skip to main content
10.1145/2948910.2948922acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmocoConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Sarka: Sonification and Somaesthetic Appreciation Design

Published:05 July 2016Publication History

ABSTRACT

We often take for granted that we have immediate access to our perception and experience of and through our bodies. But inward listening is a demanding activity and thus not easy to learn to perform or design for. With the Sarka mat we want to support the ability to direct attention by providing sound feedback linked to the weight distribution and motion intensity of different parts of the body, and to provide an exemplar for how such design may be conducted. The process of Sarka's creation is informed by Somaesthetic Appreciation Design. We discuss how a sonic feedback signal can influence listeners, followed by how we, in this design, worked to navigate the complex design space presented to us. We detail the design process involved, and the very particular set of limitations which this interactive sonification presented.

References

  1. Ilias Bergstrom. 2016. Digital craft tools for user innovation without end-user programming -- the Puppeteering concept. (Under Review).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Ilias Bergstrom and R. Beau Lotto. 2014. Soma: Live musical performance where congruent visual, auditory, and proprioceptive stimuli fuse to form a combined aesthetic narrative. Leonardo.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Ilias Bergstrom, Sofia Seinfeld, Jorge Arroyo-Palacios, Mel Slater, and Maria V. Sanchez-Vives. 2014. Using music as a signal for biofeedback. International Journal of Psychophysiology 93, 1: 140--149.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Ilias Bergstrom, Anthony Steed, and Beau Lotto. 2009. Mutable Mapping: gradual re-routing of OSC control data as a form of artistic performance. Proceedings of the international conference on Advances in computer entertainment technology, 290--293. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. L. Chiari, M. Dozza, A. Cappello, F. B Horak, V. Macellari, and D. Giansanti. 2005. Audio-biofeedback for balance improvement: an accelerometry-based system. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering 52, 12: 2108--2111.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Martin Clayton, Rebecca Sager, and Udo Will. 2005. In time with the music: the concept of entrainment and its significance for ethnomusicology.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Antonio R. Damasio. 2006. Descartes' error. Random House.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Ludvig Elblaus, Maurizio Goina, Marie-Andrée Robitaille, and Roberto Bresin. 2014. Modes of sonic interaction in circus: Three proofs of concept. Proceedings of the Sound and Music Computing Conference, 1698--1706.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Moshe Feldenkrais. 1972. Awareness through movement. Feldenkrais Resources.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Frank Feltham, Lian Loke, Elise van den Hoven, Jeffrey Hannam, and Bert Bongers. 2013. The Slow Floor: Increasing Creative Agency While Walking on an Interactive Surface. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Tangible, Embedded and Embodied Interaction, ACM, 105--112. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. William Gaver. 2012. What should we expect from research through design? Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, ACM, 937--946. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. T. Hermann. 2008. Taxonomy and definitions for sonification and auditory display. Proc. of the 14th ICAD, Paris.(www. sonification. de/main-def. shtml).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Thomas Hermann, Andy Hunt, and John G. Neuhoff. 2011. The sonification handbook. Logos Verlag Berlin.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Kristina Höök, Martin Jonsson, Anna Ståhl, and Johanna Mercurio. Somaesthetic Appreciation Design. Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, 3131--3142. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. P. G Hunter and E. G Schellenberg. 2010. Music and Emotion. In Music Perception, Springer Handbook of Auditory Research 36. 129--164.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Martin Jonsson, Jakob Tholander, and Ylva Fernaeus. 2009. Setting the stage--Embodied and spatial dimensions in emerging programming practices. Interacting with computers 21, 1-2: 117--124. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. G. Khut. 2006. Development and Evaluation of Participant-Centred Biofeedback Artworks. Unpublished doctoral exegesis, University of Western Sydney.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. G. Kramer, B. Walker, T. Bonebright, et al. 2010. Sonification report: Status of the field and research agenda.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. D. J Levitin. 2006. This is your brain on music. Dutton Publishing.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. S. R Livingstone and W. F Thompson. 2009. The emergence of music from the Theory of Mind. Musicae Scientiae 10: 83--115.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Alvin Lucier. 1976. Statement on: music for solo performer. Biofeedback and the Arts, Results of Early Experiments. Vancouver: Aesthetic Research Center of Canada Publications: 60--61.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. E. R. Miranda and Marcelo M. Wanderley. 2006. New Digital Musical Instruments: Control And Interaction Beyond the Keyboard. AR Editions. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. B. Nettl. 2000. An ethnomusicologist contemplates universals in musical sound and musical culture. The origins of music: 463--472.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Manfred Nusseck and Marcelo M. Wanderley. 2009. Music and Motion---How Music-Related Ancillary Body Movements Contribute to the Experience of Music. Music Perception: An Interdisciplinary Journal 26, 4: 335--353.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. E. Peper, R. Harvey, and N. Takabayashi. 2009. Biofeedback an evidence based approach in clinical practice. Japanese Journal of Biofeedback Research 36, 1: 3--10.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. A. Ross. 2007. The rest is noise: Listening to the twentieth century. Farrar Straus & Giroux.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. V. N Salimpoor, M. Benovoy, K. Larcher, A. Dagher, and R. J Zatorre. 2011. Anatomically distinct dopamine release during anticipation and experience of peak emotion to music. Nature Neuroscience.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Thecla Schiphorst. 2011. Self-evidence: applying somatic connoisseurship to experience design. CHI'11 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, 145--160. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Richard Shusterman. 2008. Body consciousness: A philosophy of mindfulness and somaesthetics. Cambridge University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Vygandas Šimbelis, Anders Lundström, Kristina Höök, Jordi Solsona, and Vincent Lewandowski. 2014. Metaphone: machine aesthetics meets interaction design. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, 1--10. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. John A. Sloboda. 2005. Exploring the musical mind: cognition, emotion, ability, function. Oxford University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Jay Vidyarthi, Bernhard E. Riecke, and Diane Gromala, 2012. Sonic Cradle: designing for an immersive experience of meditation by connecting respiration to music. Proceedings of the Designing Interactive Systems Conference (DIS '12). 408--417. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. I. Wallis, T. Ingalls, T. Rikakis, et al. 2007. Real-Time Sonification of Movement for an Immersive Stroke Rehabilitation Environment. Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Auditory Display, Montréal, Canada.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Matthew Wright. 2005. Open Sound Control: an enabling technology for musical networking. Organised Sound 10, 03: 193--200. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. John Zimmerman, Jodi Forlizzi, and Shelley Evenson. 2007. Research through design as a method for interaction design research in HCI. Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, ACM, 493--502. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Sarka: Sonification and Somaesthetic Appreciation Design

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      MOCO '16: Proceedings of the 3rd International Symposium on Movement and Computing
      July 2016
      300 pages
      ISBN:9781450343077
      DOI:10.1145/2948910

      Copyright © 2016 ACM

      Publication rights licensed to ACM. ACM acknowledges that this contribution was authored or co-authored by an employee, contractor or affiliate of a national government. As such, the Government retains a nonexclusive, royalty-free right to publish or reproduce this article, or to allow others to do so, for Government purposes only.

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 5 July 2016

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate50of110submissions,45%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader