skip to main content
10.1145/2992154.2992166acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesissConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Less Is More: Efficient Back-of-Device Tap Input Detection Using Built-in Smartphone Sensors

Published:06 November 2016Publication History

ABSTRACT

Back-of-device (BoD) interaction using current smartphone sensors (e.g. accelerometer, microphone, or gyroscope) has recently emerged as a promising novel input modality. Researchers have used a different number of features derived from these commodity sensors, however it is unclear what sensors and which features would allow for practical use, since not all sensor measurements have an equal value for detecting BoD interactions reliably and efficiently. In this paper, we primarily focus on constructing and selecting a subset of features that is a good predictor of BoD tap-based input while ensuring low energy consumption. As a result, we build several classifiers for a variety of use cases (e.g. single or double taps with the dominant or non-dominant hand). We show that a subset of just 5 features provides high discrimination power and results in high recognition accuracy. We also make our software publicly available, so that others can build upon our work.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

iss0141-file3.mp4

mp4

36.7 MB

References

  1. Baudisch, P., and Chu, G. Back-of-device interaction allows creating very small touch devices. In Proc. CHI (2009). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Corsten, C., Cherek, C., Karrer, T., and Borchers, J. HaptiCase: Back-of-device tactile landmarks for eyes-free absolute indirect touch. In Proc. CHI (2015). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. De Luca, A., von Zezschwitz, E., Nguyen, N. D. H., Maurer, M.-E., Rubegni, E., Scipioni, M. P., and Langheinrich, M. Back-of-device authentication on smartphones. In Proc. CHI (2013). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Gignac, G. E., and Vernon, P. A. Reaction time and the dominant and non-dominant hands: An extension of Hick's law. Personality and Individual Differences 36, 3 (2004).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Guyon, I., and Elisseeff, A. An introduction to variable and feature selection. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 3 (2003). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Hassan, N., Rahman, M., Irani, P., and Graham, P. Chucking: A one-handed document sharing technique. In Proc. INTERACT, vol. 5727 of LNCS. 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Hastie, T., Tibshirani, R., and Friedman, J. The Elements of Statistical Learning, 2nd ed. Springer-Verlag, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Heo, S., and Lee, G. ForceTap: extending the input vocabulary of mobile touch screens by adding tap gestures. In Proc. MobileHCI (2011). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Hinckley, K., and Song, H. Sensor synesthesia: touch in motion, and motion in touch. In Proc. CHI (2011). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Hirotaka, N. Reassessing current cell phone designs: using thumb input effectively. In Proc. CHI EA (2003). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Holman, D., Hollatz, A., Banerjee, A., and Vertegaal, R. Unifone: Designing for auxiliary finger input in one-handed mobile interactions. In Proc. TEI (2013). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Hudson, S. E., Harrison, C., Harrison, B. L., and LaMarca, A. Whack gestures: inexact and inattentive interaction with mobile devices. In Proc. TEI (2010). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Leiva, L. A., and Catalá, A. BoD Taps: An improved back-of-device authentication technique on smartphones. In Proc. MobileHCI (2014). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Lopes, P., Jota, R., and Jorge, J. A. Augmenting touch interaction through acoustic sensing. In Proc. ITS (2011). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Mohd Noor, M. F. Exploring back-of-device interaction. In Adj. Proc. UIST (2013). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Oakley, I., and Park, J. A motion-based marking menu system. In Proc. CHI EA (2007). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Proakis, J. G., and Manolakis, D. K. Digital Signal Processing, 4th ed. Prentice Hall, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Robinson, S., Rajput, N., Jones, M., Jain, A., Sahay, S., and Nanavati, A. TapBack: Towards richer mobile interfaces in impoverished contexts. In Proc. CHI (2011). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Roudaut, A., Baglioni, M., and Lecolinet, E. Timetilt: using sensor-based gestures to travel through multiple applications on a mobile device. In Proc. INTERACT, vol. 5726 of LNCS. 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Saeedi, R., Schimert, B., and Ghasemzadeh, H. Cost-sensitive feature selection for on-body sensor localization. In Adj. Proc. UbiComp (2014). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Seipp, K., and Devlin, K. BackPat: One-handed off-screen patting gestures. In Proc. MobileHCI (2014). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Serrano, M., Lecolinet, E., and Guiard, Y. Bezel-Tap gestures: Quick activation of commands from sleep mode on tablets. In Proc. CHI (2013). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Siegel, S., and Castellan, N. J. Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioural Sciences, 2nd ed. McGraw-Hill, 1988.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Zhang, C., Guo, A., Zhang, D., Southern, C., Arriaga, R., and Abowd, G. BeyondTouch: Extending the input language with built-in sensors on commodity smartphones. In Proc. IUI (2015). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Zhang, C., Parnami, A., Southern, C., Thomaz, E., Reyes, G., Arriaga, R., and Abowd, G. D. BackTap: Robust four-point tapping on the back of an off-the-shelf smartphone. In Adj. Proc. UIST (2013). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Zhang, L., Tiwana, B., Qian, Z., Wang, Z., Dick, R. P., Mao, Z. M., and Yang, L. Accurate online power estimation and automatic battery behavior based power model generation for smartphones. In Proc. CODES+ISSS (2010). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Less Is More: Efficient Back-of-Device Tap Input Detection Using Built-in Smartphone Sensors

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        ISS '16: Proceedings of the 2016 ACM International Conference on Interactive Surfaces and Spaces
        November 2016
        554 pages
        ISBN:9781450342483
        DOI:10.1145/2992154

        Copyright © 2016 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 6 November 2016

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        ISS '16 Paper Acceptance Rate33of119submissions,28%Overall Acceptance Rate147of533submissions,28%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader