skip to main content
10.1145/2971485.2971520acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesnordichiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Participation Differences in Q&A Sites Across Countries: Opportunities for Cultural Adaptation

Authors Info & Claims
Published:23 October 2016Publication History

ABSTRACT

While the success of online Question & Answer (Q&A) sites relies on user contributions, previous work has shown that the number of contributions varies between countries. What remains unknown is whether this is due to a few people contributing a lot, or whether highly represented countries have a higher percentage of users who are willing to contribute. In this paper, we investigate this question with the goal of identifying opportunities to equalize contributions between countries. Analyzing the data from StackOverflow and Superuser, two popular Q&A sites, we find that the percentage of contributing users significantly varies between 116 countries, and that these differences can be partly explained by a country's national culture and overall English proficiency. We discuss how specific design decisions on these sites, such as the competitive reward mechanism used to encourage contributions, could be changed to encourage currently passive people to contribute.

References

  1. Aaker, J., and Maheswaran, D. The Effect of Cultural Orientation on Persuasion. Journal of Consumer Research 24 (1997), 315--328.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Ackerman, M. S., Dachtera, J., Pipek, V., and Wulf, V. Sharing Knowledge and Expertise: The CSCW View of Knowledge Management. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 22, 4--6 (2013), 531--573. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Adamic, L. A., Zhang, J., Bakshy, E., and Ackerman, M. S. Knowledge sharing and yahoo answers: everyone knows something. WWW '08, ACM (2008), 665--674. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Ardichvili, A., Maurer, M., Li, W., Wentling, T., and Stuedemann, R. Cultural influences on knowledge sharing through online communities of practice. Journal of Knowledge Management 10, 1 (2006).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Cohen, J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd Edition), 2 ed. Routledge, July 1988.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Dahl, S. Intercultural Research: The Current State of Knowledge. Social Science Research Network Working Paper Series (Feb. 2005).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. English First. EF English Proficiency Index Report, 2014. http://www.ef.edu/epi/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Fugelstad, P., Dwyer, P., Moses, J. F., Kim, J., Mannino, C. A., Terveen, L., and Snyder, M. What Makes Users Rate (Share, Tag, Edit...)?: Predicting Patterns of Participation in Online Communities. CSCW '12 (2012), 969--978. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Furtado, A., Andrade, N., Oliveira, N., and Brasileiro, F. Contributor Profiles, Their Dynamics, and Their Importance in Five Q&A Sites. CSCW '13 (2013), 1237--1252. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Gallagher, S. E., and Savage, T. Cross-cultural analysis in online community research: A literature review. Computers in Human Behavior 29, 3 (May 2013), 1028--1038. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Gao, G., Yamashita, N., Hautasaari, A. M., and Fussell, S. R. Improving multilingual collaboration by displaying how non-native speakers use automated transcripts and bilingual dictionaries. CHI '15 (2015). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Garcia-Gavilanes, R., Quercia, D., and Jaimes, A. Cultural Dimensions in Twitter: Time, Individualism and Power. ICWSM '13 (2013).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Hara, N., Shachaf, P., and Hew, K. F. Cross-cultural analysis of the Wikipedia community. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 61, 10 (Oct. 2010), 2097--2108. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Hofstede, G., Hofstede, G. J., and Minkov, M. Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind, Third Edition, 3 ed. McGraw-Hill, May 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Inglehart, R., and Baker, W. E. Modernization, Cultural Change, and the Persistence of Traditional Values. American Sociological Review 65, 1 (2000), 19--51.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Inglehart, R., and Oyserman, D. Individualism, Autonomy and Self-Expression: The Human Development Syndrome. In Comparing Cultures, Dimensions of Culture in a Comparative Perspective, H. Vinken, J. Soeters, and P. Ester, Eds. Brill Academic Pub, Leiden, The Netherlands, 2004, 74--96.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Karahanna, E., Evaristo, J. R., and Srite, M. Levels of culture and individual behavior: An integrative perspective. Advanced Topics in Global Information Management, Volume 5 (2006), 30.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Kayes, I., Kourtellis, N., Quercia, D., Iamnitchi, A., and Bonchi, F. Cultures in Community Question Answering. ACM HT'15 (2015). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Khaled, R., Barr, P., Biddle, R., Fischer, R., and Noble, J. Game Design Strategies for Collectivist Persuasion. Sandbox '09 (2009). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Kraut, R. E., and Resnick, P. Building Successful Online Communities: Evidence-Based Social Design. The MIT Press, Mar. 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Li, J. H., Chang, X. R., Lin, L., and Ma, L. Y. Meta-analytic comparison on the influencing factors of knowledge transfer in different cultural contexts. Journal of Knowledge Management 18, 2 (2014), 278--306.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Mamykina, L., Manoim, B., Mittal, M., Hripcsak, G., and Hartmann, B. Design lessons from the fastest Q&A site in the west. CHI '11 (2011), 2857--2866. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Mann, L., Radford, M., Burnett, P., Ford, S., Bond, M., Leung, K., Nakamura, H., Vaughan, G., and Yang, K.-S. Cross-cultural differences in self-reported decision-making style and confidence. International Journal of Psychology 33, 5 (1998), 325--335.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Marcus, A., and Gould, E. W. Crosscurrents: Cultural Dimensions and Global Web User-interface Design. Interactions 7, 4 (July 2000), 32--46. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Matsumoto, D., and Yoo, S. H. Toward a New Generation of Cross-Cultural Research. Perspectives on Psychological Science 1, 3 (Sept. 2006), 234--250.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Minkov, M., and Hofstede, G. Is National Culture a Meaningful Concept? Cross-Cultural Research 46, 2 (May 2012), 133--159.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Nam, K. K., Ackerman, M. S., and Adamic, L. A. Questions in, knowledge in?: a study of naver's question answering community. CHI '09 (2009), 779--788. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Pal, A., Chang, S., and Konstan, J. A. Evolution of Experts in Question Answering Communities. ICWSM '13 (2012).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Pfeil, U., Zaphiris, P., and Ang, C. S. Cultural differences in collaborative authoring of Wikipedia. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 12, 1 (Oct. 2006).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Quattrone, G., Mashhadi, A., and Capra, L. Mind the Map: The Impact of Culture and Economic Affluence on Crowd-mapping Behaviours. CSCW '14 (2014), 934--944. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Reinecke, K., Nguyen, M. K., Bernstein, A., Näf, M., and Gajos, K. Z. Doodle around the world: online scheduling behavior reflects cultural differences in time perception and group decision-making. CSCW '13 (2013), 45--54. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Schenk, D., and Lungu, M. Geo-locating the Knowledge Transfer in StackOverflow. SSE 2013 (2013). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Wikipedia. List of countries by english-speaking population, 2015. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_English-speaking_population Accessed 2015-12-07.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. World Bank. World bank indicators, 2011. http://data.worldbank.org/indicator.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Yang, J., Morris, M. R., Teevan, J., Adamic, L. A., and Ackerman, M. S. Culture matters: A survey study of social Q&A behavior. ICWSM '11 (2011).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Participation Differences in Q&A Sites Across Countries: Opportunities for Cultural Adaptation

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      NordiCHI '16: Proceedings of the 9th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction
      October 2016
      1045 pages
      ISBN:9781450347631
      DOI:10.1145/2971485

      Copyright © 2016 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 23 October 2016

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      NordiCHI '16 Paper Acceptance Rate58of231submissions,25%Overall Acceptance Rate379of1,572submissions,24%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader