skip to main content
10.1145/2910019.2910027acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicegovConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

State-of-the-Art Assessment on the Implementations of International Core Data Models for Public Administrations

Published: 01 March 2016 Publication History

Abstract

Public administrations are often still organised in vertical, closed silos. The lack of common data standards (common data models and reference data) for exchanging information between administrations in a cross-domain and/or cross-border setting stands in the way of digital public services and automated flow of information between public administrations. Core data models address this issue, but are often created within the closed environment of a country or region and within one policy domain. A lack of insight exists in understanding and managing the life-cycle of these initiatives on public administration information systems for data modelling and data exchange. In this paper, we outline state-of-the-art implementations and vocabularies linked to the core data models. In particular we inventoried and selected existing core data models and identified tendencies in current practices based on the criteria creation, use, maintenance and coordination. Based on the analysis, this survey suggest research directions for policy and information management studies pointing to best practices regarding core data model implementations and their role in linking isolated data silos within a cross-country context. Finally we highlight the differences in their coordination and maintenance, depending on the state of creation and use.

References

[1]
ISA. 2010. European Interoperability Framework (EIF) for European public services. p. 9. http://ec.europa.eu/isa/documents/isa_annex_ii_eif_en.pdf.
[2]
European Commission. 2014. Study on eGovernment and the Reduction of Administrative Burden. p. 149.
[3]
Pardo, T.A., Nam, T. and Burke, G.B. 2011. E-Government Interoperability: Interaction of Policy, Management, and Technology Dimensions. Social Science Computer Review. p. 10.
[4]
Colpaert, P., et al. 2014. Quantifying the Interoperability of Open Government Datasets. Computer, 2014(10): p. 50--56.
[5]
Bovalis, K., et al., Promoting Interoperability in Europe's E-Government. Computer, 47(10): p. 25--33.
[6]
Wood, D. 2011. Linking government data. Springer Science & Business Media.112 p.
[7]
Janowicz, K., et al. 2014. Five stars of linked data vocabulary use. Semantic Web, 5(3): p. 173--176.
[8]
Colpaert, P., et al. 2014. Painless URI dereferencing using The DataTank, in The Semantic Web: ESWC 2014 Satellite Events, Springer. p. 304--309.
[9]
Melnik, S. and Decker, S. 2000. A layered approach to information modeling and interoperability on the web. In Proc. of the ECDL'00 Workshop on the Semantic Web. (Lisbon, Portugal, september 18-20, 2000).
[10]
Weibel, S. 1997. The Dublin Core: a simple content description model for electronic resources. Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 24(1): p. 9--11.
[11]
Sheridan, J. and Tennison, J. 2010. Linking UK Government Data. In LDOW 2010, (North-Carolina, April 27, 2010). p. 4.
[12]
Vetterli, T., Vaduva, A. and Staudt, M. 2000. Metadata standards for data warehousing: open information model vs. common warehouse metadata. ACM Sigmod Record, 29(3): p. 68--75.
[13]
Chan, L.M. and Zeng, M.L. 2006. Metadata interoperability and standardization-A study of methodology, Part II. D-Lib magazine, 12(6): p. 4.
[14]
Debreceny, R., et al. 2010. Does it add up? Early evidence on the data quality of XBRL filings to the SEC. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 29(3): p. 296--306.
[15]
Hunter, J. 2003. Enhancing the semantic interoperability of multimedia through a core ontology. Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, IEEE Transactions on, 13(1): p. 49--58.
[16]
Mynarz, J. 2014. Integration of public procurement data using linked data. Journal of Systems Integration, 5(4): p. 19--31.
[17]
ISA. CORE VOCABULARIES. {Action description} 2014; Available http://ec.europa.eu/isa/actions/documents/eudig12a-1401-i01-core-vocabularies-lr_en.pdf.
[18]
European Commission. 2014. Handbook for using the Core Vocabularies. ISA Programme. p. 10. https://joinup.ec.europa.eu/site/core_vocabularies/Core_Vocabularies_user_handbook/Handbook-for-using-the-Core-Vocabularies_v0.50.pdf.
[19]
Federal Counsel. 2010. Agency Information, Exchange Functional, Standards Evaluation. Adoption and use of the National Information Exchange Model (NIEM). USA Federal CIO Counsel. p. 120.
[20]
De Vocht, L., et al. 2014. Converging on semantics to ensure local government data reuse. In Proceedings of the 5th workshop on Semantics for Smarter Cities (SSC14), 13th International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC). 6 p.
[21]
European Commission. 2014. Metadata management requirements and existing solutions in EU Institutions and Member States. ISA Programme. http://ec.europa.eu/isa/documents/metadata-management-requirements-and-existing-solutions-in-eu-institutions-and-member-states_en.pdf.
[22]
Suarez-Figueroa et al. 2012. Ontology Engineering in a Networked World, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg: p. 25--27.
[23]
Burgess, M. 2006. Comparative federalism: Theory and practice. Routledge. 349 p.
[24]
Breton, A. 2000. Federalism and Decentralization: Ownership Rights and the Superiority of Federalism. The Journal of Federalism 30 (2). 1

Cited By

View all
  • (2016)OSLOProceedings of the International Conference on Electronic Governance and Open Society: Challenges in Eurasia10.1145/3014087.3014096(126-134)Online publication date: 22-Nov-2016
  1. State-of-the-Art Assessment on the Implementations of International Core Data Models for Public Administrations

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    ICEGOV '15-16: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance
    March 2016
    453 pages
    ISBN:9781450336406
    DOI:10.1145/2910019
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 01 March 2016

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. Core Data Models
    2. Governance
    3. Interoperability
    4. Inventory
    5. Lifecycle
    6. eGovernment

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Conference

    ICEGOV '15-16

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 350 of 865 submissions, 40%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)8
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
    Reflects downloads up to 01 Mar 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2016)OSLOProceedings of the International Conference on Electronic Governance and Open Society: Challenges in Eurasia10.1145/3014087.3014096(126-134)Online publication date: 22-Nov-2016

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Figures

    Tables

    Media

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media