skip to main content
10.1145/2971485.2971558acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesnordichiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Exploring Design Factors for Transforming Passive Vibration Signals into Smartwear Interactions

Authors Info & Claims
Published:23 October 2016Publication History

ABSTRACT

Vibrational signals that are generated when a finger is swept over an uneven surface can be reliably detected via low-cost sensors that are in proximity to the interaction surface. Such interactions provide an alternative to touchscreens by enabling always-available input. In this paper we demonstrate that Inertial Measurement Units (known as IMUs) embedded in many off-the-shelf smartwear are well suited for capturing vibrational signals generated by a user's finger swipes, even when the IMU appears in a smartring or smartwatch. In comparison to acoustic based approaches for capturing vibrational signals, IMUs are sensitive to a vast number of factors, both, in terms of the surface and swipe properties, when the interaction is carried out. We contribute by examining the impact of these surface and swipe properties, including surface or bump height and density, surface stability, sensor location, swipe style, and swipe direction. Based on our results, we present a number of usage scenarios to demonstrate how this approach can be used to provide always-available input for digital interactions.

References

  1. Avrahami, D., Wobbrock, J.O., and Izadi, S. Portico: tangible interaction on and around a tablet. In Proc. UIST 2011, ACM (2011), 347--356. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Chang, C.-C., and Lin, C.-J. LIBSVM: A library for support vector machines. ACM Trans. on Intelligent Systems and Technology, 2, 3, (2011), 27 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Gustafson, S., Holz, C., and Baudisch, P. Imaginary phone: learning imaginary interfaces by transferring spatial memory from a familiar device. In Proc. UIST 2011, ACM (2011), 283--292. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Harrison, C., Benko, H., and Wilson, A.D. OmniTouch: wearable multitouch interaction every-where. In Proc. UIST 2011, ACM (2011), 441--450. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Harrison, C. and Hudson, S.E. Scratch input: creating large, inexpensive, unpowered and mobile finger input surfaces. In Proc. UIST 2008, ACM (2008), 205--208. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Harrison, C., Tan, D., and Morris, D. Skinput: appropriating the body as an input surface. In Proc. CHI 2010, ACM (2010), 453--462. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Harrison, C., Xiao, R., and Hudson, S. Acoustic barcodes: passive, durable and inexpensive notched identification tags. In Proc. UIST 2012, ACM, 563--568. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Holz, C., Grossman, T., Fitzmaurice, G., and Agur, A. Implanted user interfaces. In Proc. CHI 2012, ACM (2012), 503--512. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Kane, S.K., Avrahami, D., Wobbrock, J.O., Harrison, B., Rea, A.D., Philipose, M., and LaMarca, A. 2009. Bonfire: a nomadic system for hybrid laptop-tabletop interaction. In Proc. UIST 2009, ACM (2009), 129--138. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Karrer, T., Wittenhagen, M., Lichtschlag, L., Heller, F., and Borchers, J. Pinstripe: eyes-free continuous input on interactive clothing. In Proc. CHI 2011, ACM (2011), 1313--1322. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Kim, J.E., Sunwoo, J., Son, Y.-K., Lee, D.-W. and Cho, I.-Y. A gestural input through finger writing on a textured pad. In Ext. Abstracts CHI 2007, ACM (2007), 2495--2500. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. McGrath, W. and Li, Y. Detecting tapping motion on the side of mobile devices by probabilistically combining hand postures. In Proc. UIST 2014, ACM (2014), 215--219. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Murray-Smith, R., Williamson, J., Hughes, S. and Quaade. T. Stane: synthesized surfaces for tactile input. In Proc. CHI 2008, ACM (2008), 1299--1302. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Ni, T. and Baudisch, P. Disappearing mobile devices. In Proc. UIST 2009, ACM (2009), 101--110. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Ono, M., Shizuki, B. and Tanaka, J. Touch & activate: adding interactivity to existing objects using active acoustic sensing. In Proc. UIST 2013, ACM (2013), 31--40. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Saponas, T., Harrison, C. and Benko, H. PocketTouch: through-fabric capacitive touch input. In Proc. UIST 2011. ACM (2011), 303--308. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Saponas, T., Tan, D., Morris, D., Balakrishnan, R., Turner, J. and Landay, J. Enabling always-available input with muscle-computer interfaces. In Proc. UIST 2009, ACM (2009), 167--176. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Sato, M., Poupyrev, I. and Harrison, C. Touché: enhancing touch interaction on humans, screens, liquids, and everyday objects. In Proc. CHI 2012. ACM (2012), 483--492. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Savage, V., Head, A., Hartmann, B., Goldman, D., Mysore, G. and Li, W. Lamello: Passive Acoustic Sensing for Tangible Input Components. In Proc. CHI 2015, ACM (2015), 1277--1280. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Sukhoy, V., Sahai, R., Sinapov, J., and Stoytchev, A. Vibrotactile recognition of surface textures by a humanoid robot. In Proc. Humanoids Workshop Tactile Sensing in Humanoids, 2009, pp. 57--60.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Wilson A.D., and Benko, H. Combining multiple depth cameras and projectors for interactions on, above and between surfaces. In Proc. UIST 2010. ACM, 273--282. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Wimmer, R. and Baudisch, P. Modular and deformable touch-sensitive surfaces based on time domain reflectometry. In Proc. UIST 2011, ACM (2011), 517--526. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Xiao, R., Lew, G., Marsanico, J., Hariharan, D., Hudson, S. and Harrison, C. Toffee: enabling ad hoc, around-device interaction with acoustic time-of-arrival correlation. In Proc. MobileHCI 2014, ACM (2014), 67--76. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Yang, X., Grossman, T., Wigdor, D. and Fitzmaurice, G. Magic finger: always-available input through finger instrumentation. In Proc. UIST 2012, ACM, 147--156. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Exploring Design Factors for Transforming Passive Vibration Signals into Smartwear Interactions

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      NordiCHI '16: Proceedings of the 9th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction
      October 2016
      1045 pages
      ISBN:9781450347631
      DOI:10.1145/2971485

      Copyright © 2016 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 23 October 2016

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      NordiCHI '16 Paper Acceptance Rate58of231submissions,25%Overall Acceptance Rate379of1,572submissions,24%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader