skip to main content
research-article
Public Access

Agnostic Learning in Permutation-Invariant Domains

Published: 03 August 2016 Publication History

Abstract

We generalize algorithms from computational learning theory that are successful under the uniform distribution on the Boolean hypercube {0, 1}n to algorithms successful on permutation-invariant distributions, distributions that stay invariant constant on permutating the coordinates in the instances. While the tools in our generalization mimic those used for the Boolean hypercube, the fact that permutation-invariant distributions are not product distributions presents a significant obstacle.
We prove analogous results for permutation-invariant distributions; more generally, we work in the domain of the symmetric group. We define noise sensitivity in this setting and show that noise sensitivity has a nice combinatorial interpretation in terms of Young tableaux. The main technical innovations involve techniques from the representation theory of the symmetric group, especially the combinatorics of Young tableaux. We show that low noise sensitivity implies concentration on “simple” components of the Fourier spectrum and that this fact will allow us to agnostically learn halfspaces under permutation-invariant distributions to constant accuracy in roughly the same time as in the uniform distribution over the Boolean hypercube case.

References

[1]
Eric Blais, Ryan O’Donnell, and Karl Wimmer. 2010. Polynomial regression under arbitrary product distributions. Mach. Learn. 80, 2 (2010), 273--294. http://www.springerlink.com/index/988211hq3v2q5171.pdf.
[2]
Dan Boneh. 1995. Learning using group representations. In Proceedings of the Eighth Annual Conference on Computational Learning Theory. ACM, 418--426. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=225349
[3]
Persi Diaconis. 1988. Group representations in probability and statistics. Lecture Notes-Monograph Series 11 (1988), i--192. http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/4355560.
[4]
David Ellis, Ehud Friedgut, and Haran Pilpel. 2011. Intersecting families of permutations. J. Am. Math. Soc. 24, 3 (2011), 649--682.
[5]
Vitaly Feldman and Pravesh Kothari. 2015. Agnostic learning of disjunctions on symmetric distributions. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 16 (2015), 3455--3467.
[6]
William Fulton. 1997. Young Tableaux: With Applications to Representation Theory and Geometry. Vol. 35. Cambridge University Press.
[7]
Jonathan Huang, Carlos Guestrin, and Leonidas Guibas. 2009. Fourier theoretic probabilistic inference over permutations. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 10 (2009), 997--1070. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1577106
[8]
G. D. James and Adalbert Kerber. 1981. The Representation Theory of the Symmetric Group. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA. pp. xxviii, 510.
[9]
Adam Tauman Kalai, Adam R. Klivans, Yishay Mansour, and Rocco A. Servedio. 2008. Agnostically learning halfspaces. SIAM J. Comput. 37, 6 (2008), 1777--1805. http://epubs.siam.org/doi/abs/10.1137/060649057.
[10]
Adam Tauman Kalai, Alex Samorodnitsky, and Shang-Hua Teng. 2009. Learning and smoothed analysis. In Foundations of Computer Science, 2009. FOCS’09. 50th Annual IEEE Symposium on. IEEE, 395--404. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpls/abs_all.jsp?arnumber=5438615.
[11]
Daniel M. Kane, Adam Klivans, and Raghu Meka. 2013. Learning halfspaces under log-concave densities: Polynomial approximations and moment matching. In COLT. 522--545.
[12]
Jovan Karamata. 1932. Sur une inégalité rélative aux fonctions convexes. Publ. Math. Univ. Belgrade 1 (1932), 145--148.
[13]
Michael J. Kearns, Robert E. Schapire, and Linda M. Sellie. 1994. Toward efficient agnostic learning. Mach. Learn. 17, 2--3 (1994), 115--141. http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF00993468.
[14]
Adam R. Klivans, Ryan O’Donnell, and Rocco A. Servedio. 2004. Learning intersections and thresholds of halfspaces. J. Comput. Syst. Sci. 68, 4 (2004), 808--840.
[15]
Risi Kondor and Karsten M. Borgwardt. 2008. The skew spectrum of graphs. In Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Machine Learning. ACM, 496--503. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1390219
[16]
Risi Kondor, Andrew Howard, and Tony Jebara. 2007. Multi-object tracking with representations of the symmetric group. In International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics. 211--218.
[17]
Nathan Linial, Yishay Mansour, and Noam Nisan. 1993. Constant depth circuits, Fourier transform, and learnability. J. ACM 40, 3 (1993), 607--620. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=174138
[18]
Ryan O’Donnell. 2007. Lecture notes on analysis of boolean functions. (2007).
[19]
Ryan O’Donnell and Karl Wimmer. 2009. KKL, Kruskal-Katona, and monotone nets. In Foundations of Computer Science, 2009. FOCS’09. 50th Annual IEEE Symposium on. IEEE, 725--734. http://ieeexplore. ieee.org/xpls/abs_all.jsp?arnumber=5438582.
[20]
Andrei Okounkov and Grigori Olshanski. 1998. Shifted Schur functions. St. Petersburg Math. J. 9, 2 (1998), 239--300.
[21]
Yuval Peres. 2004. Noise stability of weighted majority. arXiv preprint math/0412377 (2004). http://arxiv.org/ abs/math/0412377.
[22]
Pannagadatta K. Shivaswamy and Tony Jebara. 2006. Permutation invariant SVMs. In Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Machine Learning. ACM, 817--824. http://dl.acm.org/citation. cfm?id=1143947

Index Terms

  1. Agnostic Learning in Permutation-Invariant Domains

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Transactions on Algorithms
    ACM Transactions on Algorithms  Volume 12, Issue 4
    September 2016
    310 pages
    ISSN:1549-6325
    EISSN:1549-6333
    DOI:10.1145/2983296
    Issue’s Table of Contents
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 03 August 2016
    Accepted: 01 November 2015
    Received: 01 January 2015
    Published in TALG Volume 12, Issue 4

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. Fourier analysis
    2. Learning theory
    3. representation theory of the symmetric group

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed

    Funding Sources

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • 0
      Total Citations
    • 330
      Total Downloads
    • Downloads (Last 12 months)40
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)4
    Reflects downloads up to 03 Mar 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    View Options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Login options

    Full Access

    Figures

    Tables

    Media

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media