skip to main content
10.1145/2910674.2935835acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagespetraConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Examining User Experiences in a Mobile Augmented Reality Tourist Guide

Authors Info & Claims
Published:29 June 2016Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper presents a mobile augmented reality guide for cultural heritage. The main focus of this research was to examine user experiences in a mobile augmented reality tourist guide. Real-time tracking was performed using either computer vision techniques or sensors technologies (i.e. GPS and gyroscopes). The main features of the AR touristic application were evaluated with 30 healthy volunteers (15 males and 15 females). Results showed that users found the sensor approach easy to use and intuitive. The majority reported fast adaptation to the AR application. As far as gender differences are concerned, females were more satisfied with the AR experience compared to males and also reported higher temporal demand. Overall, feedback showed that AR technology has all the potential to be used for tourist guides since it is easy to use and intuitive.

References

  1. Azuma, R.T. 1997. A Survey of Augmented Reality. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments. 6, 4, 355--385, DOI=10.1162/pres.1997.6.4.355 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Milgram, P. and Kishino, F. 1994. A taxonomy of mixed reality visual displays, IEICE Transactions on Information Systems. E77-D(12):1321--1329.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Mann, S. 2002. Mediated Reality with implementations for everyday life, http://wearcam.org/presence_connect/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Braz, J.M. and Pereira, J.M., 2008. TARCAST: Taxonomy for augmented reality CASTing with web support. The International Journal of Virtual Reality. IPI Press, 7(4): 47--56.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Hugues, O., Fuchs, P. and Nannipieri, O., 2011. New augmented reality taxonomy: Technologies and features of augmented environment. Handbook of augmented reality. Springer, 47--63.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Normand, J.-M., Servières, M. and Moreau, G., 2012. A new typology of augmented reality applications. In Proceedings of the 3rd Augmented Human International Conference (AH'12). Article No. 18, ACM, 445--453. DOI= http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?doid=2160125.2160143 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Liarokapis, F., Brujic-Okretic, V. and Papakonstantinou, S. 2006. Exploring Urban Environments using Virtual and Augmented Reality, Journal of Virtual Reality and Broadcasting, GRAPP 2006 Special Issue, Digital Peer Publishing, 3(5): 1--13.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Feiner, S., MacIntyre, B., Hollerer, T., and Webster, A. 1997. A touring machine: prototyping 3D mobile augmented reality systems for exploring the urban environment. In Proceedings of the 1st International Symposium on Wearable Computers. IEEE Computer Society, 74--81, DOI=10.1109/ISWC.1997.629922 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Höllerer, T., Feiner, S.K., Terauchi, T., Rashid, G. and Hallaway, D. 1999. Exploring MARS: developing indoor and outdoor user interfaces to a mobile augmented reality system. Computers and Graphics. Elsevier, 23(6): 779--785. DOI= 10.1016/S0097-8493(99)00103-XGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Piekarski, W. and Thomas, B.H. 2002. Unifying Augmented Reality and Virtual Reality User Interfaces. Technical Report, University of South Australia, Adelaide.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Umlauf, E. Piringer, Reitmayr, G. and Schmalstieg, D. 2002. ARLib: The Augmented Library. In Proceedings of the First IEEE International Augmented Reality ToolKit Workshop. Darmstadt, Germany.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Vlahakis, V., Ioannidis et al., 2002. Archeoguide: An Augmented Reality Guide for Archaeological Sites. Computer Graphics and Applications 22, 5, IEEE Computer Society, 52--60, DOI= 10.1109/MCG.2002.1028726 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Zoellner, M. Pagani, A., et al., 2008. Reality Filtering: A Visual Time Machine in Augmented Reality. In Proceedings of the 9th International Symposium on Virtual Reality, Archaeology and Cultural Heritage (VAST 2008). Eurographics, Braga, Portugal, 2-5 Dec, 71--77, DOI=10.2312/VAST/VAST08/071-077 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Herbst, I., Braun, A.K., McCall, R. and Broll, W. 2008. TimeWarp: interactive time travel with a mobile mixed reality game. In Proceedings of the 10th international conference on Human computer interaction with mobile devices and services (MobileHCI 2008). ACM Press, 235--244, DOI=10.1145/1409240.1409266 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Morrison, A., Jacucci, G., Peltonen, P., Juustila, A., Reitmayr, G. 2008. Using locative games to evaluate hybrid technology. Evaluating Player Experiences in Location Aware Games workshop, British HCI 2008. Liverpool, September.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Liarokapis, F., Sylaiou, S. and Mountain, D. 2008. Personalizing Virtual and Augmented Reality for Cultural Heritage Indoor and Outdoor Experiences. In Proceedings of the 9th International Symposium on Virtual Reality, Archaeology and Cultural Heritage (VAST 2008). Eurographics, Braga, Portugal, 2-5 Dec, 55--62. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Han, D.I., Jung, T. and Gibson, A. 2014. Dublin AR: implementing augmented reality in tourism. In Information and Communication Technologies in Tourism 2014, Springer, 511--523. DOI=10.1007/978-3-319-03973-2_37Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Kourouthanassis, P., Boletsis, C., Bardaki, C. and Chasanidou, D. 2015. Tourists responses to mobile augmented reality travel guides: The role of emotions on adoption behavior. Pervasive and Mobile Computing. Elsevier, 18, 71--87. DOI=10.1016/j.pmcj.2014.08.009 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Tsai, R. 1987. A versatile camera calibration technique for high-accuracy 3D machine vision metrology using off-the-shelf TV cameras and lenses. Robotics and Automation. 3(4), 323--344.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Pollefeys, M., Koch, R. and Van Gool, L., 1999. Self-Calibration and Metric Reconstruction in spite of Varying and Unknown Intrinsic Camera Parameters. Hingham, MA, USA, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 7--25. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Zhang, Z. 2000. A flexible new technique for camera calibration. Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence. 22(11), 1330--1334. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Levenberg, K., 1944. A Method for the Solution of Certain Non-Linear Problems in Least Squares. Quarterly of Applied Mathematics. Volume 2, 164--168.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Marquardt, D. 1963. An Algorithm for Least-Squares Estimation of Nonlinear Parameters. SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics. 11(2), 431--441.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Riba, E. 2014. Real Time pose estimation of a textured object. OpenCV 3.0.0-dev documentation, OpenCV Tutorials, Available at: http://docs.opencv.org/3.0-beta/doc/tutorials/calib3d/real_time_pose/real_time_pose.html#realtimeposeestimation.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Rublee, E., Rabaud, V., Konolige, K. and Bradski, G. 2011. ORB: an efficient alternative to SIFT or SURF. In Proceedings of the 2011 International Conference on Computer Vision, IEEE Computer Society, Barcelona, Spain, 2564--2571. DOI= 10.1109/ICCV.2011.6126544 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Möller, T. and Trubore, B. 1997. Fast, Minimum Storage Ray/Triangle Intersection. Journal of Graphics Tools, Taylor & Francis, 2(1), 21--28. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Kaehler, O., Prisacariu, V.A., Ren, C.Y., Sun, X., Torr, T. and David Murray 2015. Very High Frame Rate Volumetric Integration of Depth Images on Mobile Devices. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, IEEE Computer Society, 21(11), 1241--1250, DOI= 10.1109/TVCG.2015.2459891 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  1. Examining User Experiences in a Mobile Augmented Reality Tourist Guide

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        PETRA '16: Proceedings of the 9th ACM International Conference on PErvasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments
        June 2016
        455 pages
        ISBN:9781450343374
        DOI:10.1145/2910674

        Copyright © 2016 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 29 June 2016

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article
        • Research
        • Refereed limited

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader