skip to main content
10.1145/2914920.2915016acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesperdisConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Design implications for interacting with personalised public displays through mobile augmented reality

Published: 20 June 2016 Publication History

Abstract

Due to their situated nature, digital public displays have the potential to provide information and messages to large groups of people. However, in practice, non-customised content typically is not relevant to every passerby, while personalising information tailored to individuals is associated with privacy concerns. Previous research has identified mobile augmented reality as a promising method for keeping digital displays public, yet enabling customised views for interested passersby in a way that retains privacy. By building on this previous work, the aim of this paper is to understand user preferences for interacting with personalised information on digital public displays through their mobile device. The paper reports on a study that was conducted with a prototype augmented reality app and public display system. Findings from the study highlight the need for contextual personalisation based upon user activities and objectives at the time of the interaction. Additionally, interactions should be adaptable between public and covert, depending upon what the user wants to share. Based on these findings the paper presents a series of design implications for personalising public displays.

References

[1]
Florian Alt, Thomas Kubitza, Dominik Bial, Firas Zaidan, Markus Ortel, Björn Zurmaar, Tim Lewen, Alireza Sahami Shirazi, Albrecht Schmidt. 2011. Digifieds: Insights into Deploying Digital Public Notice Areas in the Wild. MUM '11, 165--174.
[2]
Matthias Baldauf and Jasmin Buchta. 2013. From Touchpad to Smart Lens: A Comparative Study on Smartphone Interaction with Public Displays. IJMHCI, 1--20. http://doi.org/10.4018/jmhci.2013040101
[3]
Matthias Baldauf, Katrin Lasinger, and Peter Fröhlich. 2012. Private public screens: detached multi-user interaction with large displays through mobile augmented reality. MUM '12, 2--5.
[4]
Matthias Baldauf, Stefan Suette, and Ulrich Lehner. 2014. Interactive Opinion Polls on Public Displays - Studying Privacy Requirements in the Wild. MobileHCI'14, 495--500.
[5]
Rafael Ballagas and Jennifer G Sheridan. 2005. Sweep and Point & Shoot: Phonecam-Based Interactions for Large Public Displays. CHI EA '05, 1200--1203
[6]
Sebastian Boring, Dominikus Baur, Andreas Butz, Sean Gustafson, and Patrick Baudisch. 2010. Touch projector: mobile interaction through video. CHI'10, 2287--2296. http://doi.org/10.1145/1753326.1753671
[7]
Frederik Brady, David Ledo, Saul Greenberg, and Andreas Butz. 2014. Is Anyone Looking? Mitigating Shoulder Surfing on Public Displays through Awareness and Protection. PerDis '14, 1--6.
[8]
Nigel Davies, Marc Langheinrich, Sarah Clinch, Ivan Elhart, Adrian Friday, Thomas Kubitza, Bholanathsingh Surajbali. 2014. Personalisation and privacy in future pervasive display networks. CHI '14, 2357--2366.
[9]
Anind K. Dey. 2001. Understanding and Using Context. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 4--7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s007790170019
[10]
Mayra Donaji, Barrera Machuca, Winyu Chinthammit, Yi Yang, and Henry Duh. 2014. 3D Mobile Interactions for Public Displays. Siggraph Asia '14, 1--4.
[11]
Kazjon Grace, Rainer Wasinger, Christopher Ackad, Anthony Collins, Oliver Dawson, Richard Gluga, Judy Kay, Martin Tomitsch. 2013. Conveying Interactivity at an Interactive Public Information Display. PerDis '13, 19--24.
[12]
Luke Hespanhol, Martin Tomitsch, Ian Mcarthur, Joel Fredericks, Ronald Schroeter, Marcus Foth. 2015. Vote As You Go: Blending Interfaces For Community Engagement Into The Urban Space. C&T '15, 29--37.
[13]
Elaine M Huang, Anna Koster, and Jan Borchers. 2008. Overcoming Assumptions and Uncovering Practices - When does the Public Really Look at Public Displays?. PERVASIVE'08, 228--243.
[14]
Nemanja Memarovic and Marc Langheinrich. 2010. Beyond Web 2. 0: Challenges in Personalizing for Networked Public Display Environments. Pervasive Personalisation Workshop, held in conjunction with Pervasive 2010. Helsinki, Finland, May 2010.
[15]
Inventors Oren, Eli Zamir, N Y Us, Stephen R Lawrence, and Mountain View. 2010. (12) United States Patent. 2, 12.
[16]
Callum Parker, Martin Tomitsch, Judy Kay, and Matthias Baldauf. 2015. Keeping it Private: an Augmented Reality Approach to Citizen Participation with Public Displays. UbiComp/ISWC'15 Adjunct, 807--812.
[17]
Michael Passingham. 2013. City of London bans data-collecting WiFi smart bins. v3.co.uk. Retrieved February 8, 2016 from http://www.v3.co.uk/v3-uk/news/2288299/city-of-london-bans-datacollecting-wifi-smart-bins
[18]
Fiona Redhead, Andrew Dekker, and Margot Brereton. 2009. A Situated Display for Local Community Participation: The Design and Use of Nnub. 2009 Symposia and Workshops on Ubiquitous, Autonomic and Trusted Computing, 102--107. http://doi.org/10.1109/UIC-ATC.2009.91
[19]
Ronald Schroeter and Marcus Foth. 2009. Discussions in space. OZCHI '09, 381--384. http://doi.org/10.1145/1738826.1738903
[20]
Matthew Sharifi and Terry Payne. 2006. Public Display Advertising Based on Bluetooth Device Presence. Proceedings of the Mobile Interaction with the RealWorldWorkshop (MIRW), 1--4.
[21]
Fabius Steinberger, Marcus Foth, and Florian Alt. 2014. Vote With Your Feet: Local Community Polling on Urban Screens. PerDis '14, 44--49.
[22]
Martin Tomitsch, Christopher Ackad, Oliver Dawson, Luke Hespanhol, and Judy Kay. 2014. Who cares about the Content? An Analysis of Playful Behaviour at a Public Display. PerDis '14, 160--165. http://doi.org/10.1145/2611009.2611016
[23]
Mettina Veenstra, Niels Wouters, Marije Kanis, Stephan Brandenburg, Kevin te Raa, Bart Wigger, Andrew Vande Moere. 2015. Should Public Displays be Interactive? Evaluating the Impact of Interactivity on Audience Engagement. PerDis '15, 15--21.

