skip to main content
10.1145/2909067.2909081acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageswirConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Image Visualization as per the User Appeal through Deep Learning

Authors Info & Claims
Published:21 March 2016Publication History

ABSTRACT

Visualization is a term used in the wide area of research to visualize the things as per the human vision. Mostly these terms are used to optimize the data, file format, multimedia format to clarify the concept of human understanding and acceptance in easiest manner. To prove the research in this perspective standard term involved to maintain the quality of work is known as scientific. Scientific visualization emphasises that the research on visualization will be performed as deep learning. Image visualization is mostly used in the medical field for visualization of complex images as per human vision. Sometimes images are visualized as enjoyable, memorable, analysis or for understanding the depth behind the images. Deep learning facilitates visualization of images as per the human vision through inceptions of processed vector/pixels involved in a image. The main motive of visualized image through deep learning is to project an image more attractive as per human vision. Different scientific parameters of computations are involved to process the image as per the user interaction. These parameters sometimes create a dangerous form of image, attractive look of image; deform the image quality through counting inceptions. In this article we analyze the deep learning process in an image visualization to find out the actual parameter to achieve the desired quality of image as per human vision and compute the chaining inceptions to form a new image within the images as meta-images.

References

  1. Bruce H. McCornick, Thomas A. DeFanti, Maxine D. Brown, Visualization in Scientific Computing, Vol 21 Number 6 Nov 1987, Published by ACM SIGGRAPH.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Wilma A. Bainbridge, Phillip Isola, and Aude Oliva, The Intrinsic Memorability of Face Photographs, Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 2013, Vol. 142, No. 4, 1323 1334, © 2013 American Psychological Association, 0096-3445/13/$12.00 DOI: 10.1037/a0033872.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Timothy F. Brady, Talia Konkle, George A. Alvarez, and Aude Oliva, Visual long-term memory has a massive storage capacity for object details, PNAS _ September 23, 2008 _ vol. 105 _ no. 38 _ 14325 14329, © 2008 by The National Academy of Sciences of the USA, www.pnas.org_cgi_doi_10.1073_pnas.0803390105.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Stephen Few, Perceptual Edge, Benefitting InfoVis with Visual Difficulties? Provocation Without a Cause, Visual Business Intelligence Newsletter, October/November/December 2011, Copyright © 2011 Stephen Few, Perceptual Edge, Page 1 of 7.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Isola, Parikh, Torralba, and Oliva, Understanding the intrinsic memorability of images. NIPS 2011 preprint.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Michelle A. Borkin, Azalea A. Vo, Zoya Bylinskii, Phillip Isola, Shashank Sunkavalli, Aude Oliva, and Hanspeter Pfister, What Makes a Visualization Memorable?, Manuscript received 31 March 2013; accepted 1 August 2013; posted online 13 October 2013; mailed on 4 October 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Sun Wenbin, Zhao Xuesheng, An Visualization Model Of Global Images Based On QTM, The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences. Vol. XXXVII. Part B2. Beijing 2008, pp-925--930.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Henry Fuchs, Marc Levoy, and Stephen M. Pizer, Interactive Visualization of 3D Medical Data, January, 1989, (revised April, 1989), IEEE.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Bradley M. Hemminger, Timothy J. Cullip, Michael J. North, Interactive Visualization of 3D Medical Image Data.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. ML Viaud, O Buisson, A Saulnier, C.Guenais, Video Exploration: From Multimedia Content Analysis to Interactive Visualization.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Sabrina Bresciani, Martin J. Eppler, The Risks of Visualization: A Classification of Disadvantages Associated with Graphic Representations of Information, University of Lugano (USI), Institute for Corporate Communication, Faculty of Communication Sciences, Lugano, Switzerland, ICA Working Paper # 1/2008, February 2008, pp: 1--22.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Regula Valérie Burri and Joseph Dumit, Social Studies of Scientific Imaging and Visualization, pp: 297--317.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Martin Wattenberg and Fernanda B. Viégas, The Word Tree, an Interactive Visual Concordance, IEEE Transactions On Visualization and Computer Graphics, vol. 14, no. 6, pp: 1221--1228, november/december 2008, Published by the IEEE Computer Society, 1077-2626/08/$25.00 © 2008 IEEE. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. S. Leelalakshmi, K. Rameshkumar, Interactive Visualization - A Review, International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET), Volume: 02 Issue: 03 | Jun-2015, e-ISSN: 2395-0056, pp: 1741--1744, © 2014, IRJET.NET-All Rights Reserved.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Paul Janecek and Pearl Pu, Searching with Semantics: An Interactive Visualization Technique for Exploring an Annotated Image Collection.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Chris Johnson, Visualization Viewpoints: Top Scientific Visualization Research Problems, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, Published by the IEEE Computer Society, 0272-1716/04/$20.00 © 2004 IEEE, pp: 13--17. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Stephen E. Reichenbach, Alex Henderson, Robert Lindquist and Qingping Tao, Efficient encoding and rapid decoding for interactive visualization of large three-dimensional hyperspectral chemical images, Received 28 October 2008; Revised 23 January 2009; Accepted 23 January 2009, Rapid Communications In Mass Spectrometry Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 2009; 23: 1229 1233, Published online in Wiley InterScience (www.interscience.wiley.com) DOI: 10.1002/rcm.3962. DOI: 10.1002/rcm.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Ben Shneiderman, Catherine Plaisant, and Bradford W. Hesse, Improving health and healthcare with interactive visualization methods, HCIL Technical Report. Revised version will appear in IEEE Computer Special Issue on Challenges in Information Visualization (2013), pp: 1--13. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. P. Suwannatat, G. Luna, B. Ruttenberg, R. Raviv, G. Lewis, S.K. Fisher, and T. Hollerer, Interactive Visualization Of Retinal Astrocyte Images, This work is funded in part by NSF grant #0808762.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Lennart Svensson, Image Analysis and Interactive Visualization Techniques for Electron Microscopy Tomograms, Doctoral Thesis Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences Uppsala 2014, Acta Universitatis agriculturae Sueciae 2014:94, ISSN, 1652-6880, ISBN (print version), 978-91-576-8136-2, ISBN (electronic version), 978-91-576-8137-9, © 2014 Lennart Svensson, Uppsala, Print: SLU Service/Repro, Uppsala 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Li Tan, Yangqiu Song, and Shixia Liu, Lexing Xie, ImageHive: Interactive Content-Aware Image Summarization, Published by the IEEE Computer Society, January/February 2012, 0272-1716/12/$31.00 © 2012 IEEE, pp: 46--55. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Hui Fang, Gary Kwok-Leung Tam, Rita Borgo, Andrew J. Aubrey, Philip W. Grant, Paul L. Rosin, Christian Wallraven, Douglas Cunningham, David Marshall and Min Chen, Visualizing Natural Image Statistics, IEEE Transactions On Visualization And Computer Graphics, Vol. 19, No. 7, July 2013, Published By The IEEE Computer Society, 1077-2626/13/$31.00 _ 2013 IEEE, Pp: 1228--1241. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Niki Martinel, Christian Micheloni, Claudio Piciarelli and Gian Luca Foresti, Camera Selection for Adaptive Human Computer Interface, IEEE Transactions On Systems, Man, And Cybernetics: Systems, VOL. 44, NO. 5, MAY 2014, Pp: 653--664, DOI: 10.1109/TSMC.2013.2279661.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Danfeng Liu, Liguo Wang, and Jón Atli Benediktsson, An Interactive Color Visualization Method With Multi-Image Fusion For Hyperspectral Imagery, IGARSS 2015, 978-1-4799-7929-5/15/$31.00 ©2015 IEEE, pp: 1088--1091.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Jialu Fang, Yuntao Qian, Local Detail Enhanced Hyperspectral Image Visualization, IGARSS 2015, 978-1-4799-7929-5/15/$31.00 ©2015 IEEE, pp: 1092--1095.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Daniel F. Keefe, Marcus Ewert, William Ribarsky and Remco Chang, Interactive Coordinated Multiple-View Visualization of Biomechanical Motion Data, IEEE Transactions On Visualization And Computer Graphics, Vol. 15, No. 6, pp: 1383--1390, November/December 2009, Published by the IEEE Computer Society, 1077-2626/09/$25.00 © 2009 IEEE. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Jason Yosinski, Jeff Clune, Anh Nguyen, Thomas Fuchs, Hod Lipson, Understanding Neural Networks Through Deep Visualization, Published in the Deep Learning Workshop, 31st International Conference on Machine Learning, Lille, France, 2015. Copyright 2015 by the author(s).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Yosinski, J., Clune, J., Bengio, Y., and Lipson, H, How transferable are features in deep neural networks? In Ghahramani, Z., Welling, M., Cortes, C., Lawrence, N.D., and Weinberger, K.Q. (eds.), Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 27, pp. 3320 3328. Curran Associates, Inc., December 2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Daniel F. Keefe, Integrating Visualization and Interaction Research to Improve Scientific Workflows, Visualization Viewpoints, Published by the IEEE Computer Society, March/April 2010, pp: 8--13, 0272-1716/10/$26.00 © 2010 IEEE.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    WIR '16: Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Women in Research 2016
    March 2016
    179 pages
    ISBN:9781450342780
    DOI:10.1145/2909067

    Copyright © 2016 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 21 March 2016

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Acceptance Rates

    WIR '16 Paper Acceptance Rate35of117submissions,30%Overall Acceptance Rate35of117submissions,30%
  • Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)4
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1

    Other Metrics

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader