skip to main content
10.1145/2940299.2940309acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagespdcConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Playing with personalisation and openness in a codesign project involving people with dementia

Published:15 August 2016Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper describes and discusses the configuration of participation, and the first results of a participatory design research project, which explores how design can enable people with dementia and their social circle to codesign personalised strategies to communicate, focusing on leisure and entertainment as means to build and maintain social relationships. Personalisation is seen as an invitation to participate in the design project, where several aspects are left open to be redefined, organised and controlled by participants according to their needs, preferences and availabilities.

References

  1. Allan, K. 2001. Communication and Consultation. The Policy Press, Bristol.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Allan, K. and Killick, J. 2008. Communication and relationships: an inclusive social world. In Excellence in Dementia Care: Research into Practice. M. Downs and B. Bowers, eds. McGraw-Hill International, Berkshire, 212--229.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Bailey, G. and Sanderson, H. 2013. Personalisation and Dementia. Jessica Kingsley Publishers, London.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Binder, T. 2010. Beyond Methods. Rehearsing the future. J. Halse, E. Brandt, B. Clark, and T. Binder, eds. The Danish Design School, Copenhagen, 18--21.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Branco, R. M. 2014. How can communication design add value in the context of Alzheimer's disease? In Proceedings of the 2nd European Conference on Design 4 Health (Sheffield, July 3-5, 2013), 42--53.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Branco, R. M., Quental, J. and Ribeiro, Ó. 2015. Getting Closer, Empathising and Understanding: Setting the Stage for a Codesign Project with People with Dementia. IxD&A. 26, (Autumn 2015), 114--131.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Branco, R. M., Quental, J. and Ribeiro, Ó. 2015. "I'm always well when we are together": Observation of institutional activities with people with dementia and its implications for a co-design research project. In Proceedings of the 3rd European Conference on Design 4 Health (Sheffield, July 13-16, 2015).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Brandt, E. 2011. Participation through Exploratory Design Games. Facilitating Change. Rasmmussen, L. B., ed. Polyteknisk Forlag, 213--256.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Brandt, E., Binder, T. and Sanders, E. B. N. 2013. Tools and Techniques: Ways to engage telling, making and enacting. In Routledge International Handbook of Participatory Design. T. Robertson and J. Simonsen, eds. Routledge, London, 145--181.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Brandt, E., Redström, J., Eriksen, M. A. and Binder, T. 2011. XLAB. The Danish Design School Press, Copenhagen.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Brooker, D. 2007. Person-centred Dementia Care: Making Services Better. Jessica Kingsley Publishers, London.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Cowdell, F. 2006. Preserving personhood in dementia research: a literature review. International Journal of Older People Nursing. 1, 2 (Jun. 2006), 85--94. DOI=http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-3743.2006.00016.xGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Dix, A. 2007. Designing for appropriation. In Proceedings of the 21st BCS HCI Group Conference (Lancaster, Sep. 2007), 79--95. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Eco, U. 1989. The Open Work. Harvard University.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Ehn, P. 2008. Participation in design things. In Proceedings of the Tenth Anniversary Conference on Participatory Design (Bloomington, Indiana, USA, October 1-4, 2008). ACM, New York, NY, 92--101. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Fan, H. and Poole, M. S. 2006. What Is Personalization? Perspectives on the Design and Implementation of Personalization in Information Systems. Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce. 16, 3-4, 179--202. DOI=http://doi.org/10.1080/10919392.2006.9681199Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Hendriks, N., Huybrechts, L., Wilkinson, A. and Slegers, K. 2014. Challenges in doing participatory design with people with dementia. In Proceedings of the 13th Participatory Design Conference (Windhoek, October 06-10, 2014). ACM, New York, NY, 33--36. DOI=http://doi.org/10.1145/2662155.2662196 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Hendriks, N., Slegers, K. and Duysburgh, P. 2015. Codesign with people living with cognitive or sensory impairments: a case for method stories and uniqueness. CoDesign. 11, 1 (Mar. 2015), 70--82. DOI=http://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2015.1020316Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Iversen, O. S., Halskov, K. and Leong, T. W. 2012. Values-led participatory design. CoDesign. 8, 2-3 (May 2012), 87--103. DOI=http://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2012.672575Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Jonas, W. 2007. Design Research and its Meaning to the Methodological Development of the Discipline. Design Research Now. R. Michel, ed. Birkhäuser Basel. 187--206. DOI=http://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7643-8472-2_11Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Kitwood, T. 1997. Dementia Reconsidered. Open University Press, Berkshire.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Kuksa, I. and Fisher, T. Design and Personalisation. By a Person or for a Person? In Proceedings of CENTRIC 2014: The Seventh International Conference on Advances in Human-oriented and Personalized Mechanisms, Technologies, and Services (Nice, France, October 12-16, 2014). 44--47.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Lindsay, S., Brittain, K., Jackson, D., Ladha, C., Ladha, K. and Olivier, P. 2012. Empathy, participatory design and people with dementia. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Austin, Texas, May 5-10). ACM, New York, NY, 521--530. DOI=http://doi.org/10.1145/2207676.2207749 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. McCarthy, J. and Wright, P. C. 2015. Taking {A}part. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Merriam-Webster. 2016. Retrieved from http://www.merriam-webster.comGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Orpwood, R. 2009. Involving People with Dementia in the Design Process -- Examples of Iterative Design. Dementia, Design and Technology. P. Topo and B. Östlund, eds. IOS Press, Amsterdam, 79--95. DOI=http://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-58603-950-9-79Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Redström, J. 2008. RE:Definitions of use. Design studies. 29, 4 (Jul. 2008), 410--423. DOI=http://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2008.05.001Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Vines, J., Clarke, R., Wright, P. C., McCarthy, J. and Olivier, P. 2013. Configuring participation: on how we involve people in design. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Paris, April 27-May 2 2013) ACM, New York, NY, 429--438. DOI=http://doi.org/10.1145/2470654.2470716 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Wallace, J., Wright, P. C., McCarthy, J., Green, D. P., Thomas, J. and Olivier, P. 2013. A design-led inquiry into personhood in dementia. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Paris, April 27-May 2 2013). ACM, New York, NY, 2617--2626. DOI=http://doi.org/10.1145/2470654.2481363 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Wright, P. C. and McCarthy, J. 2005. The value of the novel in designing for experience. In Future Interaction Design, Pirhonen, A., Saariluoma, P., Isomäki, P. and Roast, C. (eds.). Springer, London, 9--30. DOI=http://doi.org/10.1007/1-84628-089-3_2Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Zarit, S. H. and Zarit, J. M. 2008. Flexibility and change: the fundamentals for families coping with dementia. In Excellence in Dementia Care: Research into Practice. M. Downs and B. Bowers, eds. McGraw-Hill International, Berkshire, 85--102.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Zeisel, J. 2009. I'm Still Here. Avery, New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Playing with personalisation and openness in a codesign project involving people with dementia

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        PDC '16: Proceedings of the 14th Participatory Design Conference: Full papers - Volume 1
        August 2016
        192 pages
        ISBN:9781450340465
        DOI:10.1145/2940299

        Copyright © 2016 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 15 August 2016

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate49of289submissions,17%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader