skip to main content
10.1145/2914920.2915003acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesperdisConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Supporting efficient task switching in a work environment with a pervasive display

Published:20 June 2016Publication History

ABSTRACT

Switching tasks and being ready for the next appointment is a daily routine in todays office work. In this paper we report an experiment "in the wild" with Ambient Timer, an ambient light display designed to continuously and unobtrusively remind users of an upcoming appointment in the periphery of their attention. As a pilot study we did a participatory design study and used the resulting pattern in the evaluation. Our results suggest that Ambient Timer is well suited to support users in being on time for their appointments as well as wrapping up their current task in a sensible manner before having to get up. Users feel less distracted and more in the flow when using Ambient Timer than when using their regular state of the art reminding techniques.

References

  1. Jeremy Birnholtz, Lindsay Reynolds, Eli Luxenberg, Carl Gutwin, and Maryam Mustafa. 2010. Awareness beyond the desktop: exploring attention and distraction with a projected peripheral-vision display. In Proceedings of Graphics Interface 2010 (GI '10). Canadian Information Processing Society, 55--62. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1839214.1839225 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. R. A. Block. 1992. Prospective and Retrospective Duration Judgment: The Role of Information Processing and Memory. In Time, Action and Cognition.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Richard A. Block, Peter A. Hancock, and Dan Zakay. 2010. How cognitive load affects duration judgments: A meta-analytic review. Acta Psychologica 134, 3 (2010), 330--343. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.03.006Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Margaret M. Bradley and Peter J. Lang. 1994. Measuring emotion: The self-assessment manikin and the semantic differential. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry 25, 1 (1994), 49--59. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0005-7916(94)90063-9Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Pierre Dragicevic and Stéphane Huot. 2002. SpiraClock: a continuous and non-intrusive display for upcoming events. In CHI '02 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems (CHI EA '02). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 604--605. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. James Fogarty, Scott E. Hudson, Christopher G. Atkeson, Daniel Avrahami, Jodi Forlizzi, Sara Kiesler, Johnny C. Lee, and Jie Yang. 2005. Predicting human interruptibility with sensors. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 12, 1 (2005), 119--146. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1057237.1057243 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. William R. Hazlewood, Erik Stolterman, and Kay Connelly. 2011. Issues in evaluating ambient displays in the wild: two case studies. In Proc. CHI 2011 (CHI'11). ACM, New York, NY, USA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. William J. Horrey, Christopher D. Wickens, and Kyle P. Consalus. 2006. Modeling Drivers Visual Attention Allocation While Interacting With In-Vehicle Technologies. Journal of Experimental Psychology 12 (2006), 67--78.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Shamsi T. Iqbal and Eric Horvitz. 2010. Notifications and Awareness: A Field Study of Alert Usage and Preferences. In Proceedings of the 2010 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW '10). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 27--30. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1718918.1718926 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Hiroshi Ishii, Craig Wisneski, Scott Brave, Andrew Dahley, Matt Gorbet, Brygg Ulmer, and Paul Yarin. 1998. ambientROOM: Integrating Ambient Media with Architectural Space. In Proc. CHI 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Siân Lindley, Robert Corish, Elsa Kosmack Vaara, Pedro Ferreira, and Vygandas Simbelis. 2013. Changing Perspectives of Time in HCI. In CHI '13 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '13). 3211--3214. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Gloria Mark, Victor M. Gonzalez, and Justin Harris. 2005. No task left behind?: examining the nature of fragmented work. In Proc. CHI 2005 (CHI'05). ACM, New York, NY, USA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Reed Martin and Henry Holtzman. 2011. Kairoscope: Managing Time Perception and Scheduling Through Social Event Coordination. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '11). 1969--1978. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Tara Matthews, Anind K. Dey, Jennifer Mankoff, Scott Carter, and Tye Rattenbury. 2004. A toolkit for managing user attention in peripheral displays. In Proc. UIST. 10. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1029632.1029676 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. D. Scott McCrickard and C. M. Chewar. 2003. Attuning notification design to user goals and attention costs. Commun. ACM 46 (2003), 67--72. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/636772.636800 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. D. Scott McCrickard, C. M. Chewar, Jacob P. Somervell, and Ali Ndiwalana. 2003. A model for notification systems evaluation assessing user goals for multitasking activity. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 10 (2003), 312--338. Issue 4. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/966930.966933 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Daniel C. McFarlane and Kara A. Latorella. 2002. The scope and importance of human interruption in human-computer interaction design. Hum.-Comput. Interact. 17 (2002), 1--61. Issue 1. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/S15327051HCI1701_1 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Susanne Mckee and Ken Nakayama. 1984. The detection of motion in the peripheral visual field. Vision Resources 24 (1984), 25--32.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Heiko Müller, Anastasia Kazakova, Martin Pielot, Wilko Heuten, and Susanne Boll. 2012. Unobtrusively reminding users of upcoming tasks with ambient light: Ambient Timer. In Proceedings of the 7th Nordic Conference on Human--Computer Interaction: Making Sense Through Design (NordiCHI '12). 801--802. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2399016.2399155 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Heiko Müller, Anastasia Kazakova, Martin Pielot, Wilko Heuten, and Susanne Boll. 2013. Ambient Timer--Unobtrusively Reminding Users of Upcoming Tasks with Ambient Light. Human Computer Interaction - INTERACT 2013 8117 (2013), 211--228.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Jeanne Nakamura and Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi. 2009. Oxford Handbook of Positive Psychology. Oxford University Press, Chapter Flow Theory and Research, 195--206.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Ronald Rensink. 2002. Change Detection. Annu. Revs. of Psychology 53 (2002), 245--277.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. E. Sokolov. 1963. Higher Nervous Functions: The Orienting Reflex. Annu. Revs. of Physiology 25 (1963), 545--580.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Mark Weiser and John Seely Brown. 1996. Designing calm technology. POWERGRID JOURNAL 1 (1996).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Supporting efficient task switching in a work environment with a pervasive display

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      PerDis '16: Proceedings of the 5th ACM International Symposium on Pervasive Displays
      June 2016
      266 pages
      ISBN:9781450343664
      DOI:10.1145/2914920

      Copyright © 2016 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 20 June 2016

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      PerDis '16 Paper Acceptance Rate28of47submissions,60%Overall Acceptance Rate213of384submissions,55%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader