skip to main content
10.1145/2957265.2965020acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmobilehciConference Proceedingsconference-collections
extended-abstract

User perspective for interactive handbag design

Published:06 September 2016Publication History

ABSTRACT

In this paper, we address handbags as interactive mobile devices. As handbags are typical accessories carried practically by half of the adult population when on the move, they offer an interesting and widely distributed platform for mobile computing. As handbags are visible items representing the user's style, and form part of the user's overall outfit, aesthetics form an important part of their design. In this paper, we report ideas gathered from 20 participants that participated to a user study on the topic.

References

  1. Leena Arhippainen and Minna Pakanen. 2013. Utilizing Self-Expression Template Method in User Interface Design - Three Design Cases. In Proceedings of International Conference on Making Sense of Converging Media (AcademicMindTrek '13), Artur Lugmayr, Heljä Franssila, Janne Paavilainen, and Hannu Kärkkäinen (Eds.). ACM, New York, NY, USA. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2523429.2523477 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Cutecircuit 2015. Mirror Handbag. URI: http://shop.cutecircuit.com/products/mirror-handbag. (Last accessed June 10th, 2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Ashley Colley, Minna Pakanen, Saara Koskinen, Kirsi Mikkonen, and Jonna Häkkilä. 2016. Smart Handbag as a Wearable Public Display - Exploring Concepts and User Perceptions. In Proceedings of the 7th Augmented Human International Conference 2016 (AH '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2875194.2875212 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Oskar Juhlin. 2015. Digitizing fashion: software for wearable devices. interactions 22, 3 (April 2015), 44--47. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2754868 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Hsin-Liu (Cindy) Kao, Artem Dementyev, Joseph A. Paradiso, Chris Schmandt. 2015. NailO: Fingernails as an Input Surface, In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI'15), 3015--3018, ACM. doi: 10.1145/2702123.2702572 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Xin Liu, Katia Vega, Pattie Maes, and Joe A. Paradiso. 2016. Wearability Factors for Skin Interfaces. In Proceedings of the 7th Augmented Human International Conference 2016 (AH '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2875194.2875248 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Nippert-Eng, C. E. 2010. Islands of privacy. University of Chicago Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Katia Vega and Hugo Fuks. 2014. Beauty tech nails: interactive technology at your fingertips. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Tangible, Embedded and Embodied Interaction (TEI '14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 61--64. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2540930.2540961 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. User perspective for interactive handbag design

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      MobileHCI '16: Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services Adjunct
      September 2016
      664 pages
      ISBN:9781450344135
      DOI:10.1145/2957265

      Copyright © 2016 Owner/Author

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 6 September 2016

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • extended-abstract

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate202of906submissions,22%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader