Kenneth O. Stanley
- Joshua E. Auerbach and Josh C. Bongard. On the Relationship Between Environmental and Mechanical Complexity in Evolved Robots.Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on the Synthesis and Simulation of Living Systems (ALife XIII). East Lansing, MI, July, 2012.Google Scholar
- Joshua E. Auerbach and Josh C. Bongard. Evolving Complete Robots with CPPN-NEAT: The Utility of Recurrent Connections. Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference (GECCO 2011). Dublin, Ireland, July, 201 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Bongard, J. C. and R. Pfeifer (2003) Evolving Complete Agents Using Artificial Ontogeny. In: Hara, F. and R. Pfeifer, (eds.), Morpho-functional Machines: The New Species (Designing Embodied Intelligence) Springer-Verlag, pp. 237--258.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Cheney N, MacCurdy R, Clune J, Lipson H. Unshackling evolution: evolving soft robots with multiple materials and a powerful generative encoding. Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference (GECCO 2013). Amsterdam, July 2013. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Clune J, Pennock RT, and Ofria C. The sensitivity of HyperNEAT to different geometric representations of a problem. Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference (GECCO 2009). New York, NY: ACM, 2009 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Clune J, Stanley KO, Pennock RT, Ofria C (2011) On the performance of indirect encoding across the continuum of regularity. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation. 15(3): 346--367. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Oliver J. Coleman, Evolving Neural Networks for Visual Processing, Undergraduate Honours Thesis (Bachelor of Computer Science, University of New South Wales School of Computer Science and Engineering), 2010Google Scholar
- D'Ambrosio, D. B. and Stanley, K. O. A Novel Generative Encoding for Exploiting Neural Network Sensor and Output Geometry. In: Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference (GECCO 2007). New York, NY: ACM, 2007 Google ScholarDigital Library
- D'Ambrosio, D. B. and Stanley, K. O. Generative Encoding for Multiagent Learning. In: Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference (GECCO 2008). New York, NY: ACM, 2007 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Dawkins, R.: The Blind Watchmaker. Longman, Essex, U.K. (1986)Google Scholar
- Gauci, J. and Stanley, K. O. Generating Large-Scale Neural Networks Through Discovering Geometric Regularities. In: Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference (GECCO 2007). New York, NY: ACM, 2007 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Gauci, J. and Stanley, K. O. A Case Study on the Critical Role of Geometric Regularity in Machine Learning. In: Proceedings of the Twenty-Third AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-2008). Menlo Park, CA: AAAI Press, 2008. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Gauci, J. and Stanley, K. O. Autonomous Evolution of Topographic Regularities in Artificial Neural Networks. In: Neural Computation journal 22(7), pages 1860--1898. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 2010. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Gruau, F. Neural network synthesis using cellular encoding and the genetic algorithm. PhD thesis, Laboratoire de L'informatique du Paralllisme, Ecole Normale Supriere de Lyon, Lyon, France, 1994.Google Scholar
- Hornby, G.. S. and Pollack, J. B. The Advantages of Generative Grammatical Encodings for Physical Design. In: Congress on Evolutionary Computation. 2001.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Nate Kohl and Risto Miikkulainen (2009). Evolving Neural Networks for Strategic Decision-Making Problems. Neural Networks, Special issue on Goal-Directed Neural Systems. Google ScholarDigital Library
- T. Kowaliw and W. Banzhaf, Augmenting Artificial Development with Local Fitness, In IEEE CEC 2009 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Lindenmayer, A. (1968). Mathematical models for cellular interaction in development: Parts I and II. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 18, 280--299, 300--315.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Lindenmayer, A. (1974). Adding continuous components to L-systems. In G. Rozenberg & A. Salomaa (Eds.), L systems: Lecture notes in computer science 15 (pp. 53--68). Heidelberg, Germany: Springer-Verlag. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Mattiussi, C., and Floreano, D. 2004. Evolution of Analog Networks using Local String Alignment on Highly Reorganizable Genomes. In: Proceedings of the 2004 NASA/DoD Conference on Evolvable Hardware (EH' 2004).Google ScholarCross Ref
- Dawkins, R.: The Blind Watchmaker. Longman, Essex, U.K. (1986)Google Scholar
- Gauci, J. and Stanley, K. O. Generating Large-Scale Neural Networks Through Discovering Geometric Regularities. In: Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference (GECCO 2007). New York, NY: ACM, 2007 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Gauci, J. and Stanley, K. O. A Case Study on the Critical Role of Geometric Regularity in Machine Learning. In: Proceedings of the Twenty-Third AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-2008). Menlo Park, CA: AAAI Press, 2008. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Gauci, J. and Stanley, K. O. Autonomous Evolution of Topographic Regularities in Artificial Neural Networks. In: Neural Computation journal 22(7), pages 1860--1898. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 2010. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Gruau, F. Neural network synthesis using cellular encoding and the genetic algorithm. PhD thesis, Laboratoire de L'informatique du Paralllisme, Ecole Normale Supriere de Lyon, Lyon, France, 1994.Google Scholar
- Hornby, G.. S. and Pollack, J. B. The Advantages of Generative Grammatical Encodings for Physical Design. In: Congress on Evolutionary Computation. 2001.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Nate Kohl and Risto Miikkulainen (2009). Evolving Neural Networks for Strategic Decision-Making Problems. Neural Networks, Special issue on Goal-Directed Neural Systems. Google ScholarDigital Library
- T. Kowaliw and W. Banzhaf, Augmenting Artificial Development with Local Fitness, In IEEE CEC 2009 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Lindenmayer, A. (1968). Mathematical models for cellular interaction in development: Parts I and II. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 18, 280--299, 300--315.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Lindenmayer, A. (1974). Adding continuous components to L-systems. In G. Rozenberg & A. Salomaa (Eds.), L systems: Lecture notes in computer science 15 (pp. 53--68). Heidelberg, Germany: Springer-Verlag. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Mattiussi, C., and Floreano, D. 2004. Evolution of Analog Networks using Local String Alignment on Highly Reorganizable Genomes. In: Proceedings of the 2004 NASA/DoD Conference on Evolvable Hardware (EH' 2004).Google ScholarCross Ref
- Miller J. F. Evolving a self-repairing, self-regulating, French flag organism. In: Proceedings of Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference (GECCO 2004), Springer LNCS 3102 (2004) 129--139.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Nijhout, H. F., & Emlen, D. J. (1998). Competition among body parts in the development and evolution of insect morphology. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 95, 3685--3689.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Raff, R. A. (1996). The shape of life: Genes, development, and the evolution of animal form. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Reisinger, J. and Miikkulainen, R. Acquiring Evolvability through Adaptive Representations. In: Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference (GECCO 2007). New York, NY: ACM, 2007 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Sebastian Risi, Daniel Cellucci, Hod Lipson (2013).Ribosomal Robots: Evolved Designs Inspired by Protein Folding. Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference (GECCO 2013). New York, NY: ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Roggen, D. and Federici, D. Multi-cellular development: is there scalability and robustness to gain? In: Proceedings of PPSN VIII 2004 The 8th International Conference on Parallel Problem Solving from Nature, Xin Yao and al. ed., pp 391--400, (2004).Google ScholarCross Ref
- Jimmy Secretan, Nicholas Beato, David B. D.Ambrosio, Adelein Rodriguez, Adam Campbell, Jeremiah T. Folsom-Kovarik, and Kenneth O. Stanley (2011). Picbreeder: A Case Study in Collaborative Evolutionary Exploration of Design Space. Evolutionary Computation, 19(3): 345--371, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press Google ScholarDigital Library
- Stanley, K. O. and Miikkulainen, R. Evolving neural networks through augmenting topologies. Evolutionary Computation, 10:99--127, 2002. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Stanley, K. O. and Miikkulainen, R. Competitive coevolution through evolutionary complexification. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 21:63--100, 2004. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Stanley, K. O. and Miikkulainen, R. A taxonomy for artificial embryogeny. Artificial Life, 9(2):93--130, 2003. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Stanley, K. O. Compositional Pattern Producing Networks: A Novel Abstraction of Development. In: Genetic Programming and Evolvable Machines Special Issue on Developmental Systems 8(2): 131--162. New York, NY: Springer, 2007 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Stanley, K. O., D'Ambrosio, D.B., and Gauci, J. A Hypercube-Based Indirect Encoding for Evolving Large-Scale Neural Networks. Artificial Life journal 15(2), 2009. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Turing, A. (1952). The chemical basis of morphogenesis. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 237, 37--72.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Waddington, C. H. (1942). Canalization of Development and the Inheritance of Acquired Characters. Nature, 150, 563.Google ScholarCross Ref
Index Terms
- Generative and Developmental Systems Tutorial
Recommendations
Generative and developmental systems tutorial
GECCO Comp '14: Proceedings of the Companion Publication of the 2014 Annual Conference on Genetic and Evolutionary ComputationA hypercube-based encoding for evolving large-scale neural networks
Research in neuroevolution---that is, evolving artificial neural networks (ANNs) through evolutionary algorithms---is inspired by the evolution of biological brains, which can contain trillions of connections. Yet while neuroevolution has produced ...
An enhanced hypercube-based encoding for evolving the placement, density, and connectivity of neurons
Intelligence in nature is the product of living brains, which are themselves the product of natural evolution. Although researchers in the field of neuroevolution NE attempt to recapitulate this process, artificial neural networks ANNs so far evolved ...
Comments