skip to main content
10.1145/2957276.2996292acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesgroupConference Proceedingsconference-collections
abstract

Engaging with Users and Stakeholders: The Emotional and the Personal

Published: 13 November 2016 Publication History

Abstract

HCI and CSCW researchers and practitioners are increasingly working in complex social and political contexts where their research activities involve emotional labor and where they have to confront moral and emotional dilemmas. Given the potential impact of these challenging situations on the wellbeing of researchers in the field, there is much need for a discourse on affective impact of research on the researcher. In this workshop, we invite discussion and reflection on the experiences of distress and the role of informal coping mechanisms (e.g., personal narratives) to address them. We will create a forum where researchers and practitioners can discuss and share experiences of projects in sensitive settings and work towards guidelines to inform future projects.

References

[1]
Alaoui, M., Lewkowicz, M. 2015. Practical issues related to the implication of elderlies in the design process. The case of a Living Lab approach for designing and evaluating social TV services. IRBM Journal Innovation and Research in BioMedical Engineering, 36 (5), 259--265.
[2]
Baljko, M. 2016. Technology-mediated community: the digital, the interactive and commemorative tattoo practice. In The Tattoo Project: Creating a Digital Archive for Commemorative Tattoos. Davidson, D. (Ed.). Canadian Scholars' Press.
[3]
Crabtree, A., Hemmings, T., Rodden, T., Cheverst, K., Clarke, K., Hughes, J. and Rouncefield, M. 2003. Designing with care: Adapting cultural probes to inform design in sensitive settings, In Proc. of the Australian Special Interest Group for Computer Human Interaction, 4--13.
[4]
Dahl, Y. and Holbø, K. 2012. Value biases of sensor-based assistive technology: case study of a GPS tracking system used in dementia care. In Proc. of the Designing Interactive Systems Conference, 572--581.
[5]
Davidson, D., Baljko, M., and Letherby, G. 2012. Griefwork online: Community through computer-mediated communication. In Proc. of the Motherhood Initiative for Research and Community Involvement Conference. Toronto, Canada.
[6]
Davis, H. and Waycott, J. 2015. Ethical Encounters: HCI Research in Sensitive and Complex Settings. In Proc. of the Australian Special Interest Group for Computer Human Interaction, 667--669.
[7]
Hamidi, F., Saenz, K., and Baljko, M. 2014. Sparkles of brilliance: incorporating cultural and social context in codesign of digital artworks. In Proc. of the Conference on Interaction Design and Children, 77--84.
[8]
Hamidi, F., Baljko, M., Ecomomopoulos, C., Livingston, N. J., and Spalteholz, L. G. 2015. Co-designing a speech interface for people with dysarthria. Journal of Assistive Technologies, 9(3), 159--173.
[9]
Hamidi, F., Baljko, M., Kunic, T., and Feraday, R. 2015. TalkBox: a DIY communication board case study. Journal of Assistive Technologies, 9(4), 187--198.
[10]
Lindsay, S., Brittain, K., Jackson, D., Ladha, C., Ladha, K. and Olivier, P. 2012. Empathy, Participatory Design and People with Dementia. In Proc. of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 521--530.
[11]
Moncur, W. 2013. The emotional wellbeing of researchers: considerations for practice. In Proc. of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1883--1890.
[12]
Mankoff, J., Hayes, G. R., and Kasnitz, D. 2010. Disability studies as a source of critical inquiry for the field of assistive technology. In Proc. of the Conference on Computers and Accessibility, 3--10.
[13]
Mitchell, W., and Irvine, A. 2008. I'm okay, you're okay?: Reflections on the well-being and ethical requirements of researchers and research participants in conducting qualitative fieldwork interviews. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 7(4), 31--44.
[14]
Müller, C., Neufeldt, C., Randall, D., and Wulf, V. 2012. ICT-development in residential care settings: sensitizing design to the life circumstances of the residents of a care home. In Proc. of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2639--2648.
[15]
Orr, J. E. 1990. Sharing knowledge, celebrating identity: Community memory in a service culture. Collective remembering, 169, 189.
[16]
Rode, J. A. 2011. Reflexivity in digital anthropology. In Proc. of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 123--132.
[17]
Rogers, Y., and Marsden, G. 2013. Does he take sugar?: moving beyond the rhetoric of compassion. Interactions, 20(4), 48--57.
[18]
Schorch, M., Wan, L., Randall, D. and Wulf, V. 2016. Designing for those who are overlooked: Insider perspectives on care practices and cooperative work of elderly informal caregivers. In Proc. Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing, 787--799.
[19]
Stangl, A., Hsu, C. L., and Yeh, T. 2015. Transcribing Across the Senses: Community Efforts to Create 3D Printable Accessible Tactile Pictures for Young Children with Visual Impairments. In Proc. of the Conference on Computers & Accessibility, 127--137.
[20]
Taylor, S. E., Aspinwall, L. G., Giuliano, T. A., Dakof, G. A., and Reardon, K. K. 1993. Storytelling and Coping With Stressful Events. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 23(9), 703--733.
[21]
Tixier, M. and Lewkowicz, M. 2015. Looking for Respite and Support: Technological Opportunities for Spousal Caregivers. In Proc. of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1155--1158
[22]
Tonolli, L., Teli, M., and D'Andrea, V. 2015. A Design Anthropology Critique of Active Aging as Ageism. Interaction Design and Architecture(s) Journal, 26: 95--113.
[23]
Wan, L., Müller, C., Wulf, V., and Randall, D. W. 2014. Addressing the subtleties in dementia care: pre-study & evaluation of a GPS monitoring system. In Proc. of Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 3987--3996.
[24]
Waycott, J., Davis, H., Thieme, A., Branham, S., Vines, J., and Munteanu, C. 2015. Ethical encounters in HCI: Research in Sensitive Settings. In Proc. of the Conference EA on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2369--2372.
[25]
Woodthorpe, K. 2007. My life after death: connecting the field, the findings and the feelings. Anthropology Matters, 9(1).
[26]
Wright, P., and McCarthy, J. 2008. Empathy and experience in HCI. In Proc. of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 637--646.
[27]
Wulf, V., Aal, K., Abu Kteish, I., Atam, M., Schubert, K., Yerousis, G., Randall, D., and Rohde, M. 2013. Fighting against the wall: Social media use by political activists in a Palestinian village. In Proc. of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1979--1988.

