skip to main content
10.1145/2983298.2983300acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmmConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Typographic Features on Distance Estimation with Head-Mounted Displays

Published:16 October 2016Publication History

ABSTRACT

An operator's capacity to correctly judge the distance of a word or text that appears combined with the physical environment is of utmost importance in Virtual Environments applications. In those cases, textual information tends to function as a visual anchor and when linked up with other 3D digital content, could potentially help to visually organize the space where the action takes place. With the increasing popularity of Head worn displays, home and work environments will soon benefit from more readable fonts that allow users to correctly estimate distances. The purpose of this article is to identify which visual properties a typeface should have in order the user to better estimate the distance related to the text when using a binocular HMD device. The laboratorial test present in this study shows that a flat and bi-dimensional font style performs better than a tri-dimensional and embossed font style.

References

  1. Fiorentino, M., Debernardis, S., Uva, A. E., and Monno, G. 2013. Augmented Reality Text Style Readability with See-Through Head-Mounted Displays in Industrial Context. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 22 (2), 171--190 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Donato, M. D., Fiorentino, M., Uva, A. E., Gattullo, M., and Monno, G. 2015. Text legibility for projected Augmented Reality on industrial workbenches. 70, pp. 70--78. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Yaniv, Z., and Linte, C. A. 2016. Applications of Augmented Reality in the Operating Room. In W. Barfield (Ed.), Fundamentals of Wearable Computers and Augmented Reality (2nd ed., pp. 485--510). New York: CRC Press Taylor & Francis Group.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Linte, C. A., Davenport, K. P., Cleary, K., Peters, C., Vosburgh, K. G., Navab, N., et al. 2013. On mixed reality environments for minimally invasive therapy guidance: Systems architecture, successes and challenges in their implementation from laboratory to clinic. Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics, 37(2), 83--97.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Sekuler, R., and Blake, R. 1994. Depth Perception. In J. Vaicunas & J. Akers (Eds.), Perception (3rd ed., pp. 141--179). Lisbon: McGraw-Hill International Editions.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Drascic, D., and Milgram, P. 1996. Perceptual Issues in Augmented Reality. In SPIE (Vol. 2653, pp. 123--134).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Vernon, M. D. 2013. A Further Study of Visual Perception: Cambridge University Press. ISBN: 9781107695535Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Jerome, C. J., and Witmer, B.G.. 2008 The Perception and Estimation of Egocentric Distance in Real and Augmented Reality Environments. ARMY RESEARCH INST FOR THE BEHAVIORAL AND SOCIAL SCIENCES ORLANDO FL.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Messing R., and Durgin F.H. 2005. Distance Perception and the Visual Horizon in Head-Mounted Displays. ACM Trans. Appl. Percept. 2, 3 (July 2005), 234--250. DOI=http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1077399.1077403. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Kuhl,S.A, Thompson,W.B., and Creem-Regehr,S.H. 2009. HMD calibration and its effects on distance judgments. ACM Trans. Appl. Percept. 6, 3, Article 19 (September 2009), 20 pages. DOI=http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1577755.1577762 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Kellner, F., Bolte,B., Bruder, G., Rautenberg, U., Steinicke, F., Lappe, M. and Koch, R. 2012. Geometric calibration of head-mounted displays and its effects on distance estimation, IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph., vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 589--596 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Typographic Features on Distance Estimation with Head-Mounted Displays

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          AltMM '16: Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Multimedia Alternate Realities
          October 2016
          48 pages
          ISBN:9781450345217
          DOI:10.1145/2983298

          Copyright © 2016 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 16 October 2016

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

          Acceptance Rates

          AltMM '16 Paper Acceptance Rate5of16submissions,31%Overall Acceptance Rate5of16submissions,31%

          Upcoming Conference

          MM '24
          MM '24: The 32nd ACM International Conference on Multimedia
          October 28 - November 1, 2024
          Melbourne , VIC , Australia

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader