skip to main content
10.1145/2890602.2890611acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescprConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

A Literature Review on Enterprise Social Media Collaboration in Virtual Teams: Challenges, Determinants, Implications and Impacts

Published:02 June 2016Publication History

ABSTRACT

This literature review focusses research on Enterprise Social Media (ESM) and its use within virtual teams. The paper includes results from 38 articles outlining the existing body of knowledge and showing the steady progress in this research field. Previous literature often thematizes the external use of social media and technological aspects, but this research concentrates on the internal collaborative use, its challenges, related determinants, managerial implications and its impact on business. Existing research illustrates key factors in each of the previously mentioned subjects. However, as research should consider the entire field, a research agenda for further studies in this ESM topic is developed.

References

  1. Aral, S. et al. 2013. Social Media and Business Transformation: A Framework for Research. Information Systems Research. 24, 1 (Mar. 2013), 3--13.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Baumard, P. 2002. Tacit knowledge in professional firms: the teachings of firms in very puzzling situations. Journal of Knowledge Management. 6, 2 (2002), 135--151.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Beinhauer, M. 2010. Revolution 2.0 - Organizational Impact of Social Media on Society and Enterprises. International Scientific Conference XI. 7 (Mar. 2010), 10--14.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Brake, T. 2006. Leading Global Virtual Teams. Industrial and Commercial Training. 38, 3 (2006), 116--121.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Vom Brocke, J. et al. 2009. Reconstructing the Giant: On the Importance of Rigour in Documenting the Literature Search Process. 17th European Conference on Information Systems. (2009), 2206--2217.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Chui, M. et al. 2012. The Social Economy: Unlocking Value And Productivity Through Social Technologies. McKinsey Global Institute. July (2012), 1--18.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Conklin, J. and Jeff Conklin 2005. Dialogue mapping: building shared undestading of wicked problems. Dialogue Mapping: Building Shared Understanding of Wicked Problems. John Wiley & Sons. 1--25. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Cottone, P. et al. 2007. "Solving" ambiguity in the virtual space: communication strategies in a collaborative virtual environment. Cognition, Technology & Work. 11, 2 (2007), 151--163. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Cottone, P. et al. 2009. "Solving" ambiguity in the virtual space: communication strategies in a collaborative virtual environment. Cognition, Technology & Work. 11, 2 (2009), 151--163. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Cross, R. et al. 2010. How Organizational Network Analysis Facilitated Transition From Regional To A Global IT Function. MIS Quarterly Executive. 9, 3 (Sep. 2010), 133--145.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. David, G.C. et al. 2008. Integrated collaboration across distributed sites: the perils of process and the promise of practice. Journal of Information Technology. 23, 1 (2008), 44--54.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Eckhardt, A. et al. 2015. The effect of personality on IT personnel's job-related attitudes: Establishing a dispositional model of turnover intention across IT job types. Journal of Information Technology. 31, 1 (2015), 48--66.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Eom, M. 2009. Cross-cultural virtual team and its key antecedents to success. The Journal of Applied Business and Economics. 10, 1 (2009), 1--14.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Fedorowicz, J. et al. 2008. Creativity, Innovation and E-Collaboration. International Journal of e-Collaboration. 4, 4 (2008), 1--11.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Fruchter, R. et al. 2010. Tension between perceived collocation and actual geographic distribution in project teams. Ai & Society. 25, 2 (2010), 183--192. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Garmestani, A.S. and Benson, M.H. 2013. A Framework for Resilience-based Governance of Social-Ecological. Ecology and Society. 18, 1 (2013).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Gibson, C.B. et al. 2014. Where Global and Virtual Meet: The Value of Examining the Intersection of These Elements in Twenty-First-Century Teams. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior. 1, 1 (2014), 217--244.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Gibson, C.B. and Gibbs, J.L. 2006. Unpacking the Concept of Virtuality : on Team Innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly. 51, (2006), 451--495.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Harper, F.M. et al. 2007. Social Comparisons to Motivate Contributions to an Online Community. Persuasive Technology. 4744, (2007), 148--159. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Herbsleb, J.D. et al. 2002. Introducing Instant Messaging and Chat in the Workplace. Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI'02). (2002), 171--178. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Ibarra, H. and Hansen, M.T. 2011. Are you a collaborative leader? Harvard business review. 89, 7--8 (2011).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Kane, G.C. 2015. Enterprise Social Media: Current Capabilities and Future Possibilities. MIS Quarterly Executive. 14, 1 (Mar. 2015), 1--16.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Kim, G. et al. 2011. IT Capabilities, Process-Oriented Dynamic Capabilities, and Firm Financial Performance. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 12, 7 (Jul. 2011), 487--517.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Kim, S. and Lee, H. 2006. The Impact of Organizational Context and Information Technology on Employee Knowledge-Sharing Capabilities. Public Administration Review. 66, 3 (May 2006), 370--385.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Kirkman, B.L. et al. 2004. The Impact of Team Empowerment on Virtual Team Performance: The Moderating Role of Face-To-Face Interaction. Academy of Management Journal. 47, 2 (2004), 175--192.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Kiron, D. et al. 2013. Social Business: Shifting Out of First Gear. MIT Sloan Management Review. (2013).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Kotlarsky, J. and Oshri, I. 2005. Social ties, knowledge sharing and successful collaboration in globally distributed system development projects. European Journal of Information Systems. December 2004 (2005), 37--48. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. von Krogh, G. 2012. How does social software change knowledge management? Toward a strategic research agenda. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems. 21, 2 (2012), 154--164. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Laumer, S. et al. 2015. User personality and resistance to mandatory information systems in organizations: a theoretical model and empirical test of dispositional resistance to change. Journal of Information Technology. (2015), 1--16.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Laumer, S. et al. 2016. Work routines as an object of resistance during information systems implementations: Theoretical foundation and empirical evidence. European Journal of Information Systems. Forthcomin, (2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Leonardi, P.M. et al. 2013. Enterprise Social Media: Definition, History, and Prospects for the Study of Social Technologies in Organizations. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication. 19, 1 (2013), 1--19.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Leonardi, P.M. 2014. Social Media, Knowledge Sharing, and Innovation: Toward a Theory of Communication Visibility. Information Systems Research. 25, 4 (Dec. 2014), 796--816. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Leonardi, P.M. 2013. When does technology use enable network change in organizations? A comparative study of feature use and shared affordances. MIS Quarterly. 37, 3 (Sep. 2013), 749--775. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Lombard, M. and Ditton, T. 1997. At the Heart of It All: The Concept of Presence. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication. 3, 2 (1997), 0.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. Lowry, P.B. et al. 2013. Evaluating Journal Quality and the Association for Information Systems Senior Scholars' Journal Basket Via Bibliometric Measures: Do Expert Journal Assessments Add Value? MIS Quarterly. 37, 4 (2013), 993--1012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Maier, C. et al. 2015. The Effects of Technostress and Switching-Stress on Discontinued Use of Social Networking Services: A Study of Facebook Use. Information Systems Journal. 25, 3 (2015), 275--308. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Maier, C. et al. 2015. Who really quits? A longitudinal analysis of voluntary turnover among IT personnel. ACM SIGMIS Database. 46, 4 (2015), 26--47. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Nuyens, G. 2009. Advanced Collaboration Techniques for More Effective Management. Public Manager. 38, 3 (2009), 14--18.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Osch, W. Van et al. 2015. Enterprise Social Media: Challenges and Opportunities for Organizational Communication and Collaboration. 48th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences Enterprise (2015), 763--772. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Osch, W. Van 2012. The Duality of Social Media : Structuration and Socialization through Organizational Communication The Duality of Social Media : Structuration and Socialization through Organizational Communication. Special Interest Group on Human-Computer Interaction (2012), 1--6.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Pyöriä, P. 2009. Virtual collaboration in knowledge work: from vision to reality. Team Performance Management: An International Journal. 15, 7/8 (2009), 366--381.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  42. Rashid, A.M. et al. 2006. Motivating participation by displaying the value of contribution. ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. (2006), 955--958. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. Ray, D. 2014. Overcoming cross-cultural barriers to knowledge management using social media. Journal of Enterprise Information Management. 27, 1 (Feb. 2014), 45--55.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  44. Richter, D. et al. 2011. Internet Social Networking. Business & Information Systems Engineering. 3, 2 (2011), 89--101.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  45. Robert Lionel P., J. et al. 2008. Social Capital and Knowledge Integration in Digitally Enabled Teams. Information Systems Research. 19, 3 (Sep. 2008), 314--334.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. Roy, S. 2012. Virtual Collaboration: The Skills Needed to Collaborate in a Virtual Environment. Journal of Internet Social Networking & Virtual Communities. 2012, (2012), 1--8.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  47. Sarker, S. and Sahay, S. 2004. Implications of space and time for distributed work: an interpretive study of US-Norwegian systems development teams. European Journal of Information Systems. 13, 1 (2004), 3--20. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  48. Shachaf, P. 2005. Bridging cultural diversity through e-mail. Journal of Global Information Technology Management. 8, (2005), 46--60.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  49. Skeels, M.M. and Grudin, J. 2009. When Social Networks Cross Boundaries?: A Case Study of Workplace Use of Facebook and LinkedIn. Group. 10, 3 (2009), 95--103. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  50. Smith, P.G. and Blanck, E.L. 2002. From experience: Leading dispersed teams. Journal of Product Innovation Management. 19, 4 (2002), 294--304.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  51. Subramaniam, N. et al. 2013. Exploring social network interactions in enterprise systems: the role of virtual co-presence. Information Systems Journal. 23, 6 (Nov. 2013), 475--499.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  52. Suduc, A.-M. et al. 2009. Exploring Multimedia Web Conferencing. Informatica Economica. 13, 3 (2009), 5--17.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  53. Torraco, R.J. 2005. Writing Integrative Literature Reviews: Guidelines and Examples. Human Resource Development Review. 4, 3 (2005), 356--367.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  54. Treem, J.W. and Leonardi, P.M. 2012. Communication Yearbook, 36 (2012). (2012).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  55. Volpe, C.E. et al. 1996. The impact of cross-training on team functioning: an empirical investigation. Human factors. 38, 1 (1996), 87--100.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  56. Webster, J. and Watsons, R.T. 2002. Analyzing the Past to Prepare for the Future: Writing a Literature Review. MIS Quarterly. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  57. Wenger, E.C. and Snyder, W.M. 2000. Communities of practice: The organizational frontier. Harvard Business Review. 78, (2000), 139--145.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  58. Yamauchi, Y. and Swanson, E.B. 2010. Local assimilation of an enterprise system: Situated learning by means of familiarity pockets. Information and Organization. 20, 3--4 (Jul. 2010), 187--206. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. A Literature Review on Enterprise Social Media Collaboration in Virtual Teams: Challenges, Determinants, Implications and Impacts

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        SIGMIS-CPR '16: Proceedings of the 2016 ACM SIGMIS Conference on Computers and People Research
        June 2016
        168 pages
        ISBN:9781450342032
        DOI:10.1145/2890602

        Copyright © 2016 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 2 June 2016

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate300of480submissions,63%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader