skip to main content
10.1145/2888451.2888460acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesikddConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Learning from Gurus: Analysis and Modeling of Reopened Questions on Stack Overflow

Authors Info & Claims
Published:13 March 2016Publication History

ABSTRACT

Community-driven Question Answering (Q&A) platforms are gaining popularity now-a-days and the number of posts on such platforms are increasing tremendously. Thus, the challenge to keep these platforms noise-free is attracting the interest of research community. Stack Overflow is one such popular computer programming related Q&A platform. The established users on Stack Overflow have learnt the acceptable format and scope of questions in due course. Even if their questions get closed, they are aware of the required edits, therefore the chances of their questions being reopened increases. On the other hand, non-established users have not adapted to the Stack Overflow system and find difficulty in editing their closed questions. In this work, we aim to identify features which help differentiate editing approaches of established and non-established users, and motivate the need of recommendation model. Such a recommendation model can assist every user to edit their closed questions leveraging the edit-style of the established users of the platform.

References

  1. Established users. http://stackoverflow.com/help/privileges/established-user.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Stack overflow data dump. https://archive.org/details/stackexchange.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Stack overflow: How to ask? http://stackoverflow.com/help/how-to-ask.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Correa, D., and Sureka, A. Fit or unfit: analysis and prediction of closed questions' on stack overflow. In COSN (2013), pp. 201--212. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Correa, D., and Sureka, A. Chaff from the wheat: characterization and modeling of deleted questions on stack overflow. In WWW (2014), pp. 631--642. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Ponzanelli, L., Mocci, A., Bacchelli, A., Lanza, M., and Fullerton, D. Improving low quality stack overflow post detection. In ICSME (2014), pp. 541--544. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Riahi, F., Zolaktaf, Z., Shafiei, M., and Milios, E. Finding expert users in community question answering. In WWW (2012), pp. 791--798. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Shah, C., and Pomerantz, J. Evaluating and predicting answer quality in community qa. In SIGIR (2010), pp. 411--418. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    CODS '16: Proceedings of the 3rd IKDD Conference on Data Science, 2016
    March 2016
    122 pages
    ISBN:9781450342179
    DOI:10.1145/2888451
    • General Chairs:
    • Madhav Marathe,
    • Mukesh Mohania,
    • Program Chairs:
    • Mausam,
    • Prateek Jain

    Copyright © 2016 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 13 March 2016

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader