skip to main content
10.1145/2966986.2967025guideproceedingsArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesConference Proceedingsacm-pubtype
research-article

DSA-compliant routing for two-dimensional patterns using block copolymer lithography

Authors Info & Claims
Published:07 November 2016Publication History

ABSTRACT

Two-dimensional (2D) directed self-assembly (DSA) is an emerging lithography for the 5 nm process node and beyond that can substantially increase design flexibility in critical routing layers and reduce the number of cuts for better yield. The state-of-the-art 2D DSA process manipulates the orientation of double posts inside guiding templates to guide block copolymers (BCPs) to form 2D patterns. However, a key challenge arises on how to correctly assign double post orientations and place cut patterns to make desired net connections for a given routing instance. In this paper, we propose a novel 2D DSA-compliant routing framework, named 2D-DCR, to systematically derive feasible orientation assignments for double posts to maximize routability. Specifically, 2D-DCR features a complete set of new routing rules which transform the underlying physical BCP growth principles for large-scale routing, adopts a network-flow-based double-post assignment routing algorithm, and leverages a 2D DSA line-end creation property to maximally reduce line-end cuts. Experimental results show that our 2D-DCR can effectively generate a 2D DSA-compliant routing solution with zero double post conflicts, maximized routability, and minimized the number of cuts.

References

  1. [1].Berggren K. K., Ross C. A., Do H.-W., Chang J.-B., and Cho H.-K., “Cell-based design methods for directed self-assembly”, Proc. ISPD, pp. 37, 2016.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. [2].Chang J.-B., Choi H.-K., Hannon A. F., Alexander-Katz A., Ross C. A., Berggren K. K., and Ma Y., “Design rules for self-assembled block copolymer patterns using tiled templates”, Nature Communications, no. 5, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. [3].Ding X., Chu C., and Mak W.-K., “Throughput optimization for SADP and E-beam based manufacturing of 1D Layout”, Proc. DAC, pp. 1 6, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. [4].Du Y., Zhang H., Wong M.-D.-F., and Chao K.-Y., “Hybrid lithography optimization with E-beam and immersion processes for 16nm 1D gridded design”, Proc. ASPDAC, pp. 707 712, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. [5].Du Y., Guo D., Wong M.-D.-F., Zhang H.-S. P. H., and Ma Q., “Block copolymer directed self-assembly (DSA) aware contact layer optimization for 10 nm 1D standard cell library”, Proc. ICCAD, pp. 186 193, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. [6].Du Y., Xiao D., Wong M.-D.-F., Yi H., and Wong H.-S.P., “DSA-aware detailed routing for via layer optimization”, Proc. SPIE, vol. 9049, pp. 90492J, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. [7].Duan H., Winston D., Yang J. K. W., Cord B. M., Manfrinato V. R., and Berggren K. K., “Sub-10-nm half-pitch electron-beam lithography by using PMMA as a negative resist”, J.-Vac.-Sci.-Technol.-B 28, vol. C6C58. 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. [8].Jeong S.-J., Kim J. Y., Kim B. H., Moon H.-S., and Kim S. O., “Directed self-assembly of block copolymers for next generation nanolithography”, Materials Today, vol. 16, no. 12, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. [9].Hannon A. F., Ding Y., Bai W., Ross C. A., and Alexander-Katz A.Optimizing topographical templates for directed self-assembly of block copolymers via inverse design simulations”, ACS Nano Letters, vol. 14, pp. 318 325, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. [10].2015 International technology roadmap for semiconductors, http://www.itrs2.net/itrs-reports.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. [11].Kuang J., Ye J., and Young E. F. Y., “Simultaneous template optimization and mask assignment for DSA with multiple patterning”, Proc. ASPDAC, pp. 312 318, 2016.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. [12].Lin Z.-W. and Chang Y.-W., “Cut redistribution with directed self-assembly templates for advanced 1-D gridded layouts”, Proc. ASPDAC, pp. 10 18, 2016.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. [13].Lin Z.-W. and Chang Y.-W., “Double-patterning aware DSA template guided cut redistribution for advanced 1-D gridded designs”, Proc. ISPD, pp. 2 9, 2016.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. [14].Ma Y., Torres J. A., Fenger G., Granik Y., Ryckaert J., Vanderberghe G., Bekaert J., and Word J.Challenges and opportunities in applying grapho-epitaxy DSA lithography to metal cut and contact/via applications”, Proc. SPIE, vol. 9231, pp. 92310T, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. [15].Ou J., Yu B., Gao J.-R., M. P., A. L., and Pan D.-Z., “Directed self-assembly based cut mask optimization for unidirectional design”, Proc. GVLSI, pp. 33 37, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. [16].Rathsack B., Somervell M., Hoose J., Muramatsu M., Tanouchi K., Kitano T., Nishimura E., Yatsuda K., Nagahara S., Hiroyuki I., Akai K., and Hayakawa T., “Pattern scaling with directed self assembly through lithography and etch process integraiton”, Proc. SPIE, vol. 8323, pp. 83230B, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. [17].Su Y.-H. and Chang Y.-W., “Nanowire-aware routing considering high cut mask complexity”, Proc. DAC, pp. 1 6, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. [18].Xiao Z., Du Y., Tian H., and Wong M. D. F., “DSA template mask determination and cut redistribution for advanced 1D gridded design”, Proc. SPIE, vol. 8880, pp. 888017 1, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. [19].IBM ILOG CPLEX Optimizer. http://www-01.ibm.com/software/integration/optimization/cplex-optimizer/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. DSA-compliant routing for two-dimensional patterns using block copolymer lithography
        Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image Guide Proceedings
          2016 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Computer-Aided Design (ICCAD)
          Nov 2016
          946 pages

          Copyright © 2016

          Publisher

          IEEE Press

          Publication History

          • Published: 7 November 2016

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Qualifiers

          • research-article