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)Mutually Designing Domestic IT Applications with Older AdultsVarieties of Cooperation10.1007/978-3-658-39037-2_10(203-223)Online publication date: 3-Mar-2023
  • (2019)Considerations for AI fairness for people with disabilitiesAI Matters10.1145/3362077.33620865:3(40-63)Online publication date: 6-Dec-2019

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
GROUP '16: Proceedings of the 2016 ACM International Conference on Supporting Group Work
November 2016
534 pages
ISBN:9781450342766
DOI:10.1145/2957276
Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 13 November 2016

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. aging
  2. disability
  3. emotion
  4. ethics
  5. marginalization
  6. methodology
  7. participatory design
  8. qualitative research
  9. reflection
  10. sensitive settings
  11. usercentered design
  12. validity

Qualifiers

  • Abstract

Conference

GROUP '16
Sponsor:
GROUP '16: 2016 ACM Conference on Supporting Groupwork
November 13 - 16, 2016
Florida, Sanibel Island, USA

Acceptance Rates

GROUP '16 Paper Acceptance Rate 36 of 111 submissions, 32%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 125 of 405 submissions, 31%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)14
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
Reflects downloads up to 27 Feb 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)Mutually Designing Domestic IT Applications with Older AdultsVarieties of Cooperation10.1007/978-3-658-39037-2_10(203-223)Online publication date: 3-Mar-2023
  • (2019)Considerations for AI fairness for people with disabilitiesAI Matters10.1145/3362077.33620865:3(40-63)Online publication date: 6-Dec-2019

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media