skip to main content
research-article

Improving the Efficiency of an Online Marketplace by Incorporating Forgiveness Mechanism

Authors Info & Claims
Published:20 January 2017Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Reputation plays a key role in online marketplace communities improving trust among community members. Reputation works as a decision-making tool for understanding the behavior of the business partners. Success of any online business depends on the trust the business agents share with each other. However, untrustworthy agents have anno place in online marketplaces and are forced to leave the market even if they will potentially cooperate. In this study, we propose an exploration strategy based on a forgiveness mechanism for untrustworthy agents to recover their reputation. Furthermore, a number of experiments based on the NetLogo simulation are performed to validate the applicability of the proposed mechanism. The results show that the online marketplaces incorporating a forgiveness mechanism can be used with the existing reputation systems and improve the efficiency of online marketplaces.

References

  1. George A. Akerlof. 1970. The market for “lemons”: Quality uncertainty and the market mechanism. Quarter. J. Econ. 84, 3 (1970), 488--500.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Robert Axelrod. 1984. The Evolution of Cooperation. Basic Books, New York, NY.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Ruchdee Binmad and Mingchu Li. 2016. Computational models based on forgiveness mechanism for untrustworthy agents. In Intelligent and Evolutionary Systems, Kittichai Lavangnananda, Somnuk Phon-Amnuaisuk, Worrawat Engchuan, and Jonathan H. Chan (Eds.). Proceedings in Adaptation, Learning and Optimization, Vol. 5. Springer International Publishing, 29--42.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Susan D. Boon and Lorne M. Sulsky. 1997. Attributions of blame and forgiveness in romantic relationships: A policy-capturing study. J. Soc. Behav. Pers. 12 (1997), 19--26.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Sviatoslav Braynov and Tuomas Sandholm. 2002. Contracting with uncertain level of trust. Comput. Intell. 18, 4 (2002), 501--514.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Radu Burete, Amelia Bădică, and Costin Bădică. 2010. Reputation model with forgiveness factor for semi-competitive e-business agent societies. In Networked Digital Technologies. Springer, 402--416.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Radu Burete, Amelia Bădică, Costin Bădică, and Florin Moraru. 2011. Enhanced reputation model with forgiveness for e-business agents. Int. J. Agent Technol. Syst. 3, 2010 (2011), 11--26.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Saskia L. G. E. Burgers, Gert Jan Hofstede, Catholijn M. Jonker, and Tim Verwaart. 2010. Sensitivity analysis of an agent-based model of culture’s consequences for trade. Lect. Not. Econ. Math. Syst. 645 (2010), 253--264.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. J. L. Burnette, M. E. McCullough, D. R. Van Tongeren, and D. E. Davis. 2012. Forgiveness results from integrating information about relationship value and exploitation risk. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 38, 3 (2012), 345--356.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Arnold H. Buss. 1980. Self-Consciousness and Social Anxiety. Freeman.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. eBay. 2015. eBay: All about feedback. Retrieved from http://pages.ebay.com/help/feedback/allaboutfeedback. html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Julie Juola Exline, Everett L. Worthington, Peter Hill, and Michael E. McCullough. 2003. Forgiveness and justice: A research agenda for social and personality psychology. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Rev. 7, 4 (2003), 337--348.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Diego Gambetta. 2000. Can we trust trust? Trust: Making and Breaking Cooperative Relations (2000), 213--237.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Francesca Giardini, Rosaria Conte, and Paolucci Mario. 2013. Reputation. In Simulating Social Complexity: A Handbook, Bruce Edmonds and Ruth Meyer (Eds.). Springer, 365--399.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Nigel Gilbert. 2008. Agent-Based Models. SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Nathan Griffiths. 2006. A fuzzy approach to reasoning with trust, distrust and insufficient trust. In Cooperative Information Agents X, Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer, 360--374. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Michael P. Haselhuhn, Maurice E. Schweitzer, and Alison M. Wood. 2010. How implicit beliefs influence trust recovery. Psychol. Sci. 21, 5 (2010), 645--648.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Trung Dong Huynh, Nicholas R. Jennings, and Nigel R. Shadbolt. 2006. An integrated trust and reputation model for open multi-agent systems. Auton. Agents Multi-Agent Syst. 13 (2006), 119--154. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Gerald G. Jampolsky. 2011. Forgiveness: The Greatest Healer of All. Simon 8 Schuster.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Johan C. Karremans, Paul A. M. Van Lange, and Rob W Holland. 2005. Forgiveness and its associations with prosocial thinking, feeling, and doing beyond the relationship with the offender. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 31, 10 (2005), 1315--1326.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Laura B. Luchies, Eli J. Finkel, James K. McNulty, and Madoka Kumashiro. 2010. The doormat effect: When forgiving erodes self-respect and self-concept clarity. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 98, 5 (2010), 734--749.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Gregory R. Maio, Geoff Thomas, Frank D. Fincham, and Katherine B. Carnelley. 2008. Unraveling the role of forgiveness in family relationships. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 94, 2 (2008), 307--319.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Zaki Malik and Athman Bouguettaya. 2009. Reputation bootstrapping for trust establishment among web services. IEEE Internet Computing 13, 1 (2009), 40--47. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Stephen Marsh and Pamela Briggs. 2009. Examining trust, forgiveness and regret as computational concepts. In Computing with Social Trust, Jennifer Golbeck (Ed.). Springer, 9--43.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Michael E. McCullough, Kenneth I. Pargament, and Carl E. Thoresen. 2001. Forgiveness: Theory, Research, and Practice. Guilford Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. M. E. McCullough, K. C. Rachal, S. J. Sandage, E. L. Worthington, S. W. Brown, and T. L. Hight. 1998. Interpersonal forgiving in close relationships: II. Theoretical elaboration and measurement. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 75, 6 (1998), 1586--1603.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. NetLogo. 2015. NetLogo Models Library. (2015). Retrieved from http://ccl.northwestern.edu/netlogo/models/ index.cgi.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Amy K. Smith, Ruth N. Bolton, and Janet Wagner. 1999. A model of customer satisfaction with service encounters involving failure and recovery. J. Market. Res. 36 (1999), 356--372.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Mozhgan Tavakolifard and Kevin C. Almeroth. 2012. Social computing: An intersection of recommender systems, trust/reputation systems, and social networks. IEEE Network 26, 4 (2012), 53--58.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. WT Teacy, Georgios Chalkiadakis, Alex Rogers, and Nicholas R. Jennings. 2008. Sequential decision making with untrustworthy service providers. In Proceedings of the 7th International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-agent Systems-Volume 2. International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, 755--762. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Asimina Vasalou, Astrid Hopfensitz, and Jeremy V. Pitt. 2008. In praise of forgiveness: Ways for repairing trust breakdowns in one-off online interactions. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud. 66 (2008), 466--480. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Asimina Vasalou and Jeremy Pitt. 2005. Reinventing forgiveness: A formal investigation of moral facilitation. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Trust Management, Vol. 3477. 146--160. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Asimina Vasalou, Jeremy Pitt, and Guillaume Piolle. 2006. From theory to practice: Forgiveness as a mechanism to repair conflicts in CMC. In Trust Management. Vol. 3986. Springer, 397--411. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Yao Wang and Julita Vassileva. 2007. Toward trust and reputation based web service selection: A survey. Int. Trans. Syst. Sci. Appl. 3, 2 (2007), 118--132.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Michael Wenzel and Tyler G. Okimoto. 2010. How acts of forgiveness restore a sense of justice: Addressing status/power and value concerns raised by transgressions. Eur. J. Soc. Psychol. 40, 3 (2010), 401--417.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Uri Wilensky. 1999. NetLogo. Retrieved from http://ccl.northwestern.edu/netlogo/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Yi Xie and Siqing Peng. 2009. How to repair customer trust after negative publicity: The roles of competence, integrity, benevolence, and forgiveness. Psychol. Market. 26, 7 (2009), 572--589.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  38. Hong Zhang, HaiXin Duan, and Wu Liu. 2008. RRM: An incentive reputation model for promoting good behaviors in distributed systems. Sci. Chin. Ser. F: Inform. Sci. 51, 11 (2008), 1871--1882.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Improving the Efficiency of an Online Marketplace by Incorporating Forgiveness Mechanism

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in

        Full Access

        • Published in

          cover image ACM Transactions on Internet Technology
          ACM Transactions on Internet Technology  Volume 17, Issue 1
          Special Issue on Affect and Interaction in Agent-based Systems and Social Media and Regular Paper
          February 2017
          213 pages
          ISSN:1533-5399
          EISSN:1557-6051
          DOI:10.1145/3036639
          • Editor:
          • Munindar P. Singh
          Issue’s Table of Contents

          Copyright © 2017 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 20 January 2017
          • Accepted: 1 September 2016
          • Revised: 1 August 2016
          • Received: 1 November 2015
          Published in toit Volume 17, Issue 1

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article
          • Research
          • Refereed

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader