skip to main content
10.1145/2890602.2890619acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescprConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Big Data and Analytics Leaders: the Changing Role of CIO

Published:02 June 2016Publication History

ABSTRACT

This article investigates the changing role of the Chief Information Officer (CIO) at organizational level with regard to the rise of Big Data and Big Data analytics as a potential source of innovation and competitive advantage. The paper aims to provide a theoretical contribution to the research stream on the topic, by further exploring the emergent properties and understandings related to the role of CIO. As a consequence of the need to adopt advanced technologies, the CIO has been named to master the current unheard information growth for business innovation. To this end we present the results of a qualitative research based on grounded theory carried out on data concerning CIOs of medium and large companies from different industries in the Italian market. Finally, a substantive theory and categories are discussed, showing the role of generation gap and power of new entrants as well as of project and execution excellence on the making of identity and recognition of the CIO as relevant at the time of Big Data analytics.

References

  1. Press, G. 2013. A Very Short History Of Big Data. http://www.forbes.com/sites/gilpress/2013/05/09/a-very-short-history-of-big-data/#178ca51455da. Accessed: 2016-04-05.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Akella, J., Marwaha, S., and Sikes, J. 2014. How Cios Can Lead Their Company's Information Business. McKinsey on Business Technology. 33, Spring (2014).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Applegate, L.M. and Elam, J.J. 1992. New Information Systems Leaders: a Changing Role in a Changing World. MIS Quarterly. 16, 4 (1992), 469--490. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Baesens, B., Bapna, R., Mardsen, J., Vanthienen, J. and Zhao, J. 2014. Transformational Issues of Big Data and Analytics in Networked Business. MIS Quarterly. 38, 2 (2014), 629--630. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Biesdorf, S., Court, D. and Willmott, P. 2013. Big Data: What's Your Plan? McKinsey Quarterly. (2013).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Brereton, P., Kitchenham, B.A., Budgen, D., Turner, M. and Khalil, M. 2007. Lessons from applying the systematic literature review process within the software engineering domain. Journal of Systems and Software. 80, 4 (2007), 571--583. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Bryant, A. 2009. Grounded Theory and Pragmatism: The Curious Case of Anselm Strauss. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research. 10, 3 (2009).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Buhl, H.U. 2013. Interview with Martin Petry on "Big Data." Business & Information Systems Engineering. 2, (2013), 101--102.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Charmaz, K. 2006. Constructing grounded theory: a practical guide through qualitative analysis. Sage Publications.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Chen, H., Chiang, R.H.L. and Storey, V.C. 2012. Business Intelligence and Analytics: From Big Data to Big Impact. MIS Quarterly. 36, 4 (2012), 1165--1188. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Cooper, H.M. 1988. Organizing knowledge syntheses: A taxonomy of literature reviews. Knowledge in Society. 1, 1 (1988), 104--126.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Davenport, T.H. and Patil, D.J. 2012. Data Scientist : The Sexiest Job Of the 21st Century. Harvard Business Review. October (2012).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. European Commission and data industry launch 2.5 billion partnership to master Big Data: 2014. http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-14--1129_en.htm.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Francalanci, C. and Morabito, V. 2008. IS integration and business performance: The mediation effect of organizational absorptive capacity in SMEs. Journal of Information technology. 23, (2008), 297--312.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Gillon, K., Aral, S., Lin, C.Y., Mithas, S. and Zozulia, M. 2014. Business analytics: Radical shift or incremental change? Communications of the Association for Information Systems. 34, (2014), 287--296.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Glaser, B.G. 2005. The Grounded Theory Perspective III: Theoretical coding. The Sociology Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Glaser, B.G. 1978. Theoretical Sensitivity: Advances in the Methodology of Grounded Theory. The Sociology Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Glaser, B.G. and Strauss, A.L. 1967. The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Aldine.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Guillemette, M. and Paré, G. 2012. Toward a New Theory of the Contribution of the It Function in Organizations. MIS Quarterly. 36, 2 (2012), 529--551. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Karpovsky, A. and Galliers, R. 2012. Sources of Power and Cio Influence and Their Impact: An Explorative Survey. International Conference of Information Systems (2012).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Lavalle, S., Lesser, E., Shockley, R., Hopkins, M.S. and Kruschwitz, N. 2011. Big Data, Analytics and the Path From Insights to Value. MIT Sloan Management Review. 52, 2 (2011).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Liamputtong, P. 2011. Focus Group Methodology - Principles and Practice. SAGE.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Lim, J., Han, K. and Mithas, S. 2013. How Cio Position Influences Information Technology Investments and Firm Performance. International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS2013) (2013).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Manfreda, A. and Indihar Štemberger, M. 2013. The impact of top management support on the perceived IS value -- should we focus on the partnership? UK Academy for Information Systems Conference (2013).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Marton, A., Avital, M. and Blegind Jensen, T. 2013. Reframing Open Big Data. ECIS 2013 (2013).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Merali, Y., Papadopoulos, T. and Nadkarni, T. 2012. Information systems strategy: Past, present, future? Journal of Strategic Information Systems. 21, 2 (2012), 125--153. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Miles, M.. and Huberman, A.. 1994. Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. SAGE Publications.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Ragowsky, A., Licker, P., Miller, J., Gefen, D. and Stern, M. 2014. Do Not Call Me Chief Information Officer, but Chief Integration Officer. A Summary of the 2011 Detroit CIO Roundtable. Communications of the Association for Information Systems. 34, (2014).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Tamm, T., Seddon, P. and Shanks, G. 2013. Pathways to Value from Business Analytics. International Conference of Information Systems (ICIS2013) (2013).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. The Economist 2014. A Cambrian Moment - Special Report Tech Startups (January 18th 2014).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. The Economist 2010. Data, data everywhere. Special Report: Managing information.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Anderson, C. 2008. The End of Theory: The Data Deluge Makes the Scientific Method Obsolete. http://www.wired.com/2008/06/pb-theory/. Accessed: 2016-04-05.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Urquhart, C. 2013. Grounded Theory for Qualitative Research - A Practical Guide. SAGE Publications.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Walsham, G. 1993. Interpreting information systems in organizations. Wiley. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Big Data and Analytics Leaders: the Changing Role of CIO

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        SIGMIS-CPR '16: Proceedings of the 2016 ACM SIGMIS Conference on Computers and People Research
        June 2016
        168 pages
        ISBN:9781450342032
        DOI:10.1145/2890602

        Copyright © 2016 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 2 June 2016

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate300of480submissions,63%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader