skip to main content
10.1145/2968219.2968321acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesubicompConference Proceedingsconference-collections
extended-abstract

Menthal: quantifying smartphone usage

Published:12 September 2016Publication History

ABSTRACT

We present some of the methods for quantifying mobile phone usage used in the Menthal app. We show that single numbers work for promoting an idea but more complex visualizations retain users. The Menthal app works as a digital scale and keeps the user updated with his current usage habits. In particular we describe the MScore, a simple way of quantifying mobile phone usage by a single number. By displaying it as a notification, we are reminding the users of their potential phone overuse. We present information in a simple way, allowing user to dig deeper into different aspects of their behaviour through a dashboard. Additionally, we show our methods for correlating multiple measurements in an attractive way.

References

  1. Jessica S Ancker and David Kaufman. 2007. Rethinking health numeracy: A multidisciplinary literature review. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 14, 6 (2007), 713--721.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Ionut Andone, Konrad Blaszkiewicz, Mark Eibes, Boris Trendafilov, Christian Montag, and Alexander Markowetz. 2016. Menthal - Running a Science Project as a Start-Up. In Computing in Mental Health, Workshop at CHI 2016. ACM.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Eun Kyoung Choe, Bongshin Lee, and MC Schraefel. 2015. Characterizing Visualization Insights from Quantified Selfers' Personal Data Presentations. Computer Graphics and Applications, IEEE 35, 4 (2015), 28--37.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Eun Kyoung Choe, Nicole B Lee, Bongshin Lee, Wanda Pratt, and Julie A Kientz. 2014. Understanding quantified-selfers' practices in collecting and exploring personal data. In Proceedings of the 32nd annual ACM conference on Human factors in computing systems. ACM, 1143--1152. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Ericsson. 2016. Ericsson Mobility Report. (2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Mirta Galesic and Rocio Garcia-Retamero. 2011. Graph literacy a cross-cultural comparison. Medical Decision Making 31, 3 (2011), 444--457.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Hamed Haddadi and Ian Brown. 2014. Quantified self and the privacy challenge. Technology Law Futures (2014).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Dize Hilviu and Amon Rapp. 2015. Narrating the quantified self. In Proceedings of the 2015 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing and Proceedings of the 2015 ACM International Symposium on Wearable Computers. ACM, 1051--1056. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Simon L Jones. 2015. Exploring correlational information in aggregated quantified self data dashboards. In Proceedings of the 2015 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing and Proceedings of the 2015 ACM International Symposium on Wearable Computers. ACM, 1075--1080. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Ian Li, Anind Dey, and Jodi Forlizzi. 2010. A stage-based model of personal informatics systems. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 557--566. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Ian Li, Jon Froehlich, Jakob E Larsen, Catherine Grevet, and Ernesto Ramirez. 2013. Personal informatics in the wild: hacking habits for health & happiness. In CHI'13 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 3179--3182. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Lena Mamykina, Elizabeth Mynatt, Patricia Davidson, and Daniel Greenblatt. 2008. MAHI: investigation of social scaffolding for reflective thinking in diabetes management. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 477--486. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Alessandro Marcengo and Amon Rapp. 2014. Visualization of human behavior data: the quantified self. Innovative approaches of data visualization and visual analytics 1 (2014), 236--265.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Alexander Markowetz. 2015. Digitaler Burnout: Warum unsere permanente Smartphone-Nutzung gefährlichist. Droemer eBook.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Konrad Tollmar, Frank Bentley, Cristobal Viedma, and IL Libertyville. 2012. Mobile health mashups. Proc. PervasiveHealth 12 (2012).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Gary Wolf, A Carmichael, and K Kelly. 2010. The quantified self. TED http://www.ted.com/talks/gary_wolf_the_quantified_self.html (2010).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Menthal: quantifying smartphone usage

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      UbiComp '16: Proceedings of the 2016 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing: Adjunct
      September 2016
      1807 pages
      ISBN:9781450344623
      DOI:10.1145/2968219

      Copyright © 2016 Owner/Author

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 12 September 2016

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • extended-abstract

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate764of2,912submissions,26%

      Upcoming Conference

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader