skip to main content
10.1145/2899415.2899452acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesiticseConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

On the Number of Attempts Students Made on Some Online Programming Exercises During Semester and their Subsequent Performance on Final Exam Questions

Published:11 July 2016Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper explores the relationship between student performance on online programming exercises completed during semester with subsequent student performance on a final exam. We introduce an approach that combines whether or not a student produced a correct solution to an online exercise with information on the number of attempts at the exercise submitted by the student. We use data collected from students in an introductory Java course to assess the value of this approach. We compare the approach that utilizes the number of attempts to an approach that simply considers whether or not a student produced a correct solution to each exercise. We found that the results for the method that utilizes the number of attempts correlates better with performance on a final exam.

References

  1. A. Ahadi, R. Lister, H. Haapala, and A. Vihavainen. Exploring machine learning methods to automatically identify students in need of assistance. In Proceedings of the Eleventh Annual International Conference on International Computing Education Research, ICER '15, pages 121{130, New York, NY, USA, 2015. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. M. C. Jadud. Methods and tools for exploring novice compilation behaviour. In Proceedings of the second international workshop on Computing education research, pages 73--84. ACM, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. A. Papoulis. Probability and Statistics. Prentence-Hall International Editions, 1990. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. M. M. T. Rodrigo, E. Tabanao, M. B. E. Lahoz, and M. C. Jadud. Analyzing online protocols to characterize novice Java programmers. Philippine Journal of Science, 138(2):177--190, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. C. Watson, F. W. Li, and J. L. Godwin. Predicting performance in an introductory programming course by logging and analyzing student programming behavior. In Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT), 2013 IEEE 13th International Conference on, pages 319--323. IEEE, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. F. Yates. Contingency tables involving small numbers and the Ï G2 test. Supplement to the Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 1(2):217--235, 1934Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. On the Number of Attempts Students Made on Some Online Programming Exercises During Semester and their Subsequent Performance on Final Exam Questions

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Conferences
    ITiCSE '16: Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education
    July 2016
    394 pages
    ISBN:9781450342315
    DOI:10.1145/2899415

    Copyright © 2016 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 11 July 2016

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article

    Acceptance Rates

    ITiCSE '16 Paper Acceptance Rate56of147submissions,38%Overall Acceptance Rate552of1,613submissions,34%

    Upcoming Conference

    ITiCSE 2024

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader