skip to main content
10.1145/2989293.2989307acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmswimConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

INLyD: Inter-Network-Layer Delay as a Low-cost Quality Metric for Multi-hop Routing in Wireless Mobile Networks

Authors Info & Claims
Published:13 November 2016Publication History

ABSTRACT

The need for authentic and effective portrayal of the spatio-temporally changing quality of wireless links has gained wide attention especially over the last decade. Software-based link quality estimators (LQE) classify links with help of packet reception ratio (PRR), required number of packet transmissions (RNP) and scoring/grading schemes that again utilize PRR, RNP or retransmission based heuristics. On the contrary, this paper makes a case for inter-network-layer delay as a classification metric to boost end-to-end packet delivery in multi-hop communication. In essence our Inter-Network-Layer Delay metric (INLyD) uses a simplistic receiver-side in-band signaling scheme to passively accumulate queuing, retrying, back-off, transmission and propagation delay statistics while generating no additional control packet overhead. Our experiments show that the INLyD metric is not only light-weight (25% less MAC transmissions required per node) but substantially outperforms proactive broadcast based estimation schemes in static and mobile scenarios (1.7 and 1.2 times more end-to-end UDP delivery respectively for the performed experiments).

References

  1. R.J. Ellison, D.A. Fisher, and R.C. Linger, "Survivable Network System: An Emerging Discipline". Technical Report, Carnegie Mellon University/SEI-97-TR-013, Carnegie Mellon University, 1997.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. M. Samuel, F. Michael, H. Joseph, W. Hong. "TAG: A tiny aggregation service for ad-hoc sensor networks". In OSDI. Citeseer, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. A. Jayasuriya, S. Perreau, A. Dadej, and S. Gordon. "Hidden vs exposed terminal problem in ad hoc networks." PhD dissertation, ATNAC 2004, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. A. T. Tran, and M. K. Kim, "Characteristics of ETX Link Quality Estimator Under High Traffic Load in Wireless Networks", 10th International Conference on High Performance Computing and Communications & 2013 IEEE International Conference on Embedded and Ubiquitous Computing HPCC_EUC 2013, pp.611,618, 13--15 Nov. 2013Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. D. Couto, D. Aguayo, J. Bicket and R. Morris, "A high-throughput path metric for multi-hop wireless routing", Wireless Networks, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 419--434, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. X. Ni, Performance evaluation of ETX on grid based wireless mesh networks, MPhil Thesis Report EET-UNSW. University of New South Wales, Australia, 2008Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. S.R. Afzal, M. Nabi, S. Stuijk and T. Basten, "Improving end-to-end packet delivery in high traffic multi-hop wireless ad hoc networks". In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Mobile Multimedia Communications, pp. 39--46, 2015. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. R. Fonseca, O. Gnawali, K. Jamieson, and P. Levis, "Four bit wireless link estimation," In Proceedings of the Sixth Workshop on Hot Topics in Networks (HotNets VI), 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Y.-C. Wu, Q. Chauhari and E. Serpedin, "Clock synchronization of wireless sensor networks," IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, vol. 28, pp. 124--138, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. G. Prakash, and E. Anand. "Indian News Media and Natural Calamities: Case of Chennai Floods." International Journal of Multidisciplinary Approach & Studies 3.2 (2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. OMNeT++ Network Simulation Framework, http://www. omnetpp.org/ {accessed June 2016}.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. INETMANET Extension for OMNET++, https://github.com/ inetmanet/inetmanet {accessed June 2016}.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. T. Camp, J. Boleng, and V. Davies. "A survey of mobility models for ad hoc network research." Wireless communications and mobile computing 2.5 (2002): 483--502.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. J. Zhao and R. Govindan. "Understanding packet delivery performance in dense wireless sensor networks." In the Proceedings First ACM Sensys Conference, November 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. M. G. C. Torres, "Energy Consumption In Wireless Sensor Networks using GSP," Dissertation, University of Pittsburgh, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. D. Johnson and D. Maltz, "Dynamic source routing in ad-hoc wireless networks." Proc. of SIGCOMM '96, Aug. 1996.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. N. Baccour, A. Koubaa., L. Mottola, M.A. Zuniga, H. Youssef, C.A. Boano and M. Alves, 2012. "Radio link quality estimation in wireless sensor networks: a survey." ACM Transactions on Sensor Networks (TOSN), 8(4), p.34. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. R. Draves, J.Padhye, and B.Zill, "Routing in multi-radio, multi-hop wireless mesh networks", in the proceedings of MobiCom 2004, pp.114--128. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. P. Pinto, A. Pinto, M. Ricardo, "End-to-end delay estimation using RPL metrics in WSN." In: IFIP Wireless Days (WD), pp. 1--6 (2013).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. A. Adya, P. Bahl, J. Padhye, A. Wolman, and L. Zhou. "A multi-radio unification protocol for IEEE 802.11 wireless networks." In Proceedings of Broadnets '04, pp. 344--354, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. K. S. Kim, C. Li, and E. Mondiano, "Scheduling multicast traffic with deadlines in wireless networks," Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. P. Jayachandran and M. Andrews, "Minimizing end-to-end delay in wireless networks using a coordinated edf schedule," in Proc. of IEEE INFOCOM, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. K. H. Kim and K. G. Shin, 2006. "On accurate measurement of link quality in multi-hop wireless mesh networks." In Proc. of the 12th Annual Int. Conf. on Mobile Computing and Networking (MobiCom '06). ACM, 38--49. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. D. Lal, A. Manjeshwar and F. Herrmann, 2003. "Measurement and characterization of link quality metrics in energy constrained wireless sensor networks." In Proc. of the IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference (Globecom '03). IEEE Communications Society, 446--452.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. S. M. Das, H. Pucha, K. Papagiannaki, and Y. C. Hu, "Studying wireless routing link metric dynamics," in Proceedings of ACM SIGCOMMIMC '07, October 2007, pp .327--332. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. INLyD: Inter-Network-Layer Delay as a Low-cost Quality Metric for Multi-hop Routing in Wireless Mobile Networks

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      PE-WASUN '16: Proceedings of the 13th ACM Symposium on Performance Evaluation of Wireless Ad Hoc, Sensor, & Ubiquitous Networks
      November 2016
      108 pages
      ISBN:9781450345057
      DOI:10.1145/2989293

      Copyright © 2016 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 13 November 2016

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • short-paper

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate70of240submissions,29%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader