skip to main content
10.1145/2940299.2940317acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagespdcConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

"...it's your project, but it's not necessarily your work...": infrastructuring, situatedness, and designing relational practice

Published:15 August 2016Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper builds on trajectories in PD that attend to designers' situatedness within the broader systemic contexts in which they work. It proposes (re)considering infrastructuring, understood as a range of approaches to designing socio-material systems, through attention to designers' locations, as one way to imagine what is at stake when designing with people. The paper draws upon a reflective analysis of long-term design research with a social justice organization. The local context of the group and the larger socio-political-historical context of systems of policing with which the group contends shaped our understandings of what was necessary, possible and strategic. Working at the intersections of these infrastructures, in turn, shaped how we designed together. I propose "relational practice" as a framework for critically engaging designers' dynamic positions in infrastructuring and argue that how we design relational practices, and how we understand them, is critical for how we approach infrastructuring as on-going work toward shared, if complex and difficult to imagine, social and political possibilities.

References

  1. Agid, S. 2011. 'How can we design something to transition people from a system that doesn't want to let them go?': Social Design and its Political Contexts. Design Philosophy Papers, "Beyond 'Progressive Design," 3.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Akama, Y. 2015. Being awake to Ma: Designing in between-ness as a way of becoming with. CoDesign (11) (3-4), 262--274. DOI:10.1080/15710882.2015.1081243Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Akama, Y., Stuedahl, D., and van Zyl. 2015. Design Disruptions in Contested, Contingent and Contradictory Future-making. Interaction Design and Architecture(s) Journal - IxD&A (26), 132--148.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Bannon, L. J. and Ehn, P. 2012. Design: design matters in participatory design. In Routledge Handbook of Participatory Design, edited by Jesper Simonsen and Toni Robertson, 37--63. New York: Routledge.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Beck, Eevi E. 2002. P for Political: Participation is Not Enough. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems. (14) (1), 77--92.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Björgvinsson, E., Ehn, P. and Hillgren. P. A. 2012. Agonistic participatory design: working with marginalized social movements. CoDesign (8) (2-3), 127--144. DOI:10.1080/15710882.2012.672577Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Bødker, S. and Grønbæk, K. 1991. Design in action: From prototyping by demonstration to cooperative prototyping. In Design at Work: Cooperative Design of Computer Systems, edited by J. Greenbaum and M. Kyng, 197--218. Hillsdale, NJ: L. Erlbaum Associates Inc. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Bohrman, R. and Murakawa, N. 2005. Remaking big government: Immigration and crime control in the United States. In Global Lockdown: Race, Gender, and the Prison Industrial Complex, edited by Julia Sudbury, 109--126. New York: Routledge.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Bonsiepe, G. 2006. Design and Democracy. Design Issues (22) (2), 27--34.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Bowker, G. C. and Star, S. L. 1999. Sorting things out: Classification and its consequences. Cambridge: MIT Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Brandt, E., Binder, T. and Sanders, E. B.-N. 2012. Tools and Techniques: Ways to engage telling, making and enacting," In Routledge Handbook of Participatory Design, edited by J. Simonsen and T. Robertson, 145--181. New York: Routledge.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Carson, E. A. 2015. Prisoners in 2014. U.S. Bureau of Justice Statistics. http://www.bjs.gov/index.cfm?ty=pbdetail&iid=5387Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Clement, A, McPhail, B., Smith, M. L. and Ferenbok, J. 2012. Probing, Mocking, and Prototyping: Participatory approaches to identity infrastructuring. PDC '12, 21--30. DOI: 10.1145/2347635.2347639 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Critical Resistance Abolition Toolkit Workgroup. 2004. The CR Abolition Organizing Toolkit. http://criticalresistance.org/resources/the-abolitionist-toolkit/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Davis, A. Y. 2003. Are Prisons Obsolete? New York: Seven Stories Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Davis, A. Y. 2005. Abolition Democracy: Beyond Empire, Prisons, and Torture. New York: Seven Stories Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Dearden, A., Light, A., Zamenopoulos, T., Graham, P., Plouviez, E., and de Sousa, S. 2014. Scaling Up Co-Design: Research Projects and Design Things. PDC '14, 1--4. DOI: 10.1145/2662155.2662182 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. DiSalvo, C., Clement, A. and Pipek, V. 2012. Communities: Participatory Design for, with and by communities. In Routledge International Handbook of Participatory Design. edited by J. Simonsen and T. Robertson, 182--209. Routledge: New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Doane, G. H. 2002. Beyond behavioral skills to human-involved processes: Relational Practice and Interpretive Pedagogy. Journal of Nursing Education (41) (9), 400--404.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Doane, G. H. 2014. Guest Editorial: Beyond Relational Oblivion. Advances in Nursing Science (37) (2), 84--86. DOI: 10.1097/ANS.0000000000000021Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Ehn, P. 2008. Participation in Design Things. PDC '08, 92--101. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Eriksen, M. A. 2012. Material Matter in Co-Designing: Formatting & Staging with Participating Materials in Co-Design Projects, Events & Situations. Ph.D. dissertation, Malmö University, School of Arts and Communication -- K3.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Fletcher, J. K. 1998. Relational Practice: A Feminist Reconstruction of Work. Journal of Management Inquiry (7) (2), 163--186.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Fletcher, J. K. 1999. Disappearing Acts: Gender, Power, and Relational Practice at Work. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Gilmore, R. W. 2007. Golden Gulag: Prisons, Surplus, Crisis and Opposition in Globalizing California. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Gilroy, P. 2011. Paul Gilroy speaks on the riots, August 2011, Tottenham, North London. transcript posted on "The Dream of Safety" blog, Aug. http://dreamofsafety.blogspot.com/2011/08/paul-gilroy-speaks-on-riots-august-2011.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Haraway, D. J. 1991. Simians, Cyborgs, and Women: The Reinvention of Nature. New York: Routledge.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Hillgren, P-A., Seravalli, A., and Emilson, A. 2011. Prototyping and infrastructuring in design for social innovation. CoDesign (7)(3-4), 169--183. DOI:10.1080/15710882.2011.630474Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Kandaswamy, P. 2008. State Austerity and the Racial Politics of Same-Sex Marriage in the US. Sexualities 11 (6), 706--725. DOI: 10.1177/1363460708096914Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Karasti, H. 2014. Infrastructuring in Participatory Design. PDC '14, 141--150. DOI: 10.1145/2661435.2661450 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Karasti, H. and Baker, K. S. 2004. Infrastructuring for the Long-Term: Ecological Information Management. 37th Hawaii International Conf. on System Sciences, 1--10.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Karasti, H., Baker, K. S., and Millerand, F. 2010. Infrastructure Time: Long-Term Matters in Collaborative Development. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (19) (3-4), 377--415. DOI: 10.1007/s10606-010-9113-z Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Karasti, H. and Syrjänen, A.-L. 2004. Artful infrastructuring in two cases of community PD. PDC '04, 20--30. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Kwon, M. 2002. One Place After Another: Site-Specific Art and Locational Identity. Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Le Dantec, C. A. and DiSalvo, C. 2013. Infrastructuring and the formation of publics in participatory design. Social Studies of Science (43)(2), 241--264. DOI: 10.1177/0306312712471581Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Lee, Y. 2008. Design participation tactics: the challenges and new roles of designers in the co-design process. CoDesign (4) (1), 31--50. DOI:10.1080/15710880701875613Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Light, A. 2010. HCI as Heterodoxy: The Queering of Interaction Design. CHI '10, 1--8.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Light, A and Akama, Y. 2012. The human touch: From method to participatory practice in facilitating design with communities. PDC '12, 1--10. DOI: 10.1145/2347635.2347645Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Light, A and Akama, Y. 2014. Structuring Future Social Relations: The Politics of Care in Participatory Practice. PDC '14, 151--160. DOI: 10.1145/2661435.2661438 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Monmaney, T. 2000. Rampart-Like Scandal Rocks Oakland Justice System, Politics. Los Angeles Times, December 11. http://articles.latimes.com/print/2000/dec/11/news/mn-64091Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Moughty, S. 2011. The Oakland Police Department's Troubled History. PBS: Frontline, October 27. http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/frontline/article/the-oakland-police-departments-troubled-history/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Neumann, L. J. and Star, S. L. 1996. Making Infrastructure: The Dream of a Common Language. PDC '96, 231--240.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. Pipek, V. and Wulf, V. 2009. Infrastructuring: Toward an Integrated Perspective on the Design and Use of Information Technology. JAIS (10), 447--473.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. Rios, V. M. 2011. Punished: Policing the Lives of Black and Latino Boys. New York: NYU Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. Robertson, T and Simonsen, J. 2012. Participatory Design: an Introduction. in Routledge Handbook of Participatory Design, edited by J. Simonsen and T. Robertson, 1--18. Hoboken: Taylor and Francis.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. Schmitt, J., Warner, K., and Gupta, S. 2010. The High Budgetary Cost of Incarceration. Washington, D.C.: Center for Economic and Policy Research.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. Seigel, M. Forthcoming. Nelson Rockefeller in Latin America: Global Currents of U.S. Prison Growth. Comparative American StudiesGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  48. Star, S. L. and Ruhleder, K. 1996. Steps toward an Ecology of Infrastructure: Borderlands of Design and Access for Large Information Spaces. Information Systems Research (7) (1), 111--134. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  49. Suchman, L. 2002. Located Accountabilities in Technology Production. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems 14 (2), 91--105. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. "...it's your project, but it's not necessarily your work...": infrastructuring, situatedness, and designing relational practice

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        PDC '16: Proceedings of the 14th Participatory Design Conference: Full papers - Volume 1
        August 2016
        192 pages
        ISBN:9781450340465
        DOI:10.1145/2940299

        Copyright © 2016 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 15 August 2016

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate49of289submissions,17%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader