skip to main content
10.1145/2961111.2962625acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesesemConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

Preliminary Findings about the Nature of Work in Software Engineering: An Exploratory Survey

Authors Info & Claims
Published:08 September 2016Publication History

ABSTRACT

Context: Work Design refers to the different ways in which a given work or task can be designed and performed. The study of work design is important because every decision related to how the work is performed can affect the outcomes of individuals and the effectiveness of teamwork. Goal: To investigate work design characteristics of software engineering work and identify areas for future research. Method: We performed a survey with professional software engineers working in different commercial software companies in Brazil. We sent invitations to just over 150 professionals and received 77 valid answers from participants working in 35 distinct software companies. We measured 21 work design constructs, as well as job burnout, role conflict, role ambiguity, and two constructs related to job rotation. Results: Comparisons of our sample with other sample consisting of a diversity of professions showed that software engineering work has distinct characteristics, but some results require further investigation. Conclusion: We identified relevant characteristics of software engineering work and areas for further research. In particular, longitudinal studies are needed to address the temporal variations impossible to identify in cross sectional studies.

References

  1. Carifio, J.; Perla, R.J. (2007) Ten Common Misunderstandings, Misconceptions, Persistent Myths and Urban Legends about Likert Scales and Likert Response Formats and their Antidotes. Journal of Social Sciences 3 (3): 106--116.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. França, A. C. C et al. (2011) Motivation in Software Engineering: a Systematic Review Update. In: 15th International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering, Durham.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Grant, A.M.; Fired, Y.; Juillerat, T. 2011. Work Matters: Job Design in Classic and Contemporary Perspectives. Chapter 13, APA Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Vol 1: Building and Developing the Organization, edited by S. Zedeck.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R. 1974. The Job Diagnostic Survey: An instrument for the diagnosis of Jobs and the evaluation of job redesign projects (p. 88). New Haven.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Hackman, J. R.;Oldham, G. R. 1980. Work redesign. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Hackman, J. R. 1980. Work redesign and motivation. Professional Psychology, 11(3), 445--455. doi:10.1037//0735-7028.11.3.445Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Hackman, J. R.; Oldham, G. R. 1976. Motivation through the design of work: Test of a theory. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 16. pp. 250--279.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Hsieh, A.; Chao, H. 2004. A Reassessment of the Relationship between Job Specialization, Job Rotation and Job Burnout: Example of Taiwan's High-technology Industry'. International Journal of Human Resource Management.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Maslach, C., Jackson, S.E. and Leiter, M.P. 1996. Maslach Burnout Inventory Manual. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press, pp. 19--26.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Morgeson, F. P., & Humphrey, S. E. 2006. The Work Design Questionnaire (WDQ): Developing and validating a comprehensive measure for assessing job design and the nature of work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 1321--1339.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Morgeson, F. P., & Humphrey, S. E. 2008. Job and team design: Toward a more integrative conceptualization of work design. In J. Martocchio (Ed.), Research in personnel and human resource management (Vol. 27, pp. 39--92). Bingley, England: Emerald Group Publishing.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Ollo-Lopez, A.; Bayo-Moriones, A.; Larraza-Kintana, M. The relationship between new work practices and employee effort. Journal of industrial relations. Vol. 52, no. 2, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Rizzo, J.R., House, R.J. and Lirtzman, S.I. (1970) 'Role Conflict and Ambiguity in Complex Organizations', Administrative Science, 15(June): 150--63.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Santos, R. E. S.; Da Silva, F. Q. B.; De Magalhães, C. V. C.; Monteiro, C. V. F. 2016. Building a Theory of Job Rotation in Software Engineering from an Instrumental Case Study. In: 38th International Conference on Software Engineering -- ICSE'2016, Austin, TX. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2884781.2884837. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Santos, R. E. S.; Da Silva, F. Q. B.; De Magalhães, C. V. C. 2016. Benefits and Limitations of Job Rotation in Software Organizations: A Systematic Literature Review. 2016. In: 20th International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering, EASE'2016, Limerick. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/12345.67890 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Van de Ven, A.H. and Ferry, D. (1980) Measuring and Assessing Organizations. New York: Wiley.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Viteles, M.S. 1950. 'Man and Machine Relationship: The Problem of Boredom'. In Ross, R.B. (ed.) Proceedings of the Annual Fall Conference of the Society for Advancement of Management. New York, pp. 129--38.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Wallgren, L. G.; Hanse, J. J. 2007. Job characteristics, motivators and stress among information technology consultants: A structural equation modeling approach. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, p. 51--59.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Woods, R. 1995. Human Resources Management. AHMA. Michigan.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Conferences
    ESEM '16: Proceedings of the 10th ACM/IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement
    September 2016
    457 pages
    ISBN:9781450344272
    DOI:10.1145/2961111

    Copyright © 2016 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 8 September 2016

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • short-paper
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Acceptance Rates

    ESEM '16 Paper Acceptance Rate27of122submissions,22%Overall Acceptance Rate130of594submissions,22%

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader