skip to main content
10.1145/2889160.2889267acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicseConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Mining software process lines

Published:14 May 2016Publication History

ABSTRACT

There is a vast growth of generated event data being collected and stored by organizations. Within the field of Process Mining, this data has been used to discover, analyze and enhance processes from different domains. For this purpose there are hundreds of techniques available in different tools. These techniques are mostly focused on single processes. On the other hand, there are several proposals for dealing with multiple processes. Under different names, such as: configurable process models, process families or process lines, processes are characterized by capturing commonalities and variability between (similar) process models. These approaches have shown to be useful for organizations that have multiple variants of a given process, e.g., reducing redundancy and maintenance time. In this research proposal, we are developing a framework that allows the use of Process Mining techniques in families of processes within the software development domain (i.e., Software Process Lines).

References

  1. O. Armbrust, M. Katahira, Y. Miyamoto, J. Münch, H. Nakao, and A. Ocampo. Scoping software process lines. Software Process: Improvement and Practice, 14(3):181--197, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. O. Armbrust and D. Rombach. The right process for each context: objective evidence needed. In Proceedings of the 2011 International Conference on Software and Systems Process, pages 237--241. ACM, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. M. C. Bastarrica, J. Simmonds, and L. Silvestre. Using megamodeling to improve industrial adoption of complex MDE solutions. In Proceedings of the 6th International Workshop on Modeling in Software Engineering, pages 31--36. ACM, 2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. F. R. Blum, M. C. Bastarrica, and J. Simmonds. Software Process Line Discovery from (Noisy) Logs. In Proceedings of REVASOFT'2014, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. F. R. Blum, J. Simmonds, and M. C. Bastarrica. Software process line discovery. In Proceedings of the 2015 International Conference on Software and System Process, pages 127--136. ACM, 2015. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. J. C. Buijs, B. F. van Dongen, and W. M. van der Aalst. Mining configurable process models from collections of event logs. In Business Process Management, pages 33--48. Springer, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. D. D. de Carvalho, L. F. Chagas, A. M. Lima, and C. A. L. Reis. Software process lines: A systematic literature review. In Software Process Improvement and Capability Determination, pages 118--130. Springer, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. T. Martıınez-Ruiz, F. Garcııa, M. Piattini, and J. Munch. Modelling software process variability: an empirical study. Software, IET, 5(2):172--187, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. J. Münch, O. Armbrust, M. Kowalczyk, and M. Soto. Software Process Definition and Management. The Fraunhofer IESE Series on Software and Systems Engineering. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. R. M. Pillat, T. C. Oliveira, P. S. Alencar, and D. D. Cowan. BPMNt: A BPMN extension for specifying software process tailoring. Information and Software Technology, 57:95--115, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. P. Runeson, M. Host, A. Rainer, and B. Regnell. Case study research in software engineering: Guidelines and examples. John Wiley & Sons, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. R. Santos, T. C. Oliveira, et al. Mining software development process variations. In Proceedings of the 30th Annual ACM Symposium on Applied Computing, pages 1657--1660. ACM, 2015. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. J. Schramm, P. Dohrmann, and M. Kuhrmann. Development of flexible software process lines with variability operations: a longitudinal case study. In Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering, page 13. ACM, 2015. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. M. Weidlich, J. Mendling, and M. Weske. A foundational approach for managing process variability. In Advanced Information Systems Engineering, pages 267--282. Springer, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. R. K. Yin. Case study research: Design and methods. Sage publications, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  1. Mining software process lines

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          ICSE '16: Proceedings of the 38th International Conference on Software Engineering Companion
          May 2016
          946 pages
          ISBN:9781450342056
          DOI:10.1145/2889160

          Copyright © 2016 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 14 May 2016

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate276of1,856submissions,15%

          Upcoming Conference

          ICSE 2025

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader