skip to main content
10.1145/2974804.2980490acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageshaiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
poster

Response Tendencies of Four-Year-Old Children to Communicative and Non-Communicative Robots

Published:04 October 2016Publication History

ABSTRACT

This study examined response tendencies in 4-year-old Japanese children (N = 45) to yes-no questions asked by a communicative, or a non-communicative robot. The children watched a video of a robot that was either responsive (communicative condition), or unresponsive (non-communicative condition) to human actions. Then, all the children watched a video of the same robot asking yes-no questions pertaining to familiar and unfamiliar objects. The children in both conditions exhibited a nay-saying bias to questions about unfamiliar objects, with children in the non-communicative condition tending to show a stronger nay-saying bias than children in the communicative condition. Children's response tendencies towards questions asked by humans and other agents are discussed.

References

  1. Arita, A., Hiraki, K., Kanda, T., & Ishiguro, H. (2005). Can we talk to robots? Ten-month-old infants expected interactive humanoid robots to be talked to by persons. Cognition, 95(3), B49-B57. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2004.08.001Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Fritzley, V. H., & Lee, K. (2003). Do young children always say yes to yes-no question? A metadevelopmental study of the affirmation bias. Child Development, 74(5), 1297--1313. doi:10.1111/1467--8624.00608Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Itakura, S., Ishida, H., Kanda, T., Shimada, Y., Ishiguro, H., & Lee, K. (2008). How to build an intentional android: Infants' imitation of a robot's goaldirected actions. Infancy, 13(5), 519--532. doi:10.1080/15250000802329503Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Kahn, P. H. J., Kanda, T., Ishiguro, H., Freie, N. G., Severson, R. L., Gill, B. T. (2012). "Robovie, You'll have to go into the closet now": Children's social and moral relationships with a humanoid robot. Developmental Psychology, 48(2), 303--314. doi:10.1037/a0027033.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Moriguchi, Y., Kanda, T., Ishiguro, H., & Itakura, S. (2010). Children perseverate to a human's actions but not to a robot's actions. Developmental Science, 13(1), 62--68. doi:10.1111/j.1467--7687.2009.00860.xGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Moriguchi, Y., Lee, K., & Itakura, S. (2007). Social transmission of disinhibition in young children. Developmental Science, 10(4), 481--491. doi:10.1111/j.1467--7687.2007.00601.xGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Moriguchi, Y., Okanda, M., & Itakura, S. (2008). Young children's yes bias: How does it relate to verbal ability, inhibitory control, and theory of mind? First Language, 28(4), 431--442. doi:10.1177/0142723708092413Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Okanda, M., & Itakura, S. (2007). Do Japanese children say 'yes' to their mothers? A naturalistic study of response bias in parent-toddler conversations. First Language, 27(4), 421--429. doi:10.1177/0142723707081653Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Okanda, M., & Itakura, S. (2008). Children in Asian cultures say yes to yes-no questions: Common and cultural differences between Vietnamese and Japanese children. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 32(2), 131--136. doi:10.1177/0165025407087211Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Okanda, M., & Itakura, S. (2010). When do children exhibit a "yes" bias? Child Development, 81(2), 568580. doi:10.1111/j.1467--8624.2009.01416.xGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Okanda, M., & Itakura, S. (2011). Do young and old preschoolers exhibit response bias due to different mechanisms? Investigating children's response time. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 110, 453460. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2011.04.012Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Okanda, M., Kanda, T., Ishiguro, H., & Itakura, S. (2013). Three- and 4-year-old children's r response tendencies to various interviewers. 116, 68--77. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2013.03.012Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Okanda, M., Somogyi, E., & Itakura, S. (2012). Differences in response bias among younger and older preschoolers: Investigating Japanese and Hungarian preschoolers. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 43(8), 1325--1338. doi:10.1177/0022022112440145Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Scheeff, M., Pinto, J., Rahardja, K., Snibbe, S., & Tow, R. (2002). Experiences with Sparky, a social robot. In K. Dautenhahn, A. Bond, L. Cañamero, & B. Edmonds (Eds.), Socially Intelligent Agents: Creating Relationships with Computers and Robots (Vol. 3, pp. 173--180.): Springer US.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Zelazo, P. D., Frye, D., & Rapus, T. (1996). An agerelated dissociation between knowing rules and using them. Cognitive Development, 11(1), 37--63. doi:10.1016/S0885-2014(96)90027--1Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Response Tendencies of Four-Year-Old Children to Communicative and Non-Communicative Robots

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      HAI '16: Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Human Agent Interaction
      October 2016
      414 pages
      ISBN:9781450345088
      DOI:10.1145/2974804

      Copyright © 2016 Owner/Author

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 4 October 2016

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • poster

      Acceptance Rates

      HAI '16 Paper Acceptance Rate29of182submissions,16%Overall Acceptance Rate96of336submissions,29%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader