skip to main content
10.1145/295665.295678acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageswaccConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article
Free Access

The effects of narrow-band width multipoint videoconferencing on group decision making and turn distribution

Authors Info & Claims
Published:01 March 1999Publication History

ABSTRACT

This study reports an experiment that examines the effects that face-to-face meetings (FF) and two modes of videoconferencing, switching video (SV), which shows only the current speaker, and mixing video (MV), which shows each group member simultaneously, have on turn distribution and the quality of small group decision making. The subjects were 200 undergraduate students and the task was the NASA Moon Survival Problem. Multiple comparison tests indicated that MV yielded significantly higher group decision quality than FF. The other pairs, FF-SV and SV-MV, showed no significant differences. With regard to turn taking, there was almost no difference between SV-MV.

References

  1. 1.Buxton, W.A.S., Sellen, A.J., and Sheasby, M.C. Interfaces for multiparty videoconferences, in Finn, K.E., Sellen, A.J., Wilbur, S.B. (Eds.), Video- Mediated Communication. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah NJ, 1997,385-400.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.Crowcroft, J. Supporting videoconferencing on the Internet, in Finn, K.E., Sellen, A.J., Wilbur, S.B. (Eds.), Video-Mediated Communication. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah NJ, 1997,519-540.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.Culnan, M.J., and Markus, M.L. Information technologies, in Jablin, F., Putnam, L., Roberts, K., and Porter, L. (Eds.), Handbook of Organizational Communication: An Znterdisciplinaty Perspective. Sage, Newbury Park CA, 1987,420-443.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.Hall, J., and Watson, W.H. The effects of a normative intervention on group decision-making performance. Human Relations 23,4 (1970), 299-317.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. 5.Harmon, J., Schneer, J.A., and Hoffman, L.R. Electronic meetings and established decision groups: Audioconfemcing effects on perfomance and structural stability. Organizational behavior and human decision processes 61,2 (1995),138-147.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.hmami, I. lhe quality of group decisions, group verbal behavior, and intervention. Organizational behavior and human decision processes 60,3 (1994), 409-430.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.Isaacs, E.A., and Tang, J.C. Studying video-based collaboration in context From small workgroups to large organizations, in Finn, ICE., Sellen, A.J., Wilbur, S.B. (Eds.), Video-Mediated Communication. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah NJ, 1997,173-197.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.Kathleen, E.F. Introduction: An overview of videomediated communication literature, in Finn, KB., Sellen, A.J., Wilbur, S.B. (Eds.), Video-Mediated Communication. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah NJ, 1997,3-21.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.Kiesler, S., and Sproull, L. Group decision making and communication technology. Organizational behavior and human decision processes 52 (1992), 96-123.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.Lane, D.M. HyperStat: Rice virtual lab in statistics home page. Available at http:Nwww.ruf.rice.edu/-lane/hyperstat/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.Mane, A. Group space: The role of video in multipoint videoconferencing and its implications for design, in Finn, K.E., Sellen, A.J., Wilbur, S.B. (Eds.), Via'eo- Mediated Communication. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah NJ, 1997,401-414.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.McGrath, JE. Groups: Interaction and perj&nance. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs NJ, 1984.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.Olson, J.S., Olson, G.M., and Meader, D. Facetoface group work compared to remote group with and without video, in Finn, K.E., Sellen, A.J., Wilbur, S.B. (Eds.), Video-Mediated Communication. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah NJ, 1997,157-172.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.Radford, G.P., Morganstern, B.F., McMickle, C.W., and Lehr, J.K. The impact of four conferencing formats on the efficiency and quality of small group decision making in a labolatory experiment setting. Telematics andZnformatics ZZ, 2(1994), 97-109. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. 15.Telecommunication standardizatim sector of International Telecommunication Union. ZTU-T Recommendation H.231: Multipoint control units for audiovisual sysytems using digital channels up to 2 Mbit/s. International Telecommunication Union, Geneva, 19%.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.Telecommunication L?iatldardization sector of International Telecommunication Union. ZTZJ-T Recommendation H.243: Procedures for establishing communication between three or more audiovisual terminals using digital channels up to 2 Mbit/s. International Telecommunication Union, Geneva, 1996.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.I ,.vic - Video Conferencing Tool. Available at http://www-nrg.ee.lbl.gov/vic/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.Whittaker, S., and O'Conaill, B. l'he role of vision in face-to-face and mediated communication, in Finn, K.E., Sellen, A.J., Wilbur, S.B. (E&L), Video-Mediated Communication. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah NJ, 1997,23-49.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.Williams, E. Experimental comparisons of f-toface and mediated ccmmmication: A review. Psychological Bulletin 84,5( 1977),963;976.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. The effects of narrow-band width multipoint videoconferencing on group decision making and turn distribution

                  Recommendations

                  Comments

                  Login options

                  Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

                  Sign in
                  • Published in

                    cover image ACM Conferences
                    WACC '99: Proceedings of the international joint conference on Work activities coordination and collaboration
                    March 1999
                    256 pages
                    ISBN:1581130708
                    DOI:10.1145/295665

                    Copyright © 1999 ACM

                    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

                    Publisher

                    Association for Computing Machinery

                    New York, NY, United States

                    Publication History

                    • Published: 1 March 1999

                    Permissions

                    Request permissions about this article.

                    Request Permissions

                    Check for updates

                    Qualifiers

                    • Article

                    Acceptance Rates

                    WACC '99 Paper Acceptance Rate24of107submissions,22%Overall Acceptance Rate24of107submissions,22%

                  PDF Format

                  View or Download as a PDF file.

                  PDF

                  eReader

                  View online with eReader.

                  eReader