Cited By

View all
  • (2021)A Longitudinal Study of Pervasive Display PersonalisationACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction10.1145/341835228:1(1-45)Online publication date: 20-Jan-2021
  • (2020)Pervasive displays for public transportProceedings of the 9TH ACM International Symposium on Pervasive Displays10.1145/3393712.3395335(37-45)Online publication date: 4-Jun-2020
  • (2020)Foundations for Designing Public Interactive Displays that Provide Value to UsersProceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3313831.3376532(1-12)Online publication date: 21-Apr-2020
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Design implications for interacting with personalised public displays through mobile augmented reality

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    PerDis '16: Proceedings of the 5th ACM International Symposium on Pervasive Displays
    June 2016
    266 pages
    ISBN:9781450343664
    DOI:10.1145/2914920
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 20 June 2016

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. augmented reality
    2. design implications
    3. digital public displays
    4. interaction methods
    5. personalisation

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Conference

    PerDis '16

    Acceptance Rates

    PerDis '16 Paper Acceptance Rate 28 of 47 submissions, 60%;
    Overall Acceptance Rate 213 of 384 submissions, 55%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)25
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)5
    Reflects downloads up to 05 Mar 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2021)A Longitudinal Study of Pervasive Display PersonalisationACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction10.1145/341835228:1(1-45)Online publication date: 20-Jan-2021
    • (2020)Pervasive displays for public transportProceedings of the 9TH ACM International Symposium on Pervasive Displays10.1145/3393712.3395335(37-45)Online publication date: 4-Jun-2020
    • (2020)Foundations for Designing Public Interactive Displays that Provide Value to UsersProceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3313831.3376532(1-12)Online publication date: 21-Apr-2020
    • (2020)Engaging with Children Using Augmented Reality on Clothing to Prevent Them from SmokingBiomedical Visualisation10.1007/978-3-030-43961-3_4(59-94)Online publication date: 2-Jul-2020
    • (2019)A device binding method based on content illumination pattern in public display environmentsPLOS ONE10.1371/journal.pone.021449314:5(e0214493)Online publication date: 10-May-2019
    • (2019)The Impact of Hyperconnectedness on Urban HCIProceedings of the 31st Australian Conference on Human-Computer-Interaction10.1145/3369457.3369521(480-484)Online publication date: 2-Dec-2019
    • (2019)Using Personalisation to improve User Experience in Public Display Systems with Mobile InteractionProceedings of the 17th International Conference on Advances in Mobile Computing & Multimedia10.1145/3365921.3365934(3-12)Online publication date: 2-Dec-2019
    • (2019)ChalkboARdProceedings of the 8th ACM International Symposium on Pervasive Displays10.1145/3321335.3324929(1-6)Online publication date: 12-Jun-2019
    • (2019)From Smart City to Smart Engagement: Exploring Digital and Physical Interactions for Playful City-MakingMaking Smart Cities More Playable10.1007/978-981-13-9765-3_6(107-128)Online publication date: 24-Jul-2019
    • (2018)Augmenting Cities and Architecture with Immersive TechnologiesProceedings of the 4th Media Architecture Biennale Conference10.1145/3284389.3303997(174-177)Online publication date: 13-Nov-2018
    • Show More Cited By

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Figures

    Tables

    Media

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media