skip to main content
10.1145/2911451.2914728acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesirConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

Pearson Rank: A Head-Weighted Gap-Sensitive Score-Based Correlation Coefficient

Published: 07 July 2016 Publication History

Abstract

One way of evaluating the reusability of a test collection is to determine whether removing the unique contributions of some system would alter the preference order between that system and others. Rank correlation measures such as Kendall's tau are often used for this purpose. Rank correlation measures are appropriate for ordinal measures in which only preference order is important, but many evaluation measures produce system scores in which both the preference order and the magnitude of the score difference are important. Such measures are referred to as interval. Pearson's rho offers one way in which correlation can be computed over results from an interval measure such that smaller errors in the gap size are preferred. When seeking to improve over existing systems, we care the most about comparisons among the best systems. For that purpose we prefer head-weighed measures such as tau_AP, which is designed for ordinal data. No present head weighted measure fully leverages the information present in interval effectiveness measures. This paper introduces such a measure, referred to as Pearson Rank.

References

[1]
B. Carterette. Robust test collections for retrieval evaluation. In SIGIR, pages 55--62, 2007.
[2]
N. Gao and D. Oard. A head-weighted gap-sensitive correlation coefficient. In SIGIR, pages 799--802, 2015.
[3]
M. G. Kendall. A new measure of rank correlation. Biometrika, pages 81--93, 1938.
[4]
K. Pearson. Note on regression and inheritance in the case of two parents. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, 58(347--352):240--242, 1895.
[5]
E. M. Voorhees. Variations in relevance judgments and the measurement of retrieval effectiveness. Information processing & management, 36(5):697--716, 2000.
[6]
E. Yilmaz et al. A new rank correlation coefficient for information retrieval. In SIGIR, pages 587--594, 2008.

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)HC3: A Suite of Test Collections for CLIR Evaluation over Informal TextProceedings of the 46th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval10.1145/3539618.3591893(2880-2889)Online publication date: 19-Jul-2023
  • (2022)An adaptive decision-making system supported on user preference predictions for human–robot interactive communicationUser Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction10.1007/s11257-022-09321-233:2(359-403)Online publication date: 9-Apr-2022
  • (2021)DiffIR: Exploring Differences in Ranking Models' BehaviorProceedings of the 44th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval10.1145/3404835.3462784(2595-2599)Online publication date: 11-Jul-2021
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Pearson Rank: A Head-Weighted Gap-Sensitive Score-Based Correlation Coefficient

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image ACM Conferences
      SIGIR '16: Proceedings of the 39th International ACM SIGIR conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval
      July 2016
      1296 pages
      ISBN:9781450340694
      DOI:10.1145/2911451
      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Sponsors

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      Published: 07 July 2016

      Permissions

      Request permissions for this article.

      Check for updates

      Author Tags

      1. correlation coefficient
      2. evaluation metric

      Qualifiers

      • Short-paper

      Funding Sources

      • NPRP
      • NSF

      Conference

      SIGIR '16
      Sponsor:

      Acceptance Rates

      SIGIR '16 Paper Acceptance Rate 62 of 341 submissions, 18%;
      Overall Acceptance Rate 792 of 3,983 submissions, 20%

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)9
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2
      Reflects downloads up to 05 Mar 2025

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      Cited By

      View all
      • (2023)HC3: A Suite of Test Collections for CLIR Evaluation over Informal TextProceedings of the 46th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval10.1145/3539618.3591893(2880-2889)Online publication date: 19-Jul-2023
      • (2022)An adaptive decision-making system supported on user preference predictions for human–robot interactive communicationUser Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction10.1007/s11257-022-09321-233:2(359-403)Online publication date: 9-Apr-2022
      • (2021)DiffIR: Exploring Differences in Ranking Models' BehaviorProceedings of the 44th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval10.1145/3404835.3462784(2595-2599)Online publication date: 11-Jul-2021
      • (2018)When Rank Order Isn't EnoughProceedings of the 27th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management10.1145/3269206.3271751(397-406)Online publication date: 17-Oct-2018
      • (2017)What Does Affect the Correlation Among Evaluation Measures?ACM Transactions on Information Systems10.1145/310637136:2(1-40)Online publication date: 29-Aug-2017
      • (2017)Weighted Similarity: A New Similarity Measure for Document Ranking FeaturesArtificial Intelligence Trends in Intelligent Systems10.1007/978-3-319-57261-1_27(273-280)Online publication date: 7-Apr-2017

      View Options

      Login options

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      Figures

      Tables

      Media

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media