skip to main content
10.1145/2996913.2997010acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesgisConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

Location corroborations by mobile devices without traces

Published:31 October 2016Publication History

ABSTRACT

A location corroboration of a person is a proof, in the form of a digital record, indicating that this person was at a particular place at a given time. That is, given a user u, a location l and a time t, a location corroboration is a certified evidence that u was at location l at time t. Such corroborations can be used in legal procedures, help solving personal disputes or enable services that rely on knowing with certainty the location of a user at a given time. A corroboration without traces means that the user location is not stored in any public server or in any other public entity, to protect the user privacy. In this paper we present the problem of producing a location corroboration without traces, using a mobile device, and we discuss possible solutions to it.

References

  1. J. T. Biehl, A. J. Lee, G. Filby, and M. Cooper. You're where? prove it!: Towards trusted indoor location estimation of mobile devices. In Proc. of the 2015 ACM International Joint Conf. on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing, pages 909--919, 2015. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. D. Gafurov, K. Helkala, and T. Søndrol. Biometric gait authentication using accelerometer sensor. Journal of computers, 1(7):51--59, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. W. He, X. Liu, and M. Ren. Location cheating: A security challenge to location-based social network services. In Proc. of the 2011 31st International Conf. on Distributed Computing Systems, pages 740--749. IEEE Computer Society, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. R. Joyce and G. Gupta. Identity authentication based on keystroke latencies. Commun. ACM, 33(2):168--176, 1990. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. B. Krishnamurthy and C. E. Wills. Characterizing privacy in online social networks. In Proc. of the 1st ACM Workshop on Online Social Networks, pages 37--42, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. B. Krishnamurthy and C. E. Wills. On the leakage of personally identifiable information via online social networks. In Proc. of the 2nd ACM Workshop on Online Social Networks, pages 7--12. ACM, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. J. Krumm. Inference attacks on location tracks. In International Conf. on Pervasive Computing, pages 127--143. Springer, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. M. Lei, X. Hong, and S. V. Vrbsky. Protecting location privacy with dynamic mac address exchanging in wireless networks. In IEEE GLOBECOM 2007-IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference, pages 49--53. IEEE, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. J. Mahmud, J. Nichols, and C. Drews. Home location identification of twitter users. ACM Trans. Intell. Syst. Technol., 5(3):47:1--47:21, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. M. Miettinen, N. Asokan, F. Koushanfar, T. D. Nguyen, J. Rios, A.-R. Sadeghi, M. Sobhani, and S. Yellapantula. I know where you are: Proofs of presence resilient to malicious provers. In Proc. of the 10th ACM Symposium on Information, Computer and Communications Security, pages 567--577. ACM, 2015. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. F. Monrose and A. D. Rubin. Keystroke dynamics as a biometric for authentication. Future Generation computer systems, 16(4):351--359, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. I. Polakis, S. Volanis, E. Athanasopoulos, and E. P. Markatos. The man who was there: Validating check-ins in location-based services. In Proc. of the 29th Annual Computer Security Applications Conference, pages 19--28. ACM, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. R. Rivest. The MD5 message-digest algorithm, 1992.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. R. L. Rivest, A. Shamir, and L. Adleman. A method for obtaining digital signatures and public-key cryptosystems. Commun. ACM, 21(2):120--126, 1978. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. S. Saroiu and A. Wolman. Enabling new mobile applications with location proofs. In Proc. of the 10th Workshop on Mobile Computing Systems and Applications, pages 3:1--3:6. ACM, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. J. S. Warner and R. G. Johnston. A simple demonstration that the global positioning system (GPS) is vulnerable to spoofing. Journal of Security Administration, 25(2):19--27, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. J. Wayman, A. Jain, D. Maltoni, and D. Maio. An introduction to biometric authentication systems. Springer, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Location corroborations by mobile devices without traces

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        SIGSPACIAL '16: Proceedings of the 24th ACM SIGSPATIAL International Conference on Advances in Geographic Information Systems
        October 2016
        649 pages
        ISBN:9781450345897
        DOI:10.1145/2996913

        Copyright © 2016 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 31 October 2016

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • short-paper

        Acceptance Rates

        SIGSPACIAL '16 Paper Acceptance Rate40of216submissions,19%Overall Acceptance Rate220of1,116submissions,20%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader