research-article

How do free/open source developers pick their tools?: a Delphi study of the Debian project

Authors:

Martin F. Krafft,

Klaas-Jan Stol,

Brian FitzgeraldAuthors Info & Claims

ICSE '16: Proceedings of the 38th International Conference on Software Engineering Companion

Pages 232 - 241

https://doi.org/10.1145/2889160.2889248

Published: 14 May 2016 Publication History

Abstract

Free and Open Source Software (FOSS) has come to play a critical role in the global software industry. Organizations are widely adopting FOSS and interacting with open source communities, and hence organizations have a considerable interest in seeing these communities flourishing. Little research has focused on the tools used to develop that software. Given the absence of formal mandate that would appear in traditional organizations, an open question is what influences a FOSS contributor's decision to adopt a tool and how workflows get established in FOSS teams. In this paper we report on a Delphi study conducted in the Debian Project, one of the largest FOSS projects. Drawing from data collected in three phases from a panel of 21 carefully selected and well-informed participants, we identified 15 factors that affect decisions to adopt tools and relate those to existing models of innovation and diffusion.

References

[1]

Amor-Iglesias, J.-J., Gonzalez-Barahona, J. M., Robles, G. and Herraiz, I. 2005. Measuring libre software using Debian 3.1 (Sarge) as a case study. UPGRADE, 6, 3.

[2]

Bagozzi, R. P. 2007. The Legacy of the Technology Acceptance Model and a proposal for a paradigm shift. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 8, 4.

[3]

Barth, A., Carlo, A. D., Hertzog, R., Nussbaum, L., Schwarz, C. and Jackson, I. 2014. Debian Developer's Ref. v3.4.14.

[4]

Bruckhaus, T., Madhavji, N. H., Janssen, I. and Henshaw, J. 1996. The Impact of Tools on Software Productivity. IEEE Software, 13, 5.

Digital Library

[5]

Crowston, K., Wei, K., Howison, J. and Wiggins, A. 2012. Free/Libre Open Source Software Development: What We Know and What We Do Not Know. ACM Comput. Surv., 44.

Digital Library

[6]

Dalkey, N. and Helmer, O. 1963. An experimental application of the Delphi method to the use of experts. Management Science, 9, 3.

Digital Library

[7]

Dalkey, N. C. 1972. The Delphi method: an experimental study of group opinion. Lexington Books.

[8]

Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P. and Warshaw, P. R. 1989. User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35, 8.

Digital Library

[9]

Debian Community. 2004. Debian Social Contract v. 1.1.

[10]

Dishaw, M. T. and Strong, D. M. 1998. Supporting software maintenance with software engineering tools: A Computed task-technology fit analysis. J. Sys. Soft., 44, 2.

Digital Library

[11]

Dunn, W. N. 1994. Public Policy Analysis: An Introduction. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

[12]

Eckhardt, A., Laumer, S. and Weitzel, T. 2009. Who influences whom? Analyzing workplace referents' social influence on IT adoption and non-adoption. J Inf Tech 24, 1

[13]

Fitzgerald, B. 2006. The Transformation of Open Source Software. MIS Quart., 30, 3.

Digital Library

[14]

Fitzgerald, B., Kesan, J. P., Russo, B., Shaikh, M. and Succi, G. 2011. Adopting Open Source Software. MIT Press.

Digital Library

[15]

Fraser, S., Cooper, K., Coplien, J., Lennon, R., Ravichandar, R., Spinellis, D. and Succi, G. 2012. Software Tools Research: A Matter of Scale and Scope - or Commoditization? In Proc. 3rd Conf. SPLASH. ACM.

Digital Library

[16]

Goodhue, D. L. and Thompson, R. L. 1995. Task-technology fit and individual performance. MIS Quart., 19, 2.

Digital Library

[17]

Guba, E. G. 1981. Criteria for assessing the trustworthiness of naturalistic inquiries. Edu. Commun. Technol., 29, 2.

[18]

Harrison, W., Ossher, H. and Tarr, P. 2000. Software Engineering Tools and Environments: A Roadmap. In Proc. Future of Software Engineering.

Digital Library

[19]

Hauge, Ø., Ayala, C. and Conradi, R. 2010. Adoption of open source software in software-intensive organizations-A systematic literature review. Inf. Softw. Technol., 52, 11.

Digital Library

[20]

Iivari, J. 1996. Why are CASE Tools not used? CACM, 39.

Digital Library

[21]

Judd, R. C. 1972. Use of Delphi methods in higher education. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 4, 2.

[22]

Keeney, S., Hasson, F. and McKenna, H. 2011. The Delphi Technique in Nursing and Health Research. Wiley.

[23]

Krafft, M. F. 2006. The Debian System: Concepts and Techniques. No Starch Press.

Digital Library

[24]

Krafft, M. F. 2010. A Delphi study of the influences on innovation adoption and process evolution in a large open-source project: The case of Debian. University of Limerick.

[25]

Kwon, T. H. and Zmud, R. W. 1987. Unifying the fragmented models of information systems implementation. John Wiley.

[26]

Laurie, B. 2008. Debian and OpenSSL: The Aftermath. http://www.links.org/?p=328.

[27]

Lee, Y., Kozar, K. A. and Larsen, K. R. 2003. The Technology Acceptance Model: Past, Present, and Future. Comm. Assoc. Inform. Syst., 12.

[28]

Linstone, H. A. and Turoff, M. 2002. The Delphi Method: Techniques and Applications. Information Systems Department, New Jersey Institute of Technology.

[29]

Loo, R. 2002. The Delphi method: a powerful tool for strategic management. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management, 25, 4.

[30]

Mosley, V. 1992. How to Assess Tools Efficiently and Quantitatively. IEEE Softw., 9, 3.

Digital Library

[31]

Novak, J. D. and Cañas, A. J. 2006. The theory underlying concept maps and how to construct and use them. Florida Institute for Human and Machine Cognition.

[32]

O'Sullivan, B. 2009. Making Sense of Revision-Control Systems. Commun. ACM, 52, 9.

Digital Library

[33]

Okoli, C. and Pawlowski, S. D. 2004. The Delphi method as a research tool: an example, design considerations and applications. Information & Management, 42, 1.

Digital Library

[34]

Paraskevas, A. and Saunders, M. N. K. 2012. Beyond consensus: an alternative use of Delphi enquiry in hospitality research. Int'l J. Contemporary Hospitality Manage, 24, 6.

[35]

Patton, M. Q. 2001. Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods. Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA, USA.

[36]

Pfleeger, S. L. and Menezes, W. 2000. Marketing Technology to Software Practitioners. IEEE Softw., 17, 1.

Digital Library

[37]

Prechelt, L. and Oezbek, C. 2011. The search for a research method for studying OSS process innovation. Empir Software Eng, 16, 4.

Digital Library

[38]

Raghavan, S. A. and Chand, D. R. 1989. Diffusing softwareengineering methods. IEEE Software, 6, 4.

Digital Library

[39]

Raymond, E. S. 2001. The Cathedral & the Bazaar. O'Reilly.

[40]

Redwine, S. T. and Riddle, W. E. 1985. Software technology maturation. In Proc. ICSE.

Digital Library

[41]

Rogers, E. M. 2003. Diffusion of Innovations. Free Press.

[42]

Rossi, B., Russo, B. and Succi, G. 2012. Adoption of free/libre open source software in public organizations: factors of impact. Information Technology & People, 25, 2.

[43]

Rugg, G. and McGeorge, P. 2005. The sorting techniques: a tutorial paper on card sorts, picture sorts and item sorts. Expert Systems, 22, 3.

[44]

Schmidt, R. C. 1997. Managing Delphi Surveys Using Nonparametric Statistical Techniques. Decision Sciences, 28.

[45]

Shaikh, M. and Cornford, T. 2003. Version Management Tools: CVS to BK in the Linux Kernel. In Proc. 3rd Workshop Open Source Softw. Eng.

[46]

Spinellis, D. 2012. Git. IEEE Softw., 29, 3.

Digital Library

[47]

Turoff, M. 1970. The Design of a Policy Delphi. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 2, 2.

[48]

Wicks, M. N. and Dewar, R. G. 2007. A new research agenda for tool integration. J. Syst. Softw., 80, 9.

Digital Library

Cited By

Winter EBowes DCounsell SHall THaraldsson SNowack VWoodward J(2023) How do Developers Really Feel About Bug Fixing? Directions for Automatic Program Repair IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering10.1109/TSE.2022.319418849:4(1823-1841)Online publication date: 1-Apr-2023
https://doi.org/10.1109/TSE.2022.3194188
Barcomb AStol KFitzgerald BRiehle D(2022)Managing Episodic Volunteers in Free/Libre/Open Source Software CommunitiesIEEE Transactions on Software Engineering10.1109/TSE.2020.298509348:1(260-277)Online publication date: 1-Jan-2022
https://doi.org/10.1109/TSE.2020.2985093
Stol KFitzgerald B(2018)The ABC of Software Engineering ResearchACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology10.1145/324174327:3(1-51)Online publication date: 17-Sep-2018
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3241743
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

How do free/open source developers pick their tools?: a Delphi study of the Debian project
1. Software and its engineering
  1. Software creation and management
    1. Collaboration in software development
  2. Software notations and tools
    1. Software maintenance tools

Recommendations

History of free and open source software: Free and open source software, Free software licence, Open source license, Free Software Foundation, Open Source Initiative, GNU Project
Do software developers understand open source licenses?
ICPC '17: Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Program Comprehension

Software provided under open source licenses is widely used, from forming high-profile stand-alone applications (e.g., Mozilla Firefox) to being embedded in commercial offerings (e.g., network routers). Despite the high frequency of use of open source ...
Open innovation using open source tools: a case study at Sony Mobile

Despite growing interest of Open Innovation (OI) in Software Engineering (SE), little is known about what triggers software organizations to adopt it and how this affects SE practices. OI can be realized in numerous of ways, including Open Source ...

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences

ICSE '16: Proceedings of the 38th International Conference on Software Engineering Companion

May 2016

946 pages

ISBN:9781450342056

DOI:10.1145/2889160

General Chair:
Laura Dillon
Michigan State University
,
Program Chairs:
Willem Visser
Stellenbosch University, South Africa
,
Laurie Williams
North Carolina State University

Copyright © 2016 ACM.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Sponsors

ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGSOFT: ACM Special Interest Group on Software Engineering
IEEE-CS\TCSE: TC on Software Engineering
IEEE-CS\DATC: IEEE Computer Society

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 14 May 2016

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article

Funding Sources

Conference

ICSE '16

Sponsor:

ACM
SIGSOFT
IEEE-CS\TCSE
IEEE-CS\DATC

ICSE '16: 38th International Conference on Software Engineering

May 14 - 22, 2016

Texas, Austin

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 276 of 1,856 submissions, 15%

Upcoming Conference

ICSE 2025

2025 IEEE/ACM 46th International Conference on Software Engineering

April 26 - May 3, 2025

Ottawa , ON , Canada

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

6
Total Citations
View Citations
263
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)23
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2

Reflects downloads up to 01 Mar 2025

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Winter EBowes DCounsell SHall THaraldsson SNowack VWoodward J(2023) How do Developers Really Feel About Bug Fixing? Directions for Automatic Program Repair IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering10.1109/TSE.2022.319418849:4(1823-1841)Online publication date: 1-Apr-2023
https://doi.org/10.1109/TSE.2022.3194188
Barcomb AStol KFitzgerald BRiehle D(2022)Managing Episodic Volunteers in Free/Libre/Open Source Software CommunitiesIEEE Transactions on Software Engineering10.1109/TSE.2020.298509348:1(260-277)Online publication date: 1-Jan-2022
https://doi.org/10.1109/TSE.2020.2985093
Stol KFitzgerald B(2018)The ABC of Software Engineering ResearchACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology10.1145/324174327:3(1-51)Online publication date: 17-Sep-2018
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3241743
Russo DCiancarini PFalasconi TTomasi M(2018)A Meta-Model for Information Systems QualityACM Transactions on Management Information Systems10.1145/32307139:3(1-38)Online publication date: 26-Sep-2018
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3230713
Miranda APimentel JHaddad HWainwright RChbeir R(2018)On the use of package managers by the C++ open-source communityProceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Symposium on Applied Computing10.1145/3167132.3167290(1483-1491)Online publication date: 9-Apr-2018
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3167132.3167290
Russo DCiancarini PFalasconi TTomasi MJuristo NShepherd D(2017)Software quality concerns in the Italian bank sectorProceedings of the 39th International Conference on Software Engineering: Software Engineering in Practice Track10.1109/ICSE-SEIP.2017.10(63-72)Online publication date: 20-May-2017
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1109/ICSE-SEIP.2017.10

View Options

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

Figures

Tables

Media

View Table of Conten