Pia Borlund
Peter Ingwersen
- 1.Belkin, N.J. Cognitive models and information transfer. Social Science Information Studies, (4), 1984, 11 I- ! 29.Google Scholar
- 2.Belkin, N.J., Oddy, R. & Brooks, H. ASK for information retrieval: Part I. Journal of Documentation, (38), 1982, 61-71.Google Scholar
- 3.Borlund, P. and Ingwersen, P. The development of a method for the evaluation of interactive information retrieval systems. Journal of Documentation, (53)3, 1997, 225-250.Google ScholarCross Ref
- 4.Brajnik, G., Mizzaro, S., Tasso, C. Evaluating User Interfaces to Information Retrieval Systems: A case Study on User Support. In: Frei, H.P., Harman, D., Schliuble, P.,Wilkinson, R., eds. Proceedings of the 19th ACM Sigir Conference on Research and Development of lnformation Retrieval. Zurich, 1996. Konstanz: Hartung-Gorre, 1996, 128-136. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 5.Cleverdon, C.W & Keen, E.M. Factors determining the performance of indexing systems. Vol. 1: Design. Vol. 2: Results. Cranfield, UK: Aslib Cranfield Research Project, ! 966.Google Scholar
- 6.Cooper, W.S. A Definition of Relevance for Information Retrieval. Information Storage and Retrieval (7)1, 1971, 19-37.Google ScholarCross Ref
- 7.Cooper, W.S. On Selecting a Measure of Retrieval effectiveness, Part 1. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, (24)2, 1973, 87-100.Google ScholarCross Ref
- 8.Hannah, D. Overview of the first TREC conference. ln: Korfhage, R., Rasmussen, E., Willett, P., eds. Proceedings of the 16th A CM Sigir Conference on Research and Development of lnformation Retrieval. Pittsburgh, 1993. New York, N.Y.: ACM Press, 1993, 36-47. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 9.Harman, D. Overview of the second text retrieval conference (TREC-2). Information Processing & Management, (31)3, 1995, 271-289. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 10.Hammn, D. (Ed.). Overview of the Third Text REtrieval Conference (TREC-3). National Institute of Standards and Technology Special Publication 500- 225, Gaithersburg, Md. 20899.Google Scholar
- 11.Harman, D. (Ed.). Overview of the Fourth Text REtrieval Conference (TREC-4). National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Md. 20899.Google Scholar
- 12.Harman, D.K. The TREC Conferences. In: Sparck Jones, K. and Willitt, P., eds. Readings in Information Retrieval. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann, 1997, 247-256. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 13.Harter, S.P. Psychological Relevance and information Science. Journal of American Society for Information Science, (43), 1992, 602-615.Google Scholar
- 14.Hillman, D.J. The Notion of Relevance (I). American Documentation, (15) 1, 1964, 26-34.Google ScholarCross Ref
- 15.Ingwersen, P. Cognitive perspectives of information retrieval interaction: Elements of a cognitive IR theory. Journal of Documentation, (52)1, 1996,3-50.Google ScholarCross Ref
- 16.Keen, E.M. Presenting results of experimental retrieval comparisons. Information Processing & Management, (28)4, 1992, 491-502. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 17.Ingwersen, P. Search procedures in the library analysed from the cognitive point of view. Journal of Documentation, (38), 1982, 165-19 I.Google Scholar
- 18.Robertson, S.E. and Hancock-Beaulieu, M.M. On the evaluation of IR systems. Information Processing & Management, (28)4, 1992, 457-466. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 19.Saracevic, T. Evaluation of Evaluation in Information Retrieval. In: Fox, E.A., ingwersen, P., Fidel, R., eds. Proceedings of the 18th ACM Sigir Conference on Research and Development of lnformation Retrieval. Seattle, 1995. New York, N.Y.: ACM Press, 1995, 138-146. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 20.Saracevic, T. Relevance: A review of and a framework for the thinking on the notion in Information Science. Journal of American Society for information Science, (26), 1975, 321-343.Google Scholar
- 21.Saracevic, T. Relevance reconsidered '96. In: Ingwersen, P. and Pors, N.O., eds. Information Science: Integration in Perspective. Copenhagen: Royal School of Librarianship, 1996, 201-218.Google Scholar
- 22.Saracevic, T., Mokros, H. & Su, L.T. Nature of interaction between users and intermediaries in on-line searching: qualitative analysis. ASIS Proceeding, 1990, 47-54.Google Scholar
- 23.Saracevic, T. et al. A Study of Information Seeking and Retrieving: 1. Background and Methodology. In: Sparck Jones, K. and Willitt, P., eds. Readings in Information Retrieval. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann, 1997, 175-190. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 24.Pao, M.L. Term and citation retrieval: a field study. Information Processing & Management, (29) 1, 1993, 95-112. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 25.Tenopir, C. & Cahn, P. Target & Freestyle: Dialog and Mead join the relevance ranks. On-line, (May), 1994, 31-47. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 26.van Rijsbergen, C.J. Information Retrieval. Second edition. London: Butterworths. 1979. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 27.Wallis, P., Thorn, J.A. Relevance judgements for assessing recall. Information Processing & Management, (32)3, 1996, 273-286. Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- Measures of relative relevance and ranked half-life: performance indicators for interactive IR
Recommendations
Evaluation Measures for Relevance and Credibility in Ranked Lists
ICTIR '17: Proceedings of the ACM SIGIR International Conference on Theory of Information RetrievalRecent discussions on alternative facts, fake news, and post truth politics have motivated research on creating technologies that allow people not only to access information, but also to assess the credibility of the information presented to them by ...
On the robustness of relevance measures with incomplete judgments
SIGIR '07: Proceedings of the 30th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrievalWe investigate the robustness of three widely used IR relevance measures for large data collections with incomplete judgments. The relevance measures we consider are the bpref measure introduced by Buckley and Voorhees [7], the inferred average ...
Relative Relevance Feedback in Image Retrieval
ICME '12: Proceedings of the 2012 IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and ExpoWe propose a relative relevance feedback method for image retrieval systems. Relevance feedback is an effective method to modify a user's query by selecting relevant and irrelevant items in the search result. However, users cannot always find exactly ...
Comments