skip to main content
10.1145/2940299.2940304acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagespdcConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Counterfactual scripting: acknowledging the past as a resource for PD

Published:15 August 2016Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper discusses counterfactual scripting as a framework to critically inquire and give form to design decisions in Participatory Design (PD) processes. The stories of what has happened in a design process are often told in a clear storyline that develops logically via different design moves towards a well-defined plot. Counterfactual scripting is a rejection of this teleological perspective. Inspired by counterfactual history, counterfactual scripting gives form to the PD process via the creation of plausible alternatives for the past and speculations about the future. In this way, the (materialised) counterfactual script facilitates in the perception of a more pluralistic view of past and future. In this paper we form the basis for a framework of counterfactual scripting by connecting theory on decision-making in PD with theory on counterfactual thinking in history and design. This framework is applied and evaluated in a case study in participatory spatial planning.

References

  1. Akrich, M. 1992. The de-scription of technical objects. Shaping technology/building society: 205--224.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Andersen, L., Danholt, P., Halskov, K. Brodersen Hansen, N. and Lauritsen, P. 2015. Participation as a matter of concern in participatory design. CoDesign 11, 3-4: 250--261. DOI=http://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2015.1081246Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Arnstein, S. 1969. A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of planners 35, 4: 216--224.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Binder, T. 1999. Setting the Stage for Improvised Video Scenarios. CHI '99 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, 230--231. DOI=http://doi.org/10.1145/632716.632859 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Binder, T., Brandt, E., Ehn, P. and Halse, J. 2015. Democratic design experiments: between parliament and laboratory. CoDesign 11, 3-4: 152--165. DOI=http://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2015.1081248Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Bleecker, J. 2009. Design Fiction: A Short Essay on Design, Science, Fact and Fiction -- Near Future Laboratory. Retrieved January 6, 2016 from http://blog.nearfuturelaboratory.com/2009/03/17/design-fiction-a-short-essay-on-design-science-fact-and-fiction/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Brandt, E. and Grunnet, C. 2000. Evoking the future: Drama and props in user centered design. Proc. of PDC 2000. 11--20.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Bratteteig, T. and Wagner, I. 2012. Disentangling power and decision-making in participatory design. Proceedings of the 12th Participatory Design Conference. ACM, 41--50. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Bratteteig, T. and Wagner, I. 2014. Disentangling Participation. Springer International Publishing, Cham. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. De Bie, M., Oosterlinck, S. and De Blust, S. 2012. Participatie, ontwerp en toe-eigening in een democratische stadsvernieuwing. In Stadsvernieuwingsprojecten in Vlaanderen (2002-2011): een eigenzinnige praktijk in Europees perspectief. ASP nv, 29--33.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. De Bleeckere, S. and De Ridder, R. 2014. Het open kerkgebouw. Pelckmans.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. DiSalvo, C. 2009. Design and the Construction of Publics. Design issues 25, 1: 48--63. DOI=http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/desi.2009.25.1.48Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. DiSalvo, C., Clement, A. and Pipek, V. 2012. Participatory Design For, With, and By Communities. In International Handbook of Participatory Desig. Routledge, Oxford, 182--209. DOI=http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203108543.ch8Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Ehn, P. 1988. Work-oriented design of computer artifacts. Hillsdale, NJ, USA: L. Erlbaum Associates Inc. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Ehn, P. and Sjögren, D. 1992. From system descriptions to scripts for action. In Design at Work. Greenbaum, J. and Kyng, M. (eds.). L. Erlbaum Associates Inc., Hillsdale, NJ, 241--268. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Ertner, M., Kragelund, A. and Malmborg, L. 2010. Five Enunciations of Empowerment in Participatory Design. Proc. of the 11th Biennial Participatory Design Conference, ACM, 191--194. DOI=http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1900441.1900475 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Ferguson, N. 2000. Virtual History: Alternatives and Counterfactuals. Basic Books.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Geertz, C. 1994. Thick description: Toward an interpretive theory of culture. Readings in the philosophy of social science: 213--231.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Ginderachter, M., Aerts, K. and Vrints, A. 2015. Het land dat nooit was: een tegenfeitelijke geschiedenis van België. Bezige Bij.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Godfrey-Smith, P. 2009. Causal Pluralism. In The Oxford Handbook of Causation, Helen Beebee, Peter Menzies and Christopher Hitchcock (eds.). Oxford University Press, 326--337.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Goffman, G. 1974. Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Gonzatto, R., Amstel, F., Merkle, L. and Hartmann, T. 2013. The ideology of the future in design fictions. Digital Creativity 24, 1: 36--45.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Hales, D. 2013. Design fictions an introduction and provisional taxonomy. Digital Creativity 24, 1: 1--10. DOI=http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14626268.2013.769453Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Hitchcock, C. 2007. How to be a Causal Pluralist. In Thinking About Causes: From Greek Philosophy to Modern Physics, Machamer, P. and Wolters, G. (eds.). Un. of Pittsburgh Press, 200--221.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Huybrechts, L. and Jansen, S. 2009. Carefree living in the elderly care. A description of an experience design research process. Royal C. of Art, Helen Hamlyn Research Centre, 1--6.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Latour, B. and Weibel, P. 2005. Making Things Public: Atmospheres of Democracy. The MIT Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Lebow. R. 2007. Counterfactual Thought Experiments: A Necessary Teaching Tool. The History Teacher 40, 2: 153--176.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Lewis, D. 1973. Counterfactuals. Blackwell Publishers.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Lincoln, Y. and Guba, E. 1985. Naturalistic inquiry. Sage.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Lukens, J. and DiSalvo, C. 2011. Speculative Design and Technological Fluency. Int. Journal of Learning and Media 3, 4: 23--40. DOI=http://doi.org/10.1162/IJLM_a_00080Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Sanders, E. and Stappers, P. 2008. Co-creation and the new landscapes of design. CoDesign 4, 1: 5--18. DOI=http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15710880701875068Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Telier, A., Binder, T., De Michelis, G., Ehn, P., Jacucci, G. and Wagner, I. 2011. Design things. MIT Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Wakkary, R., Odom, W., Hauser, S., Hertz, G. and Lin, H. 2015. Material Speculation: Actual Artifacts for Critical Inquiry. Aarhus Series on Human Centered Computing 1, 1: 12. DOI=http://dx.doi.org/10.7146/aahcc.v1i1.21299Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Ytreberg, E. 2002. Erving Goffman as a theorist of the mass media. Critical Studies in Media Communication 19, 4: 481--497. DOI=http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07393180216570Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Counterfactual scripting: acknowledging the past as a resource for PD

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      PDC '16: Proceedings of the 14th Participatory Design Conference: Full papers - Volume 1
      August 2016
      192 pages
      ISBN:9781450340465
      DOI:10.1145/2940299

      Copyright © 2016 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 15 August 2016

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate49of289submissions,17%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader