Christopher Mascaro
Sean P. Goggins
ABSTRACT
Technology has been promoted as a way to facilitate interactions across disparate groups of people. Political discourse has been historically constrained by geographic proximity of participants. The introduction of the Internet and specifically social media has altered these geographic constraints and political discourse is now one of the most prevalent activities in social media. As more individuals begin to use technology for political activity, understanding how the technology is used becomes increasingly important. Previous research exploring political discourse on social media has focused on one discrete event or a narrow time period. This narrow focus limits the understanding of the complex election environment. This study takes a longitudinal approach to examine the use of conversational syntactical features in Twitter derived from a 53 million Twitter message corpus collected during the 2012 Presidential Election (August 20, 2012 -- November 13, 2012). This study identifies that, although candidates and media are the most talked about and talked to, these interactions elicit no response. The lack of response is counter to many of the perceived benefits of social media. These findings have implications for understanding how the public uses social media to engage with political candidates and the possibilities for how technology could be altered to better facilitate these interactions.
- Agre, P. E. 2002. Real-time Politics: The Internet and the Political Process. The Information Society. 18, 311--331.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Agre, P. E. 2004 The Practical Republic: Social Skills and the Progress of Citizenship. In Community in the Digital Age, A. Feenberg, Ed Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
- Ancu, M. and Cozma, R. 2009. MySpace Politics: Uses and Gratifications of Befriending Candidates. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media. 53, 4, 567--583.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Bakshy, E., Hofman, J. M., Mason, W. A., and Watts, D. J. 2011. Everyone's an influencer: quantifying influence on twitter. Proceedings of the fourth ACM international conference on Web search and data mining, 65--74. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Black, A., Mascaro, C., Gallagher, M., and Goggins, S. 2012. TwitterZombie: Architecture for Capturing, Socially Transforming and Analyzing the Twittersphere. ACM Group. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Bruns, A. and Stieglitz, S. 2012. Quantitative approaches to comparing communication patterns on Twitter. Journal of Technology in Human Services. 30, 3--4, 160--185.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Bruns, A. and Stieglitz, S. 2012. Quantitative approaches to comparing communication patterns on Twitter. Journal of Technology in Human Services. 30, 3--4, 160--185.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Cha, M., Haddadi, H., Benevenuto, F., and Gummadi, K. P. 2010. Measuring User Influence in Twitter: The Million Follower Fallacy. ICWSM. 4th.Google Scholar
- Dahlberg, L. 2001. The Internet and Democratic Discourse: Exploring the prospects of online deliberative forums extending the public sphere. Information, Community & Society. 4, 4, 615--633.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Davis, R. 1998 The web of politics: The Internet's impact on the American political system. Oxford University Press, Inc. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Dewey, J. 1927 The Public and Its Problems. Holt Publishers.Google Scholar
- Diakopoulos, N. A. and Shamma, D. A. 2010. Characterizing Debate Performance via Aggregated Twitter Seniment. CHI. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Fiore, A. T., LeeTiernan, S., and Smith, M. A. 2002. Observed Behavior and Perceived Value of Authors in Usenet Newsgroups: Bridging the Gap. CHI. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Fisher, D., Smith, M., and Welser, H. T. 2006. You are Who You Talk to: Detecting Roles in Usenet Newgroups. Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Fishkin, J. S. 1997 The voice of the people: Public opinion and democracy. Yale Univ Pr.Google Scholar
- Foot, K. A. and Schneider, S. M. 2002. Online Action in Campaign 2000: An Exploratory Analysis of the U.S. Political Web Sphere. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media. 46, 2, 222--244.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Freelon, D. G. 2010. Analyzing online political discussion using three models of democratic communication. new media & society. 12, 7, 1172--1190.Google Scholar
- Freelon, D. G. 2010. Analyzing Online Political Discussion Using Three Modes of Democratic Communication. New Media & Society. 12, 1172--1190.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Gonzalez-Bailon, S., Kaltenbrunner, A., and Banchs, R. E. 2010. The structure of political discussion networks: a model for the analysis of online deliberation. Journal of Information Technology. 2010, 1--14.Google Scholar
- Habermas, J. 1984 The theory of communicative action. Beacon Press.Google Scholar
- Habermas, J. 1991 The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society. MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Habermas, J., Lennox, S., and Lennox, F. 1974. The Public Sphere: An Encyclopedia Article. New German Critique. 3, 49--55.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Habermas, J. 1989. The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere, trans. Thomas Burger. Cambridge: MIT Press. 85, 85--92.Google Scholar
- Honeycutt, C. and Herring, S. C. 2009. Beyond Microblogging: Conversation and Collaboration via Twitter. Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. 43. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Huberman, B., Romero, D., and Wu, F. 2008. Social networks that matter: Twitter under the microscope.Google Scholar
- Jacobson, J. and Mascaro, C. 2016. Movember: Twitter conversations of a hairy social movement. Social Media & Society. Social Media & Society. in press.Google Scholar
- Kelly, J., Fisher, D., and Smith, M. 2005. Debate, division and diversity: Political discourse networks in USENET Groups. Online Deliberation Conference.Google Scholar
- Lippmann, W. 1925 The Phantom Public. Transaction Publishing.Google Scholar
- Marwick, A. E. and boyd, d. 2011. I tweet honestly, I tweet passionately: Twitter users, context collapse, and the imagined audience. New Media Society. 13.Google Scholar
- Mascaro, C., Agosto, D., and Goggins, S. 2016. The Method to the Madness: The 2012 United States Presidential Election Twitter Corpus. International Conference on Social Media & Society.Google Scholar
- Mascaro, C. and Goggins, S. 2015. Technologically Mediated Political Discourse During a Nationally Televised GOP Primary Debate. Journal of Information Technology & Politics. 12, 3, 252--269.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Mascaro, C., Black, A., Gallagher, M., and Goggins, S. 2012. The 2012 Wisconsin Gubernatorial Recall Twitter Corpus. Available at SSRN 2159303.Google Scholar
- Mascaro, C., Novak, A., and Goggins, S. 2012. Shepherding and Censorship: Discourse Management in the Tea Party Patriots Facebook Group. Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (E-Government Track). 45. Google ScholarDigital Library
- McCarthy, J. D. and Zald, M. N. 1987 Social Movements in an Organizational Society: Collected Essays. Transaction.Google Scholar
- Papacharissi, Z. A. 2002. The virtual sphere: The internet as a public sphere. New Media & Society. 4, 1, 9--27.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Papacharissi, Z. A. 2004. Democracy online: civility, politeness, and the democratic potential of online political discussion groups. New Media & Society. 6, 2, 259--283.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Papacharissi, Z. A. 2010 A Private Sphere: Democracy in a Digital Age. Polity Press.Google Scholar
- Putnam, R. 2001 Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
- Quercia, D., Ellis, J., Capra, L., and Crowcroft, J. 2012. Tracking "Gross Community Happiness" from Tweets. CSCW. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Robertson, S. P., Vatrapu, R. K., and Medina, R. 2009. The Social Life of Social Networks: Facebook Linkage Patterns in the 2008 U.S. Presidential Election. International Digital Government Research. 6--15. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Robertson, S. P., Vatrapu, R. K., and Medina, R. 2010. Off the wall political discourse: Facebook use in the 2008 U.S. Presidential election. Information Polity. 15, 11--31. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Rossi, L. and Magnani, M. 2012. Conversation Practices and Network Structure in Twitter. Sixth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and ....Google Scholar
- Shamma, D. A., Kennedy, L., and Churchill, E. F. 2009. Tweet the debates: understanding community annotation of uncollected sources. Proceedings of the first SIGMM workshop on Social media. 3--10. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Sweetser, K. D. and Weaver Lariscy, R. 2008. Candidates Make Good Friends: An Analysis of Candidates' Uses of Facebook. International Journal of Strategic Communication. 2, 3, 175--198.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Viegas, F. B. and Smith, M. 2004. Newsgroup Crowds and AuthorLines: Visualizing the Activity of Individuals in Conversational Cyberspaces. Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. 37. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Walton, D. 2007. Revitalizing the public sphere: The current system of discourse and the need for the participative design of social action. Systemic Practice and Action Research. 20, 5, 369--386.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Werry, C. C. 1996 Linguistic and interactional features of Internet Relay Chat. In Computer-mediated communication: Linguistic, social and cross-cultural perspectives, S. C. Herring, Ed John Benjamins.Google Scholar
- White, S. K. 1989 The recent work of Jürgen Habermas: Reason, justice and modernity. Cambridge Univ Pr.Google Scholar
- Williams, C. and Gulati, G. J. 2007. Social Networks in Political Campaigns: Facebook and the 2006 Midterm Elections. American Political Science Association.Google Scholar
- Wojcieszak, M. E. and Mutz, D. 2009. Online Groups and Political Discourse: Do Online Discussion Spaces Facilitate Exposure to Political Disagreement? Journal of Communication. 59, 2009, 40--56.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Yardi, S. and Boyd, D. 2010. Dynamic debates: An analysis of group polarization over time on twitter. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society. 30, 5, 316--327.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Yardi, S. and boyd, d. 2010. Tweeting from the Town Square: Measuring Geographic Local Networks. ICWSM. 4th.Google Scholar
- Zelenkauskaite, A. and Herring, S. C. 2008. Television-mediated conversation: Coherence in Italian iTV SMS Chat. Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. 41. Google ScholarDigital Library
Recommendations
The 2014 Indian elections on Twitter
The study examines Twitter political campaigns in the 2014 Indian general election.It also examines the role of internet and first time voters in electoral success.New-and-upcoming parties used Twitter for self-promotion and media validation.The winning ...
Truthy: mapping the spread of astroturf in microblog streams
WWW '11: Proceedings of the 20th international conference companion on World wide webOnline social media are complementing and in some cases replacing person-to-person social interaction and redefining the diffusion of information. In particular, microblogs have become crucial grounds on which public relations, marketing, and political ...
Celebrity's self-disclosure on Twitter and parasocial relationships
This study investigated how celebrities' self-disclosure on personal social media accounts, particularly Twitter, affects fans' perceptions. An online survey was utilized among a sample of 429 celebrity followers on Twitter. Results demonstrated that ...
Comments