ABSTRACT
In this paper, nutrient variability inclusion at different probability levels for animal feed formulation is discussed. Mathematical model is formulated by stochastic programming and diets are formulated at five probability levels. Objective functions are set for cost minimization and shelf life maximization of the feed mix. This paper discusses impact of allowed probability of nutrient concentration and variability of nutrient components for 40 models.
- Church D. C., Brown W. G., and Ralston A. T. 1963. Evaluation of Cattle Fattening Rations Formulated with Linear Programming Techniques. Journal of Animal Science, 22, 898--903.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Cravener T. L., Roush W. B., and D'Alfonso T. H. 1994. Laying hen production responses to least cost rations formulated with stochastic programming or linear programming with a margin of safety. Poultry Science, 73, 1290--1295.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Crosson P., Kiely P. O., and F. P. O. 2006. Mara, Wallace M. The development of a mathematical model to investigate Irish beef production systems. Agricultural Systems, 89, 349--370.Google ScholarCross Ref
- D'Alfonso T. H, Roush W. B., and Ventura J. A. 1992. Least cost poultry rations with nutrient variability: A comparison of linear programming with a margin of safety and stochastic programming models. Poulry Science, 71, 2, 255--262.Google ScholarCross Ref
- F.V. Waugh. 1951. The minimum cost dairy feed. Journal of Farm Economics, 33, 299--310.Google ScholarCross Ref
- National Research Council, 1989. Nutrient requirements of Dairy Cattle. 6th Rev. ed. Natl. Acad. Sci., Washington, DC.Google Scholar
- Pratiksha Saxena and Neha Khanna. 2015. Optimization of Dairy Cattle Feed by Nonlinear Programming, IEEE EXPLORER, Proceedings of 2nd International Conference on Computing for Sustainable Global Development (INDIACom), 1579--1584.Google Scholar
- Pratiksha Saxena, and Neha Khanna. 2014. Animal feed formulation: mathematical programming techniques, CAB Reviews: Perspectives in Agriculture, Veterinary Science, Nutrition and Natural Resources, 9, 35, 1--12.Google Scholar
- Pratiksha Saxena, Neha Khanna. 2015. Computation of Cattle Feed Mix by Using Priority Function: Weighted Goal Programming, IEEE EXPLORER, Proceedings of 2nd International Conference on Computing for Sustainable Global Development (INDIACom),1595--1600.Google Scholar
- Pratiksha Saxena, Vinay Pathak, Vinod Kumar. 2013. Algorithm for Animal Diet Formulation, Animal Nutrition and Feed Technology, 13, 139--146.Google Scholar
- Pratiksha Saxena, Vinay Pathak, Vinod Kumar. 2012. Programming Technique for Animal Diet Formulation: A Non-linear Approach, International Journal of Food Science and Nutrition Engineering, 2, 5, 85--88. DOI: 10.5923/j.food.20120205.03Google ScholarCross Ref
- Rahman S. A., and Bender F. E. 1971. Linear programming approximation of least-cost feed mixes with probability restrictions. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 53, 4, 612--618.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Roush W. B., Cravener T. L., and Fushan Zhang. 1996. Computer formulation observations and caveats. Applied Poultry Science, 5, 116--125.Google ScholarCross Ref
- St. Pierre N. R., and Harvey W. R. 1986. Incorporation of uncertainty in composition of feeds into least-cost ration models: Single-chance constrained programming. Journal of Dairy Science,69, 12, 3051--3062.Google ScholarCross Ref
- St. Pierre N. R., and Harvey W. R. 1986. Incorporation of uncertainty in composition of feeds into least-cost ration models: Joint-chance constrained programming. Journal of Dairy Science, 69, 12, 3063--3073.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Tozer P. R. 2000. Least-cost ration formulations for Holstein dairy heifers by using linear and stochastic programming. Journal of Dairy Science, 83, 443--451.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Udo I. U., Ndome C. B. and Asuquo P. E. 2011. Use of Stochastic Programming in Least-cost Feed Formulation for African Catfish(Clarias gariepinus) in Semi-intensive Culture System in Nigeria. Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Science, 6, 447--455.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Vere D.T. 1972. Maintaining sheep during draught with computer formulated rations. Review of marketing and agricultural economics, 40, 3, 111--122.Google Scholar
- Impact of variable probability level and nutrient concentration on animal diet formulation
Recommendations
Decomposition with branch-and-cut approaches for two-stage stochastic mixed-integer programming
Decomposition has proved to be one of the more effective tools for the solution of large-scale problems, especially those arising in stochastic programming. A decomposition method with wide applicability is Benders' decomposition, which has been applied ...
A branch-and-cut decomposition algorithm for solving chance-constrained mathematical programs with finite support
We present a new approach for exactly solving chance-constrained mathematical programs having discrete distributions with finite support and random polyhedral constraints. Such problems have been notoriously difficult to solve due to nonconvexity of the ...
A joint decomposition method for global optimization of multiscenario nonconvex mixed-integer nonlinear programs
AbstractThis paper proposes a joint decomposition method that combines Lagrangian decomposition and generalized Benders decomposition, to efficiently solve multiscenario nonconvex mixed-integer nonlinear programming (MINLP) problems to global optimality, ...
Comments