skip to main content
10.1145/2901378.2901381acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagespadsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Coupling Simulation with Machine Learning: A Hybrid Approach for Elderly Discharge Planning

Authors Info & Claims
Published:15 May 2016Publication History

ABSTRACT

Healthcare systems are increasingly challenged by the phenomenal growth of population ageing. Healthcare executives are, and will be, in an inevitable need of evidence-based artifacts for decision making. The paper addresses issues in the context of discharge planning for elderly patients with application to hip fracture care in Ireland. A hybrid approach is embraced that integrates simulation modeling with machine learning in an attempt to improve the validity of the simulation model outputs. In terms of simulation modeling, a discrete event simulation model is used to model the elderly patient's journey through the care scheme of hip fracture. In tandem with the simulation model, predictive models are used to guide the simulation model. Specifically, the predictive models are used to make predictions on the inpatient length of stay and discharge destination of simulation-generated patients. On a population basis, the simulation model provides demand predictions for healthcare resources related to discharge destinations, with a focus on long-stay care such as nursing homes. Our results suggest that there may be a need to reconsider the geographic distribution of nursing homes within particular areas in Ireland in order to keep abreast of the foreseen shift in demographics. Furthermore, the incorporation of machine learning within simulation modeling is claimed to improve the predictive power of the simulation model.

References

  1. Cohen, K.J. and Cyert, R.M., 1965. Simulation of organizational behavior. Handbook of Organizations, Rand McNally.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Ashby, W.R., 1970. Analysis of the system to be modeled. The process of model building in the behavioral sciences, pp.94--114.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Stanislaw, H., 1986. Tests of computer simulation validity: what do they measure?. Simulation & Games. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Gershenson, C., 2001. Complex philosophy. arXiv preprint nlin/0109001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Abu-Taieh, E.M. ed., 2009. Handbook of Research on Discrete Event Simulation Environments: Technologies and Applications: Technologies and Applications. IGI Global. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. https://www.noca.ie/irish-hip-fracture-database, accessed on 26/12/2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Barga, R., Fontama, V. and Tok, W.H., 2015. Predictive Analytics with Microsoft Azure Machine Learning. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. O'Keefe, G.E., Jurkovich, G.J. and Maier, R.V., 1999. Defining excess resource utilization and identifying associated factors for trauma victims. Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, 46(3), pp.473--478.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Englert, J., Davis, K.M. and Koch, K.E., 2001. Using clinical practice analysis to improve care. Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety, 27(6), pp.291--301.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Guru, V., Anderson, G.M., Fremes, S.E., O'Connor, G.T., Grover, F.L., Tu, J.V. and Consensus, C.C.S.Q.I., 2005. The identification and development of Canadian coronary artery bypass graft surgery quality indicators. The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery, 130(5), pp.1257-e1.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Brasel, K.J., Lim, H.J., Nirula, R. and Weigelt, J.A., 2007. Length of stay: an appropriate quality measure?. Archives of Surgery, 142(5), pp.461--466.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Japkowicz, N. and Stephen, S., 2002. The class imbalance problem: A systematic study. Intelligent data analysis, 6(5), pp.429--449. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Yang, Q. and Wu, X., 2006. 10 challenging problems in data mining research. International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making, 5(04), pp.597--604.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Japkowicz, N., 2000, July. Learning from imbalanced data sets: a comparison of various strategies. In AAAI workshop on learning from imbalanced data sets (Vol. 68, pp. 10--15).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Hodge, V.J. and Austin, J., 2004. A survey of outlier detection methodologies. Artificial Intelligence Review, 22(2), pp.85--126. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Sarsfield, S., 2009. The data governance imperative. IT Governance Publishing. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Johansen, A., Wakeman, R., Boulton, C., Plant, F., Roberts, J. and Williams, A., 2013. National Hip Fracture Database: National Report 2013. Clinical Effectiveness and Evaluation Unit at the Royal College of Physicians.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Altmann, A., Toloşi, L., Sander, O. and Lengauer, T., 2010. Permutation importance: a corrected feature importance measure. Bioinformatics, 26(10), pp.1340--1347. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Law, A.M. and Kelton, W.D., 1991. Simulation modeling and analysis, 1991. New York: McGrae-Hill Inc. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. http://www.cso.ie/en/statistics/population/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Shannon, R.E., 1975. Systems simulation: the art and science (Vol. 1). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. British Orthopaedic Association and British Geriatric Society, The Care of Patients with Fragility Fracture ("Blue Book"), BritishOrthopaedic Association and BritishGeriatric Society, London,UK, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. http://www.hse.ie/eng/services/publications/corporate/CHO_Chapter_1.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Dodds, M.K., Codd, M.B., Looney, A. and Mulhall, K.J., 2009. Incidence of hip fracture in the Republic of Ireland and future projections: a population-based study. Osteoporosis international, 20(12), pp.2105--2110.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Rosenberg, M. and Everitt, J., 2001. Planning for aging populations: inside or outside the walls. Progress in Planning, 56(3), pp.119--168.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Lechler, T. and Page, B., 1999, October. DESMO-J: An object oriented discrete simulation framework in Java. In Proceedings of the 11th European Simulation Symposium (pp. 46--50).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Law, A.M., 2009, December. How to build valid and credible simulation models. In Simulation Conference (WSC), Proceedings of the 2009 Winter (pp. 24--33). IEEE. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Martis, M.S., 2006. Validation of simulation based models: a theoretical outlook. The Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 4(1), pp.39--46.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Lloyd-Sherlock, P., 2000. Population ageing in developed and developing regions: implications for health policy. Social science & medicine, 51(6), pp.887--895.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. United Nations. World Population Ageing 2007 (United Nations, New York, 2007).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Christensen, K., Doblhammer, G., Rau, R. and Vaupel, J.W., 2009. Ageing populations: the challenges ahead. The Lancet, 374(9696), pp. 1196--1208.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Lutz, W., Sanderson, W. and Scherbov, S., 2008. The coming acceleration of global population ageing. Nature, 451(7179), pp. 716--719.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. Rechel, B., Grundy, E., Robine, J.M., Cylus, J., Mackenbach, J.P., Knai, C. and McKee, M., 2013. Ageing in the European union. The Lancet, 381(9874), pp. 1312--1322.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. European Commission. 2009 Ageing report: economic and budgetary projections for the EU-27 Member States (2008-2060). Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Health Service Executive. Annual Report and Financial Statements 2014, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. https://www.hiqa.ie/social-care/find-a-centre/nursing-homesGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Cooper, C., Campion, G. and Melton Iii, L.J., 1992. Hip fractures in the elderly: a world-wide projection. Osteoporosis international, 2(6), pp.285--289.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  38. Melton, L.J., 1996. Epidemiology of hip fractures: implications of the exponential increase with age. Bone, 18(3), pp.S121--S125.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  39. Gullberg, B., Johnell, O. and Kanis, J.A., 1997. World-wide projections for hip fracture. Osteoporosis international, 7(5), pp.407--413.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  40. Ellanti, P., Cushen, B., Galbraith, A., Brent, L., Hurson, C. and Ahern, E., 2014. Improving Hip Fracture Care in Ireland: A Preliminary Report of the Irish Hip Fracture Database. Journal of osteoporosis, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Ragab, M., Abo-Hamad, W. and Arisha, A., 2012. Capacity Planning for Elderly Care in Ireland Using Simulation Modeling.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Rashwan, W., Ragab, M., Abo-Hamad, W. and Arisha, A., 2013, December. Evaluating policy interventions for delayed discharge: a system dynamics approach. In Proceedings of the 2013 Winter Simulation Conference: Simulation: Making Decisions in a Complex World (pp. 2463--2474). IEEE Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. http://www.hpo.ie/hipe/hipe_data_dictionary/HIPE_Data_Dictionary_2015_V7.0.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. http://www.hse.ie/eng/services/publications/olderpeople/Executive_Summary_-_Strategy_to_Prevent_Falls_and_Fractures_in_Ireland%E2%80%99s_Ageing_Population.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. Breiman, L., 2001. Random forests. Machine learning, 45(1), pp.5--32. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Coupling Simulation with Machine Learning: A Hybrid Approach for Elderly Discharge Planning

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      SIGSIM-PADS '16: Proceedings of the 2016 ACM SIGSIM Conference on Principles of Advanced Discrete Simulation
      May 2016
      272 pages
      ISBN:9781450337427
      DOI:10.1145/2901378

      Copyright © 2016 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 15 May 2016

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate398of779submissions,51%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader