skip to main content
10.1145/2970930.2970968acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesecceConference Proceedingsconference-collections
panel

The Digital Sketch as a Central Object of Representation Systems in Creative Design

Published:05 September 2016Publication History

ABSTRACT

This communication takes place in the panel discussion "Multiple representations in design: fostering creativity and collaboration". The following text is an extended abstract of the communication.

References

  1. Brown, A.G.P. 2003. Visualization as a common design language: connecting art and science. Automation in Construction, 12, 703--713.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Dorta, T. (2007) "Implementing and Assessing the Hybrid Ideation Space: a Cognitive Artifact for Conceptual Design", in International Journal of Design Sciences and Technology. Volume 14 Number 2, pp. 119--133.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Dorta T. and Kinayoglu G. (2014) ≪ Towards A New Representational Ecosystem for The Design Studio ≫, N. Gu, S. Watanabe, H. Erhan, H. Haeusler, W. Huang, R. Sosa (eds.), Rethinking Comprehensive Design: Speculative Counterculture, Proceedings of the 19th International Conference of the Association of Computer-Aided Architectural Design Research in Asia CAADRIA 2014, Kyoto, Japon, pp. 699--708.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Goldschmidt, G. (2003). The backtalk of self-generated sketches. Design Issues, 19(1), 72--88.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Jeantet (1998). Les objets intermédiaires dans la conception. Éléments pour une sociologie des processus de conception. Sociologie du travail, 3, p. 291--316.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Kirsh, D. (2010). Thinking with external representations. AI & Society, 25(4), 441--454.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Leclercq, P., & Elsen, C. (2007). Le croquis synthéé-numérique. Paper presented at the SCAN'05: Séminaire de Conception Architecturale Numérique, Paris, France.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. McCall, R., Vlahos, E., & Zabel, J. (2001). Conceptual design as hypersketching. Paper presented at the CAAD Futures 2001: Computer aided architectural design futures 2001Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Rodgers, P., Green, G., & McGown, A. (2000). Using concept sketches to track design progress. Design studies, 21, 451--464.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Safin, S., Delfosse, V., & Leclercq, P. (2010). Mixed-reality prototypes to support early creative design. In E. Dubois, P. Gray & L. Nigay (Eds.), The Engineering of Mixed Reality Systems. (pp. 419--445). London: Springer.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Schön, D. (1983). The reflexive practitioner: How professional think in action. New York: Basic Books.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. van de Vreken, A., & Safin, S. (2010). Influence du type de repréésentation visuelle sur l'évaluation de l'ambiance d'un espace architectural Paper presented at the IHM10: Conférence francophone sur l'interaction homme-machine. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    ECCE '16: Proceedings of the European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics
    September 2016
    193 pages
    ISBN:9781450342445
    DOI:10.1145/2970930

    Copyright © 2016 Owner/Author

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 5 September 2016

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • panel
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Acceptance Rates

    ECCE '16 Paper Acceptance Rate27of37submissions,73%Overall Acceptance Rate56of91submissions,62%
  • Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)1
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

    Other Metrics

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader