20(4), 411--428.
[2]
Boudreau, K. J., & Lakhani, K. R. (2013). Using the crowd as an innovation partner. Harvard business review, 91(4), 60--69.
[3]
Breslow, L., Pritchard, D. E., DeBoer, J., Stump, G. S., Ho, A. D., & Seaton, D. T. (2013). Studying learning in the worldwide classroom: Research into edX's first MOOC. Research & Practice in Assessment, 8(1), 13--25.
[4]
Butler, B. S. (2001). Membership size, communication activity, and sustainability: A resource-based model of online social structures. Information systems research, 12(4), 346--362.
[5]
Butler, B. S., Bateman, P. J., Gray, P. H., & Diamant, E. I. (2014). An attraction-selection-attrition theory of online community size and resilience. Mis Quarterly, 38(3), 699--728.
[6]
Darley, J. M., & Latane, B. (1968). Bystander intervention in emergencies: diffusion of responsibility. Journal of personality and social psychology, 8(4p1), 377.
[7]
Finn, J. D., Pannozzo, G. M., & Achilles, C. M. (2003). The "why's" of class size: Student behavior in small classes. Review of Educational Research, 73(3), 321--368
[8]
Jordan, K. (2014). Initial trends in enrolment and completion of massive open online courses. The International Review Of Research In Open And Distributed Learning, 15(1).
[9]
Kozinets, R. V., Hemetsberger, A., & Schau, H. J. (2008). The wisdom of consumer crowds collective innovation in the age of networked marketing.Journal of Macromarketing, 28(4), 339--354.
[10]
Latane, B., Williams, K., & Harkins, S. (1979). Many hands make light the work: The causes and consequences of social loafing. Journal of personality and social psychology, 37(6), 822.
[11]
Levine, J. M., and R. L. Moreland 1998 "Small groups" in The handbook of social psychology. D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske and G. Lindzey (eds). 415--469. Boston: McGraw-Hill.
[12]
Ren, Y., Kraut, R., & Kiesler, S. (2007). Applying common identity and bond theory to design of online communities. Organization studies, 28(3), 377--408.
[13]
Rosé, C. P., Carlson, R., Yang, D., Wen, M., Resnick, L., Goldman, P., & Sherer, J. (2014, March). Social factors that contribute to attrition in moocs. In Proceedings of the first ACM conference on Learning@ scale conference (pp. 197--198). ACM.
[14]
Wasko, M. M., & Faraj, S. (2005). Why should I share? Examining social capital and knowledge contribution in electronic networks of practice. MIS quarterly, 35--57.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Forums, Feedback, and Two Kinds of AI: A Selective History of Learning @ ScaleProceedings of the Eleventh ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale10.1145/3657604.3664667(376-382)Online publication date: 9-Jul-2024
  • (2024)Cyber Safety Awareness Through a Massive Open Online Course (MOOC): Community Engagement Knowledge TransferIntelligent Computing10.1007/978-3-031-62277-9_23(365-376)Online publication date: 13-Jun-2024
  • (2023)Working Adults' Experiences and Continuous Intention Towards MOOCsInternational Journal of Cyber Behavior, Psychology and Learning10.4018/IJCBPL.32409213:1(1-18)Online publication date: 8-Jun-2023
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Promoting Student Engagement in MOOCs

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    L@S '16: Proceedings of the Third (2016) ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale
    April 2016
    446 pages
    ISBN:9781450337267
    DOI:10.1145/2876034
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 25 April 2016

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. cohort size
    2. discussion forum
    3. moocs
    4. performance
    5. student engagement
    6. student retention

    Qualifiers

    • Work in progress

    Conference

    L@S 2016
    Sponsor:
    L@S 2016: Third (2016) ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale
    April 25 - 26, 2016
    Scotland, Edinburgh, UK

    Acceptance Rates

    L@S '16 Paper Acceptance Rate 18 of 79 submissions, 23%;
    Overall Acceptance Rate 117 of 440 submissions, 27%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)22
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2
    Reflects downloads up to 08 Mar 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)Forums, Feedback, and Two Kinds of AI: A Selective History of Learning @ ScaleProceedings of the Eleventh ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale10.1145/3657604.3664667(376-382)Online publication date: 9-Jul-2024
    • (2024)Cyber Safety Awareness Through a Massive Open Online Course (MOOC): Community Engagement Knowledge TransferIntelligent Computing10.1007/978-3-031-62277-9_23(365-376)Online publication date: 13-Jun-2024
    • (2023)Working Adults' Experiences and Continuous Intention Towards MOOCsInternational Journal of Cyber Behavior, Psychology and Learning10.4018/IJCBPL.32409213:1(1-18)Online publication date: 8-Jun-2023
    • (2022)Kitlesel Açık Çevrimiçi Ders Ortamlarında Öğrenci KatılımıÖğretim Teknolojisi ve Hayat Boyu Öğrenme Dergisi - Instructional Technology and Lifelong Learning10.52911/itall.1194260Online publication date: 11-Dec-2022
    • (2021)Combating Procrastination on Massive Online Open Courses via Optimal Calls to ActionInformation Systems Research10.1287/isre.2020.097432:2(301-317)Online publication date: 1-Jun-2021
    • (2021)Teacher-Guardian Collaboration for Emergency Remote Learning in the COVID-19 CrisisProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/34795435:CSCW2(1-26)Online publication date: 18-Oct-2021
    • (2021)A mobile educational platform based on peer influence and instructional scaffolding for engaging students in out-of-class activities2021 International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT)10.1109/ICALT52272.2021.00026(61-65)Online publication date: Jul-2021
    • (2020)Examining learning engagement in MOOCs: a self-determination theoretical perspective using mixed methodInternational Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education10.1186/s41239-020-0179-517:1Online publication date: 25-Feb-2020
    • (2019)VUCProceedings of the ACM Conference on Global Computing Education10.1145/3300115.3309514(99-105)Online publication date: 9-May-2019
    • (2018)A content engagement score for online learning platformsProceedings of the Fifth Annual ACM Conference on Learning at Scale10.1145/3231644.3231683(1-4)Online publication date: 26-Jun-2018
    • Show More Cited By

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Figures

    Tables

    Media

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media