skip to main content
10.1145/2970930.2970967acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesecceConference Proceedingsconference-collections
panel

Creativity and Collaboration in Software Design and Development

Published:05 September 2016Publication History

ABSTRACT

This extended abstract summarises some key points regarding the role of representations in software design and development, specifically how physical, virtual and hybrid representations support creativity and collaboration.

References

  1. Brooks, F. (1995) The Mythical Man-Month, Anniversary Edition. Boston, MA, USA: Addison Wesley Longman Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Gothelf, J. with Seiden, J. (2013) Lean UX. O'ReillyGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Henney, K. (2010) 97 Things Every programmer Should Know, O'Reilly. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Hoda, R., Noble, J., Marshall, S. (2013) Self-Organizing Roles on Agile Software Development Teams. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 39(3), 422--444. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Lotz, N., Sharp, H., Blyth, R., Woodroffe, M., Rajah, D. and Ranganai, T. (2013) 'Sketch-based Design Ideation in Novice Interaction Designers' in Proceedings of GIDEC 2013, September 2013, Gaborone Botswana.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Maiden, N. A. M., Ncube, C. and Robertson, S. (2007) Can requirements be creative? Experiences with an enhanced air space management system. In Proceedings of ICSE '07 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Preece, J., Sharp, H. and Rogers, Y. (2015) Interaction Design (4th edition), John WileyGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Rogers, Y., Paay, J., Brereton, M., Vaisutis, K., Marsden, G. and Vetere, F. (2014) Never Too Old: Engaging Retired People Inventing the Future with MaKey MaKey. In Proc. CHI 2014, ACM, 2675--2684 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Sharp, H.C. (2008) Customer collaboration in distributed agile teams. In: Proceedings of Distributed Participatory Design Workshop, CHI 2008, FlorenceGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Sharp, H., Giuffrida, R., and Melnik, G. (2012) Information Flow within a Dispersed Agile Team: A Distributed Cognition Perspective. Agile Processes in Software Engineering and Extreme Programming. Springer, 62--76.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Sharp, H. and Robinson, H. (2008) Collaboration and Coordination in Mature eXtreme Programming Teams. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies. 66(7), 506--518. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Sharp, H., Robinson, H.M. and Petre, M. (2009) The Role of Physical Artefacts in Agile Software Development: two complementary perspectives, Interacting with Computers, 21(1-2) 108--116 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Sharp, H., Robinson, H., Segal, J., and Furniss, D. (2006) The Role of Story Cards and the Wall in XP teams: a distributed cognition perspective. In Proceedings of the conference on Agile 2006, 65--75. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    ECCE '16: Proceedings of the European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics
    September 2016
    193 pages
    ISBN:9781450342445
    DOI:10.1145/2970930

    Copyright © 2016 Owner/Author

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 5 September 2016

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • panel
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Acceptance Rates

    ECCE '16 Paper Acceptance Rate27of37submissions,73%Overall Acceptance Rate56of91submissions,62%
  • Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)2
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

    Other Metrics

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader