skip to main content
10.1145/2931002.2931010acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessapConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Predicting destination using head orientation and gaze direction during locomotion in VR

Published:22 July 2016Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper reports preliminary investigations into the extent to which future directional intention might be reliably inferred from head pose and eye gaze during locomotion. Such findings could help inform the more effective implementation of realistic detailed animation for dynamic virtual agents in interactive first-person crowd simulations in VR, as well as the design of more efficient predictive controllers for redirected walking. In three different studies, with a total of 19 participants, we placed people at the base of a T-shaped virtual hallway environment and collected head position, head orientation, and gaze direction data as they set out to perform a hidden target search task across two rooms situated at right angles to the end of the hallway. Subjects wore an nVisorST50 HMD equipped with an Arrington Research ViewPoint eye tracker; positional data were tracked using a 12-camera Vicon MX40 motion capture system. The hidden target search task was used to blind participants to the actual focus of our study, which was to gain insight into how effectively head position, head orientation and gaze direction data might predict people's eventual choice of which room to search first. Our results suggest that eye gaze data does have the potential to provide additional predictive value over the use of 6DOF head tracked data alone, despite the relatively limited field-of-view of the display we used.

References

  1. Anderson, A. T. 2002. On the human figure in architectural representation. Journal of Architecture Education, 55, 4, 238--246.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Bernadin, D., Kadone, H., Bennequin, D., Sugar, T., Zaoui, M., Berthoz, A. 2012. Gaze anticipation during human locomotion., Experimental Brain Research, 223, 1, 65--78.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Glaholt, M. G. and Reingold, E. M. 2009. The time course of gaze bias in visual decision tasks. Visual Cognition, 17, 8, 1228--1243.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Goldfeather, J. and Interrante, V. 2012. Adaptive redirected walking in a virtual world. IEEE Virtual Reality Workshop on Perceptual Illusions in Virtual Environments, 17--20.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Hodgson, E. and Bachmann, E. 2013. Comparing four approaches to generalized redirected walking: simulation and live user data. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 19, 4, 634--643. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Hollands, M. A., Patla, A. E., Vickers, J. N. 2002 "Look where you're going!": gaze behavior associated with maintaining and changing the direction of locomotion. Exp. Brain Research, 142, 2, 221--230.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Interrante, V., Ries, B., Anderson, L. 2007. Seven league boots: a new metaphor for augmented locomotion through moderately large scale immersive virtual environments. IEEE Symposium on 3D User Interfaces, 167--170.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Karamouzas, I., Skinner, R. and Guy, S. J. 2014. Universal power law governing pedestrian interactions. Physical Review Letters, 113, 23, 238701.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Land, M. F. and Lee, D. N. 1994. Where we look when we steer. Nature, 369, 742--744.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Nescher, T. and Kunz, A. 2012. Analysis of short term path prediction of human locomotion for augmented and virtual reality applications. International Conference on Cyberworlds, 15--22. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Nitzsche, N., Hanebeck, U. D., Schmidt, G. 2004 Motion compression for telepresent walking in large target environments. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 13, 1, 44--60. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Nummenmaa, L., Hyönä J., Hietanen J. K. 2009. I'll walk this way: eyes reveal the direction of locomotion and make passersby look and go the other way. Psychological Science, 20, 12, 1454--1458.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Orquin, J. L. and Loose, S. M. 2013. Attention and choice: a review on eye movements in decision making. Acta Psychologica, 144, 1, 190--206.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Patla, A. 2004. Gaze behaviors during adaptive human locomotion: insights into how vision is used to regulate locomotion. Chapter 17 in Optic Flow and Beyond, Vaina, L. M., Beardsley, S. A., Rushton, S. K., eds., Springer, 383--399. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Pelz, J., Purington, J. Herbert, A. 2009. Travel gaze? Re-examining gaze behavior during locomotion. Journal of Vision, 9, 8, 422.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Razzaque, S., Kohn, Z., Whitton, M. C. 2001 Redirected Walking. Eurographics (short paper presentation).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Ruhland, K., Andrist, S., Badler, J., Peters, C., Badler, N., Gleicher, M., Mutlu, B., McDonnell, R. 2014. Look me in the eyes: a survey of eye and gaze animation for virtual agents and artificial systems. Eurographics State of the Art Report, 69--91.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Shimojo, S., Simion, C., Shimijo, E., Scheier, C. 2003. Gaze bias both reflects and influences preference. Nature Neurosci., 6, 12, 1317--1322.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Tatler, B., Hayhoe, M. M., Land, M. F., Ballard D. H. 2011. Eye guidance in natural vision: reinterpreting salience. Journal of Vision, 11, 5, 5, 1--23.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Wilkie, R. M., Kountouriotis, G. K., Merat, N., Wann, J. P. 2010. Using vision to control locomotion: looking where you want to go. Experimental Brain Research, 204, 4, 539--547.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Williams, B., Narasimham, G., Rump, B., McNamara, T. P., Carr, T. H., Rieser, J. J., Bodenheimer, B. 2007. Exploring large virtual environments with an HMD when physical space is limited. ACM/SIGGRAPH Symposium on Applied Perception in Graphics and Visualization, 41--48. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Zank, M. and Kunz A. 2015. Using locomotion models for estimating walking targets in immersive virtual environments. International Conference on Cyberworlds, 229--236. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Zank, M. and Kunz A. 2016. Eye tracking for locomotion prediction in redirected walking. IEEE Symposium on 3D User Interfaces, 49--58.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Zmuda, M. A., Wonser, J. L., Bachmann, E. R., Hodgson, E. 2013. Optimizing constrained-environment redirected walking instructions using search techniques. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 19, 11, 1872--1884. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Predicting destination using head orientation and gaze direction during locomotion in VR

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        SAP '16: Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Applied Perception
        July 2016
        149 pages
        ISBN:9781450343831
        DOI:10.1145/2931002

        Copyright © 2016 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 22 July 2016

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate43of94submissions,46%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader