skip to main content
10.1145/2901790.2901892acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesdisConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Honorable Mention

Study and Design of a Shape-Shifting Wall Display

Published:04 June 2016Publication History

ABSTRACT

Wall displays almost universally assume a mostly flat and static shape. We ask two questions: Would people choose a flat display for a given interaction scenario and, if not, what are the display shapes they actually prefer? We conducted a design study around these two questions. Our results show that participants designed different screen shapes that varied based upon peoples' distance from the display and the content shown. Shapes ranged primarily between flat, separated, concave, L-shape and convex displays. Based on our findings, we designed a dynamic display that changes to these and other configurations. Shape-shifting is controlled either by explicit interaction (where the display responds to hand gestures) or implicitly (where the display infers a shape based both on its content and the sensed positions of the people around it). Overall, we contribute: a study that motivates research on shape-shifting wall displays, and a shape-shifting display system that responds to explicit and implicit controls to match particular activities.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

pn0653-file3.wmv

wmv

48.9 MB

References

  1. Alexander, J., Lucero, A., and Subramanian, S. Tilt displays: designing display surfaces with multi-axis tilting and actuation. MobileHCI'12, 161--170. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Ardito, C. Buono, P., Costabile, M., and Desolda, G. Interaction with Large Displays: A Survey. ACM Comput. Surv. 47, 3, Article 46, 2015, 38 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Box by Bot & Dolly: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lX6JcybgDFoGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Endert, A., Bradel, L., Zeitz, J., Andrews, C., and North, C. Designing large high-resolution display workspaces. AVI'12, 58--65. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Double Robotics http://www.doublerobotics.com/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Gjerlufsen, T., Klokmose, C., Eagan, J., Pillias, C., and Beaudouin-Lafon, M. Shared substance: developing flexible multi-surface applications. CHI'11, 3383--3392. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Gomes, A., and Vertegaal, R. PaperFold: evaluating shape changes for viewport transformations in foldable thin-film display devices. TEI'15, 153--160. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Gutwin, C. and Greenberg, S. A descriptive framework of workspace awareness for real-time groupware. Journal of Computer Supported Cooperative Work 11(3--4), 411--446, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Hall, E. The hidden dimension; Doubleday 1966.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Hinckley, K., Dixon, M., Sarin, R., Guimbretiere, F., and Balakrishnan, R. Codex: a dual screen tablet computer. CHI'09, 1933--1942. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Ichino, J., Isoda, K., Hanai, A., and Ueda, T. Effects of the display angle in museums on user's cognition, behavior, and subjective responses. CHI'13, 2979--2988. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Ju, W., Lee, B.A., Klemmer, S.R. Range: exploring implicit interaction through electronic whiteboard design. CSCW '08, 17--26. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Karnik, A., Plasencia, D., Mayol-Cuevas, W., and Subramanian, S. PiVOT: personalized view-overlays for tabletops. UIST'12, 271--280. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Koppel, M., Bailly, G., Müller, J., and Walter, R. Chained displays: configurations of public displays can be used to influence actor-, audience-, and passer-by behavior. CHI'12, 317--326. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Lissermann, R., Huber, J., Schmitz, M., Steimle, J. and Max Mühlhäuser. Permulin: mixed-focus collaboration on multi-view tabletops. CHI'14, 3191--3200. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Marquardt, N., Hinckley, K., and Greenberg, S. Crossdevice interaction via micro-mobility and f-formations. UIST'12, 13--22. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Marquardt, N. and Greenberg, S. Proxemic interactions: from theory to practice. series: Synthesis Lectures on Human-Centered Informatics, Morgan & Claypool Publishers, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Nacenta, M., Sakurai, S., Yamaguchi, T., Miki, Y., Itoh, Y., Kitamura, Y., Subramanian, S. and Carl Gutwin. Econic: a perspective-aware interface for multi-display environments. UIST'07, 279--288. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. openFrameworks: http://openframeworks.cc/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Pingali, G., Pinhanez, C., Levas, A., Kjeldsen, R., Podlaseck, M., Chen, N., and Sukaviriya, N. Steerable Interfaces for Pervasive Computing Spaces, IEEE conf. Pervasive Computing and Communications, 23--26,2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Pla, P. and Maes, P. Display blocks: a set of cubic displays for tangible, multi-perspective data exploration. TEI'13, 307--314. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Rasmussen, M. Pedersen, E., Petersen, M., and Hornbæk, K. Shape-changing interfaces: a review of the design space and open research questions. CHI'12, 735--744. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Roboscreen: http://roboticarts.comGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Schmidt, R., Penner, E. and Carpendale, S. Reconfigurable Displays. UBICOMP'04 Workshop: Ubiquitous Display Environments.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Takashima, K., Aida, N., Yokoyama, H., and Kitamura, Y. TransfomTable: a self-actuated shape-changing digital table, ITS'13, 179--188. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Takashima, K., Asari, Y., Yokoyama, H., Sharlin, E., and Kitamura, Y. MovemenTable: The design of moving interactive tabletops, INTERACT'15, LNCS 9298, 296--314.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Tandler, P., Prante, P., Müller-Tomfelde, C., Streitz, N., and Steinmetz, R. ConnecTables: dynamic coupling of displays for flexible creation of shared workspaces, UIST'01, 11--20. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Vogel, D., and Balakrishnan, R. Interactive public ambient displays: transitioning from implicit to explicit, public to personal, interaction with multiple users. UIST'04, 137--146. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Wallace, J., Scott, S., Lai, E., Deon, J. Investigating the role of a large, shared display in multi-display environments, Journal of Computer Supported Cooperative Work, Vol 20. Issue 6, 529--561, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Study and Design of a Shape-Shifting Wall Display

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      DIS '16: Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems
      June 2016
      1374 pages
      ISBN:9781450340311
      DOI:10.1145/2901790

      Copyright © 2016 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 4 June 2016

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      DIS '16 Paper Acceptance Rate107of418submissions,26%Overall Acceptance Rate1,158of4,684submissions,25%

      Upcoming Conference

      DIS '24
      Designing Interactive Systems Conference
      July 1 - 5, 2024
      IT University of Copenhagen , Denmark

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader