skip to main content
10.1145/2983323.2983652acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescikmConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Query Answering Efficiency in Expert Networks Under Decentralized Search

Published:24 October 2016Publication History

ABSTRACT

Expert networks are formed by a group of expert-profes\-sionals with different specialties to collaboratively resolve specific queries. In such networks, when a query reaches an expert who does not have sufficient expertise, this query needs to be routed to other experts for further processing until it is completely solved; therefore, query answering efficiency is sensitive to the underlying query routing mechanism being used. Among all possible query routing mechanisms, decentralized search, operating purely on each expert's local information without any knowledge of network global structure, represents the most basic and scalable routing mechanism. However, there is still a lack of fundamental understanding of the efficiency of decentralized search in expert networks. In this regard, we investigate decentralized search by quantifying its performance under a variety of network settings. Our key findings reveal the existence of network conditions, under which decentralized search can achieve significantly short query routing paths (i.e., between O(log n) and O(log2 n) hops, n: total number of experts in the network). Based on such theoretical foundation, we then study how the unique properties of decentralized search in expert networks is related to the anecdotal small-world phenomenon. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first work studying fundamental behaviors of decentralized search in expert networks. The developed performance bounds, confirmed by real datasets, can assist in predicting network performance and designing complex expert networks.

References

  1. K. Balog, L. Azzopardi, and M. De Rijke, "Formal models for expert finding in enterprise corpora," in ACM SIGIR, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. P. Serdyukov, H. Rode, and D. Hiemstra, "Modeling multi-step relevance propagation for expert finding," in ACM CIKM, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Q. Shao, Y. Chen, S. Tao, X. Yan, and N. Anerousis, "Efficient ticket routing by resolution sequence mining," in ACM SIGKDD, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. H. Zhang, E. Horvitz, Y. Chen, and D. C. Parkes, "Task routing for prediction tasks," in AAMAS, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. G. Miao, L. E. Moser, X. Yan, S. Tao, Y. Chen, and N. Anerousis, "Generative models for ticket resolution in expert networks," in ACM SIGKDD, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. A. Banerjee and S. Basu, "A social query model for decentralized search," in ACM SNAKDD, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. J. Kleinberg and P. Raghavan, "Query incentive networks," in IEEE FOCS, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. J. Zeng and W. Hsu, "Optimal routing in a small-world network," Journal of Computer Science & Technology, vol. 21, pp. 476--481, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. H. Sun, M. Srivatsa, S. Tan, Y. Li, L. M. Kaplan, S. Tao, and X. Yan, "Analyzing expert behaviors in collaborative networks," in ACM SIGKDD, 2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. B. Bollobás and F. D. L. Vega, "The diameter of random regular graphs," Combinatorica, vol. 2, pp. 125--134, 1982.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. D. J. Watts and S. H. Strogatz, "Collective dynamics of 'small-world' networks," Nature, vol. 393, pp. 440--442, 1998.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. M. Draief and A. Ganesh, "Efficient routeing in poisson small-world networks," Journal of Applied Probability, pp. 678--686, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. L. A. Adamic, R. M. Lukose, A. R. Puniyani, and B. A. Huberman, "Search in power-law networks," Phys. Rev. E, vol. 64, p. 046135, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. S. Milgram, "The small world problem," Psychology Today, vol. 67, pp. 61--67, 1967.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. J. Travers and S. Milgram, "An experimental study of the small world problem," Sociometry, vol. 32, pp. 425--443, 1969.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. C. Korte and S. Milgram, "Acquaintance networks between racial groups: Application of the small world method," Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol. 15, pp. 101--108, 1970.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. J. Guare, Six Degrees of Separation: A Play. Vintage Books, 1990.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. J. Kleinberg, "The small-world phenomenon: An algorithmic perspective," in ACM STOC, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. L. Ma, "Query answering via decentralized search," Technical Report, IBM T. J. Watson Research Center, Yorktown, NY, USA, Jul 2016. {Online}. Available: http://researcher.ibm.com/researcher/files/us-maliang/QueryRoutingTR.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. J. Kleinberg, "Complex networks and decentralized search algorithms," in International Congress of Mathematicians, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Query Answering Efficiency in Expert Networks Under Decentralized Search

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Conferences
            CIKM '16: Proceedings of the 25th ACM International on Conference on Information and Knowledge Management
            October 2016
            2566 pages
            ISBN:9781450340731
            DOI:10.1145/2983323

            Copyright © 2016 ACM

            © 2016 Association for Computing Machinery. ACM acknowledges that this contribution was authored or co-authored by an employee, contractor or affiliate of the United States government. As such, the United States Government retains a nonexclusive, royalty-free right to publish or reproduce this article, or to allow others to do so, for Government purposes only.

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 24 October 2016

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • research-article

            Acceptance Rates

            CIKM '16 Paper Acceptance Rate160of701submissions,23%Overall Acceptance Rate1,861of8,427submissions,22%

            Upcoming Conference

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader