skip to main content
10.1145/2889160.2889264acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicseConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Ontology learning and its application in software-intensive projects

Published:14 May 2016Publication History

ABSTRACT

Software artifacts, such as requirements, design, source code, documentation, and safety-related artifacts are typically expressed using domain-specific terminology. Automated tools which attempt to analyze software artifacts in order to perform tasks such as trace retrieval and maintenance, domain analysis, program comprehension, or to service natural language queries, need to understand the vocabulary and concepts of the domain in order to achieve acceptable levels of accuracy. Domain concepts can be captured and stored as an ontology. Unfortunately, constructing ontologies is extremely time-consuming and has proven hard to automate. This dissertation proposes a novel approach for semi-automated ontology building that leverages user-defined trace links to identify candidate domain facts. It uses a variety of web-mining, Natural Language Processing, and machine learning techniques to filter and rank the candidate facts, and to assist the user in building a domain-specific ontology. The benefits of the constructed ontology are described and evaluated within the context of automated trace link creation.

References

  1. A. Carlson, J. Betteridge, B. Kisiel, B. Settles, E. R. Hruschka, and T. M. Mitchell. Toward an architecture for never-ending language learning. In In AAAI, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. R. Gacitua and P. Sawyer. Ensemble methods for ontology learning - an empirical experiment to evaluate combinations of concept acquisition techniques. In 7th IEEE/ACIS Conf. on Computer and Information Science, ICIS 2008, USA, pages 328--333, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. R. Gacitua, P. Sawyer, and P. Rayson. A flexible framework to experiment with ontology learning techniques. Knowl.-Based Syst., 21(3):192--199, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. T. R. Gruber. A translation approach to portable ontology specifications. Knowledge acquisition, 5(2):199--220, 1993. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. J. Guo, J. Cleland-Huang, and B. Berenbach. Foundations for an expert system in domain-specific traceability. In Requirements Engineering Conference (RE), 2013 21st IEEE International, pages 42--51. IEEE, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. J. Guo, N. Monaikul, C. Plepel, and J. Cleland-Huang. Towards an intelligent domain-specific traceability solution. In Proceedings of the 29th ACM/IEEE international conference on Automated software engineering, pages 755--766. ACM, 2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. J. H. Hayes, A. Dekhtyar, and S. K. Sundaram. Advancing candidate link generation for requirements tracing: The study of methods. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng., 32(1):4--19, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. M. A. Hearst. Automatic acquisition of hyponyms from large text corpora. In Proceedings of the 14th conference on Computational linguistics-Volume 2, pages 539--545. Association for Computational Linguistics, 1992. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. I. Jureta, J. Mylopoulos, and S. Faulkner. A core ontology for requirements. Applied Ontology, 4(3-4):169--244, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. G. A. Miller. Wordnet: a lexical database for english. Communications of the ACM, 38(11):39--41, 1995. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. D. Movshovitz-Attias and W. W. Cohen. Grounded discovery of coordinate term relationships between software entities, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. K. Robles, A. Fraga, J. Morato, and J. Lloréns. Towards an ontology-based retrieval of UML class diagrams. Information & Software Technology, 54(1):72--86, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. M. Ruiz-Casado, E. Alfonseca, and P. Castells. Automatising the learning of lexical patterns: An application to the enrichment of wordnet by extracting semantic relationships from wikipedia. Data Knowl. Eng., 61(3):484--499, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. F. M. Suchanek, G. Kasneci, and G. Weikum. Yago: a core of semantic knowledge. In Proc. 16th international conference on World Wide Web, pages 697--706. ACM, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. B. Verlaine, Y. Dubois, I. Jureta, and S. Faulkner. Towards conceptual foundations for service-oriented requirements engineering: bridging requirements and services ontologies. IET Software, 6(2):85--102, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. C. Wang, A. Kalyanpur, J. Fan, B. K. Boguraev, and D. Gondek. Relation extraction and scoring in deepqa. IBM Journal of Research and Development, 56(3.4):9--1, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. W. Wu et al. Probase: A probabilistic taxonomy for text understanding. In 2012 ACM SIGMOD Int'l Conf on Management of Data, SIGMOD '12, pages 481--492, New York, NY, USA, 2012. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Ontology learning and its application in software-intensive projects

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        ICSE '16: Proceedings of the 38th International Conference on Software Engineering Companion
        May 2016
        946 pages
        ISBN:9781450342056
        DOI:10.1145/2889160

        Copyright © 2016 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 14 May 2016

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate276of1,856submissions,15%

        Upcoming Conference

        ICSE 2025

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader