research-article

Purposeful performance variability in software product lines: a comparison of two case studies

Authors:

Varvana Myllärniemi,

Mikko Raatikainen,

Juha Savolainen,

Tomi MännistöAuthors Info & Claims

SPLC '16: Proceedings of the 20th International Systems and Software Product Line Conference

Pages 144 - 153

https://doi.org/10.1145/2934466.2934474

Published: 16 September 2016 Publication History

Abstract

Within software product lines, customers may have different quality needs. To produce products with purposefully different quality attributes, several challenges must be addressed. First, one must be able to distinguish product quality attributes to the customers in a meaningful way. Second, one must create the desired quality attribute differences during product-line architecture design and derivation. To study how performance is varied purposefully in software product lines, we conducted a comparison and re-analysis of two industrial case studies in the telecommunication and mobile game domains. The results show that performance variants must be communicated to the customer in a way that links to customer value and her role. When performance or its adaptation are crucial for the customer, performance differences must be explicitly "designed in" with software or hardware means. Due to the emergent nature of performance, it is important to test performance and manage how other variability affects performance.

References

[1]

L. Bass, P. Clements, and R. Kazman. Software Architecture in Practice. Addison-Wesley, 2003.

Digital Library

[2]

D. Benavides, P. T. Martín-Arroyo, and A. R. Cortés. Automated reasoning on feature models. In CAiSE, 2005.

Digital Library

[3]

R. Berntsson Svensson, T. Gorschek, B. Regnell, R. Torkar, A. Shahrokni, and R. Feldt. Quality requirements in industrial practice -- an extended interview study at eleven companies. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng., 38(4):923--935, 2012.

Digital Library

[4]

P. Clements and L. Northrop. Software Product Lines---Practices and Patterns. Addison-Wesley, 2001.

Digital Library

[5]

L. Etxeberria and G. Sagardui. Variability driven quality evaluation in software product lines. In SPLC, 2008.

Digital Library

[6]

B. Gonzales-Baixauli, J. Prado Leite, and J. Mylopoulos. Visual variability analysis for goal models. In RE, 2004.

Digital Library

[7]

S. Gregor. The nature of theory in information systems. MIS Q., 30(3):611--642, 2006.

[8]

J. Guo, J. White, G. Wang, J. Li, and Y. Wang. A genetic algorithm for optimized feature selection with resource constraints in software product lines. J Syst. Softw., 84(12), 2011.

Digital Library

[9]

S. Hallsteinsen, T. E. Fægri, and M. Syrstad. Patterns in product family architecture design. In PFE, 2003.

[10]

S. Hallsteinsen, G. Schouten, G. Boot, and T. Fægri. Dealing with architectural variation in product populations. In T. Käkölä and J. C. Dueñas, editors, Software Product Lines -- Research Issues in Engineering and Management. Springer, 2006.

[11]

G. Halmans and K. Pohl. Communicating the variability of a software-product family to customers. Softw. Syst. Modeling, 2(1), 2003.

[12]

H. Holma and A. Toskala, editors. WCDMA for UMTS: radio access for third generation mobile communications. Wiley, 2000.

Digital Library

[13]

A. Huberman and M. Miles. The Qualitative Data Analysis. Sage Publications, 2 edition, 1994.

[14]

Y. Ishida. Software product lines approach in enterprise system development. In SPLC, 2007.

Digital Library

[15]

ISO/IEC 25010. Software engineering---product quality---part 1: Quality model, 2011.

[16]

ISO/IEC 9126-1. Systems and software engineering---systems and software quality requirements and evaluation (SQuaRE)---system and software quality models, 2001.

[17]

S. Jarzabek, B. Yang, and S. Yoeun. Addressing quality attributes in domain analysis for product lines. IEE Proc.-Softw., 153(2), 2006.

[18]

K. Kang, S. Cohen, J. Hess, W. Novak, and A. Peterson. Feature-oriented domain analysis (FODA) feasibility study. Technical Report CMU/SEI-90-TR-21, SEI, 1990.

[19]

K. Kang, S. Kim, J. Lee, K. Kim, E. Shin, and M. Huh. Form: A feature-oriented reuse method with domain-specific reference architectures. Annals Softw. Engg., 5(1):143--168, 1998.

Digital Library

[20]

K. Kang, J. Lee, and P. Donohoe. Feature-oriented product line engineering. IEEE Softw., 19(4):58--65, 2002.

Digital Library

[21]

T. Kishi and N. Noda. Aspect-oriented analysis of product line architecture. In SPLC, 2000.

Digital Library

[22]

T. Kishi, N. Noda, and T. Katayama. A method for product line scoping based on a decision-making framework. In SPLC, 2002.

Digital Library

[23]

J. Kuusela and J. Savolainen. Requirements engineering for product families. In ICSE, 2000.

Digital Library

[24]

M. A. Laguna and B. González-Baixauli. Product line requirements: Multi-paradigm variability models. In Workshop on RE, 2008.

[25]

J. Lee, K. Kang, P. Sawyer, and H. Lee. A holistic approach to feature modeling for product line requirements engineering. Requirements Engg. J., 19(4):377--395, 2014.

Digital Library

[26]

K. Lee and K. C. Kang. Using context as key driver for feature selection. In SPLC, 2010.

Digital Library

[27]

M. Matinlassi. Quality-driven software architecture model transformation. In WICSA, 2005.

Digital Library

[28]

D. Mellado, E. Fernández-Medina, and M. Piattini. Security requirements engineering framework for software product lines. Information Softw. Techn., 52(10):1094 -- 1117, 2010.

Digital Library

[29]

V. Myllärniemi, M. Raatikainen, and T. Männistö. Inter-organisational approach in rapid software product family development---a case study. In ICSR, 2006.

Digital Library

[30]

V. Myllärniemi, J. Savolainen, and T. Männistö. Performance variability in software product lines: A case study in the telecommunication domain. In SPLC, 2013.

Digital Library

[31]

V. Myllärniemi, J. Savolainen, M. Raatikainen, and T. Männistö. Performance variability in software product lines: proposing theories from a case study. Empirical Softw. Engg., Online Feb 2015.

[32]

E. Niemelä and A. Immonen. Capturing quality requirements of product family architecture. Information Softw. Techn., 49(11-12), 2007.

Digital Library

[33]

M. Q. Patton. Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods. Sage Publications, 2nd edition, 1990.

[34]

C. Quinton, R. Rouvoy, and L. Ducein. Leveraging feature models to configure virtual appliances. In CloudCP, 2012.

Digital Library

[35]

P. Runeson and M. Höst. Guidelines for conducting and reporting case study research in software engineering. Empirical Softw. Engg., 14(2):131--164, 2009.

Digital Library

[36]

N. Siegmund, S. Kolesnikov, C. Kastner, S. Apel, D. Batory, M. Rosenmüller, and G. Saake. Predicting performance via automated feature-interaction detection. In ICSE, 2012.

Digital Library

[37]

N. Siegmund, M. Rosenmüller, C. Kastner, P. G. Giarrusso, S. Apel, and S. S. Kolesnikov. Scalable prediction of non-functional properties in software product lines: Footprint and memory consumption. Information Softw. Techn., 55(3):491 -- 507, 2013.

Digital Library

[38]

N. Siegmund, M. Rosenmüller, M. Kuhlemann, C. Kastner, S. Apel, and G. Saake. SPL Conqueror: Toward optimization of non-functional properties in software. Softw. Quality J, 20(3-4), 2012.

Digital Library

[39]

J. Sincero, W. Schroder-Preikschat, and O. Spinczyk. Approaching non-functional properties of software product lines: Learning from products. In APSEC, 2010.

Digital Library

[40]

M. Sinnema, S. Deelstra, J. Nijhuis, and J. Bosch. Modeling dependencies in product families with COVAMOF. In ECBS, 2006.

Digital Library

[41]

S. Soltani, M. Asadi, D. Gasevic, M. Hatala, and E. Bagheri. Automated planning for feature model configuration based on functional and non-functional requirements. In SPLC, 2012.

Digital Library

[42]

S. S. Stevens. On the theory of scales of measurement. Science, 103(2684):677--680, 1946.

[43]

A. Strauss and J. Corbin. Basics of Qualitative Research. Sage, 2 edition, 1998.

[44]

M. Svahnberg, J. van Gurp, and J. Bosch. A taxononomy of variability realization techniques. Softw. Pract. Exper., 35(8):705--754, 2005.

Digital Library

[45]

C. Urquhart, H. Lehmann, and M. D. Myers. Putting the theory back into grounded theory: guidelines for grounded theory studies in information systems. Inf. Syst. J, 20(4):357--381, 2010.

[46]

J. White, B. Dougherty, and D. C. Schmidt. Selecting highly optimal architectural feature sets with filtered cartesian flattening. J Syst. Softw., 82(8), 2009.

Digital Library

[47]

R. K. Yin. Case Study Research. Sage: Thousand Oaks, 2nd edition, 1994.

[48]

Y. Yu, J. C. S. do Prado Leite, A. Lapouchnian, and J. Mylopoulos. Configuring features with stakeholder goals. In SAC, 2008.

Digital Library

Cited By

Teppola SParviainen PPartanen JKettunen P(2016)Variability Management Strategies to Support Efficient Delivery and Maintenance of Embedded SystemsProduct-Focused Software Process Improvement10.1007/978-3-319-26844-6_31(431-438)Online publication date: 5-Jan-2016
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26844-6_31

Index Terms

Purposeful performance variability in software product lines: a comparison of two case studies
1. Software and its engineering
  1. Software creation and management
    1. Software development techniques
      1. Reusability
        Software product lines

Recommendations

Performance variability in software product lines: proposing theories from a case study

In the software product line research, product variants typically differ by their functionality and quality attributes are not purposefully varied. The goal is to study purposeful performance variability in software product lines, in particular, the ...
Performance variability in software product lines: a case study in the telecommunication domain
SPLC '13: Proceedings of the 17th International Software Product Line Conference

In the research on software product lines, product variants typically differ by their functionality, and quality attributes are more or less similar across products. To accumulate empirical evidence, this paper presents a descriptive case study of ...
Optimization of Variability in Software Product Lines
SPLC '07: Proceedings of the 11th International Software Product Line Conference

The widespread use of the product line approach allows companies to realize significant improvements in time-tomarket, cost, productivity, and quality. However, a fundamental problem in software product line engineering is that a product line of ...

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences

SPLC '16: Proceedings of the 20th International Systems and Software Product Line Conference

September 2016

367 pages

ISBN:9781450340502

DOI:10.1145/2934466

General Chair:
Hong Mei
Shanghai Jiao Tong University, China

Copyright © 2016 ACM.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Sponsors

Huawei Technologies Co. Ltd.: Huawei Technologies Co. Ltd.
Key Laboratory of High Confidence Software Technologies: Key Laboratory of High Confidence Software Technologies, Ministry of Education
DC Holdings: Digital China Holdings Limited

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 16 September 2016

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Qualifiers

Research-article

Conference

SPLC '16

Sponsor:

Huawei Technologies Co. Ltd.
Key Laboratory of High Confidence Software Technologies
DC Holdings

SPLC '16: The 20th International Systems and Software Product Line Conference

September 16 - 23, 2016

Beijing, China

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 167 of 463 submissions, 36%

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

1
Total Citations
View Citations
104
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)3
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

Reflects downloads up to 05 Mar 2025

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Teppola SParviainen PPartanen JKettunen P(2016)Variability Management Strategies to Support Efficient Delivery and Maintenance of Embedded SystemsProduct-Focused Software Process Improvement10.1007/978-3-319-26844-6_31(431-438)Online publication date: 5-Jan-2016
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26844-6_31

View Options

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

Figures

Tables

Media

View Table of Conten