skip to main content
10.1145/2964284.2964300acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmmConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

A Pragmatically Designed Adaptive and Web-compliant Object-based Video Streaming Methodology: Implementation and Subjective Evaluation

Authors Info & Claims
Published:01 October 2016Publication History

ABSTRACT

The bulk of contemporary online video traffic is encoded in a traditional manner, hereby neglecting most, if not all, of the semantics of the underlying visual scene. One essential piece of semantic information in the context of video streaming is awareness of the objects that jointly constitute the scene. A canonical example of a benefit associated with such object awareness is the ability to subdivide a video fragment in respectively a background and one or more foreground objects. This paper reports on a pragmatically designed video streaming approach that exploits object-related knowledge in order to improve the real-time adaptability of video streaming sessions (manifested in the form of increased granularity in terms of streaming quality control). The proposed approach is completely compliant with present-day video codecs and HTTP Adaptive Streaming schemes, most notably H.264 and MPEG-DASH. Findings from subjecting the proposed video streaming technique to a comparative subjective evaluation suggest that scenarios exist where the presented approach holds the capacity to improve on traditional streaming in terms of user-perceived video quality.

References

  1. Adobe After Effects CC tutorials. Use the Roto Brush. Online, https://helpx.adobe.com/after-effects/how-to/aftereffects-roto-brush-cc.html, 2016.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. P. R. Alface, J.-F. Macq, F. Lee, and W. Bailer. Adaptive coding of high-resolution panoramic video using visual saliency. In Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Interactive Content Consumption at EuroITV 2013, June 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. S. A. Goor and L. Murphy. An adaptive MPEG-4 streaming system based on object prioritisation. In Proceedings of Irish Signals and Systems Conference, July 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. A. Hakeem, K. Shafique, and M. Shah. An object-based video coding framework for video sequences obtained from static cameras. In Proceedings of ACM MULTIMEDIA '05, pages 608--617, New York, NY, USA, 2005. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. M.-H. Hsiao, H.-P. Kuo, H.-C. Wu, Y.-K. Chen, and S.-Y. Lee. Object-based video streaming technique with application to intelligent transportation systems. In IEEE International Conference on Networking, Sensing and Control, volume 1, pages 315--320, March 2004.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. ISO/IEC 14496--2:1999. Information technology -- Coding of audio-visual objects -- Part 2: Visual, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. ISO/IEC 23009--1. Information technology -- Dynamic adaptive streaming over HTTP (DASH) -- Part 1: Media presentation description and segment formats, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. ITU-T P.910. Subjective video quality assessment methods for multimedia applications, April 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. D. Kimber, T. Dunnigan, A. Girgensohn, F. Shipman, T. Turner, and T. Yang. Trailblazing: Video playback control by direct object manipulation. In 2007 IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo, pages 1015--1018, July 2007.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. C. Nguyen, Y. Niu, and F. Liu. Direct manipulation video navigation in 3D. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI '13, pages 1169--1172, New York, NY, USA, 2013. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. S. Péchard, R. Pépion, and P. L. Callet. Suitable methodology in subjective video quality assessment: A resolution dependent paradigm. In International Workshop on Image Media Quality and its Applications, IMQA2008, Kyoto, Japan, September 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. S. Poullot and S. Satoh. VabCut: A video extension of GrabCut for unsupervised video foreground object segmentation. In 2014 International Conference on Computer Vision Theory and Applications, volume 2, pages 362--371, January 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. A. Puri and A. Eleftheriadis. MPEG-4: An object-based multimedia coding standard supporting mobile applications. Mobile Networks and Applications, 3(1):5--32, June 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. P. Quax, P. Issaris, W. Vanmontfort, and W. Lamotte. Evaluation of distribution of panoramic video sequences in the eXplorative Television project. In 22nd International Workshop on Network and Operating System Support for Digital Audio and Video, NOSSDAV '12, pages 45--50, New York, NY, USA, 2012. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. H. Schwarz, D. Marpe, and T. Wiegand. Overview of the Scalable Video Coding extension of the H.264/AVC standard. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, 17(9):1103--1120, September 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. A. Vetro and H. Sun. An overview of MPEG-4 object-based encoding algorithms. In International Conference on Information Technology: Coding and Computing, pages 366--369, April 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. A. Vetro, H. Sun, and Y. Wang. Object-based transcoding for adaptable video content delivery. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, 11(3):387--401, March 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. W3C Candidate Recommendation. Media Source Extensions. Online, https://www.w3.org/TR/media-source/, November 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. H. Wang, V.-T. Nguyen, W. T. Ooi, and M. C. Chan. Mixing tile resolutions in tiled video: A perceptual quality assessment. In 24th International Workshop on Network and Operating System Support on Digital Audio and Video, NOSSDAV '14, pages 25--30, New York, NY, USA, 2014. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. J. Wuenschmann, T. Roll, C. Feller, and A. Rothermel. Analysis and improvements to the object based video encoder MPEG 4 part 25. In 2011 IEEE International Conference on Consumer Electronics - Berlin, pages 115--119, September 2011.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. A Pragmatically Designed Adaptive and Web-compliant Object-based Video Streaming Methodology: Implementation and Subjective Evaluation

                    Recommendations

                    Comments

                    Login options

                    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

                    Sign in
                    • Published in

                      cover image ACM Conferences
                      MM '16: Proceedings of the 24th ACM international conference on Multimedia
                      October 2016
                      1542 pages
                      ISBN:9781450336031
                      DOI:10.1145/2964284

                      Copyright © 2016 ACM

                      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

                      Publisher

                      Association for Computing Machinery

                      New York, NY, United States

                      Publication History

                      • Published: 1 October 2016

                      Permissions

                      Request permissions about this article.

                      Request Permissions

                      Check for updates

                      Qualifiers

                      • research-article

                      Acceptance Rates

                      MM '16 Paper Acceptance Rate52of237submissions,22%Overall Acceptance Rate995of4,171submissions,24%

                      Upcoming Conference

                      MM '24
                      MM '24: The 32nd ACM International Conference on Multimedia
                      October 28 - November 1, 2024
                      Melbourne , VIC , Australia

                    PDF Format

                    View or Download as a PDF file.

                    PDF

                    eReader

                    View online with eReader.

                    eReader