ABSTRACT
Many location-based dating applications allow users to search for potential matches who are physically proximate. A recent mobile dating application, happn, adds a temporal dimension to location-based dating, showing users the number of times that they crossed path with each other, as well as the location of the most recent overlap. We conducted qualitative interviews with 15 happn users to understand how people make sense of crossed paths, and assess the meanings they assign to these location overlaps. Building on Uncertainty Reduction Theory, we show the various outcomes of the crossed paths and how they play a role in uncertainty reduction. In particular, the warranting power of the device-driven location data was accepted as valuable, and generated little concern about misrepresentation. Moreover, people assigned significant meaning to the minimal cues available from the overlap data. In addition, the location overlap data was useful in allowing users to estimate convenience in meeting and establish common ground. On the other hand, concerns of security and recognition by known others persisted in the happn app. Our findings suggest the potential for utilizing location data outside of the domain of online dating.
- Louise Barkhuus, Barry Brown, Marek Bell, Scott Sherwood, Malcolm Hall, and Matthew Chalmers. 2008. From Awareness to Repartee: Sharing Location Within Social Groups. In Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '08). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 497--506. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Charles R Berger and Richard J Calabrese. 1975. Some explorations in initial interaction and beyond: Toward a developmental theory of interpersonal communication. Human Communication Research 1, 2 (1975), 99--112.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Mark Bilandzic and Daniel Johnson. 2013. Hybrid placemaking in the library: designing digital technology to enhance users' on-site experience. The Australian Library Journal 62, 4 (2013), 258--271.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Mark Bilandzic, Ronald Schroeter, and Marcus Foth. 2013. Gelatine: Making Coworking Places Gel for Better Collaboration and Social Learning. In Proceedings of the Australian Computer-Human Interaction Conference: Augmentation, Application, Innovation, Collaboration (OzCHI '13). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 427--436. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jeremy Birnholtz, Colin fitzpatrick, Mark Handel, and Jed R Brubaker. 2014. Identity, identification and identifiability: the language of self-presentation on a location-based mobile dating app. In Proceedings of the Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices & Services (MobileHCI '14). ACM, 3--12. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Courtney Blackwell, Jeremy Birnholtz, and Charles Abbott. 2014. Seeing and being seen: Co-situation and impression formation using Grindr, a location-aware gay dating app. New Media & Society (2014), 1461444814521595.Google Scholar
- Dale E. Brashers. 2001. Communication and Uncertainty Management. Journal of Communication 51, 3 (2001), 477--497.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Tiago Camacho, Marcus Foth, and Andry Rakotonirainy. 2013. Trainroulette: promoting situated in-train social interaction between passengers. In Proceedings of the Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing Adjunct Publication (UbiComp '13). ACM, 1385--1388. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Sunny Consolvo, Ian E Smith, Tara Matthews, Anthony LaMarca, Jason Tabert, and Pauline Powledge. 2005. Location disclosure to social relations: why, when, & what people want to share. In Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '05). ACM, 81--90. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Elena Francesca Corriero and Stephanie Tom Tong. 2016. Managing uncertainty in mobile dating applications: Goals, concerns of use, and information seeking in Grindr. Mobile Media & Communication 4, 1 (2016), 121--141.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Danielle Couch and Pranee Liamputtong. 2007. Online dating and mating: Perceptions of risk and health among online users. Health, Risk & Society 9, 3 (2007), 275--294.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Henriette Cramer, Mattias Rost, and Lars Erik Holmquist. 2011. Performing a Check-in: Emerging Practices, Norms and 'Conflicts' in Location-sharing Using Foursquare. In Proceedings of the Conference on Human Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services (MobileHCI '11). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 57--66. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Judith Donath. 2007. Signals in social supernets. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 13, 1 (2007), 231--251. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Nicole B Ellison, Jeffrey T Hancock, and Catalina L Toma. 2012. Profile as promise: A framework for conceptualizing veracity in online dating self-presentations. New Media & Society 14, 1 (2012), 45--62.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Jennifer L Gibbs, Nicole B Ellison, and Chih-Hui Lai. 2010. first comes love, then comes Google: An investigation of uncertainty reduction strategies and self-disclosure in online dating. Communication Research (2010), 0093650210377091.Google Scholar
- Catherine Grevet and Eric Gilbert. 2015. Piggyback Prototyping: Using Existing, Large-Scale Social Computing Systems to Prototype New Ones. In Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 4047--4056. Google ScholarDigital Library
- William B Gudykunst. 1985. The influence of cultural similarity, type of relationship, and self-monitoring on uncertainty reduction processes. Communications Monographs 52, 3 (1985), 203--217.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Jeffrey T. Hancock, Catalina Toma, and Nicole Ellison. 2007. The Truth About Lying in Online Dating Profiles. In Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '07). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 449--452. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Mark J. Handel and Irina Shklovski. 2012. Disclosure, Ambiguity and Risk Reduction in Real-time Dating Sites. In Proceedings of the Conference on Supporting Group Work (GROUP '12). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 175--178. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Lee Humphreys. 2007. Mobile Social Networks and Social Practice: A Case Study of Dodgeball. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 13, 1 (2007), 341--360. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Giovanni Iachello, Ian Smith, Sunny Consolvo, Mike Chen, and Gregory D. Abowd. 2005. Developing Privacy Guidelines for Social Location Disclosure Applications and Services. In Proceedings of the 2005 Symposium on Usable Privacy and Security (SOUPS '05). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 65--76. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Yong Gu Ji, Hwan Hwangbo, Ji Soo Yi, PL Patrick Rau, Xiaowen Fang, and Chen Ling. 2010. The influence of cultural differences on the use of social network services and the formation of social capital. Intl. Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 26, 11--12 (2010), 1100--1121.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Julia M. Mayer, Starr Roxanne Hiltz, and Quentin Jones. 2015. Making Social Matching Context-Aware: Design Concepts and Open Challenges. In Proceedings of the 33rd Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 545--554. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Miller McPherson, Lynn Smith-Lovin, and James M Cook. 2001. Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology (2001), 415--444.Google Scholar
- Matthias R Mehl, Samuel D Gosling, and James W Pennebaker. 2006. Personality in its natural habitat: manifestations and implicit folk theories of personality in daily life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 90, 5 (2006), 862.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Stanley Milgram. 1974. The experience of living in cities. Crowding and Behavior 167 (1974), 41.Google Scholar
- Stanley Milgram. 1977. The familiar stranger: An aspect of urban anonymity. The Individual in a Social World (1977), 51--53.Google Scholar
- Helen Nissenbaum. 2004. Privacy as contextual integrity. Wash. L. Rev. 79 (2004), 119.Google Scholar
- Gregory Norcie, Emiliano De Cristofaro, and Victoria Bellotti. 2013. Bootstrapping trust in online dating: Social verification of online dating profiles. In financial Cryptography and Data Security. Springer, 149--163.Google Scholar
- Sameer Patil, Gregory Norcie, Apu Kapadia, and Adam Lee. 2012. "Check out Where I Am!": Location-sharing Motivations, Preferences, and Practices. In CHI '12 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '12). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1997--2002. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Mattias Rost, Louise Barkhuus, Henriette Cramer, and Barry Brown. 2013. Representation and Communication: Challenges in Interpreting Large Social Media Datasets. In Proceedings of the 2013 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW '13). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 357--362. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Raz Schwartz. 2013. The Networked Familiar Stranger : An Aspect of Online and Offline Urban Anonymity. Mobile media practices, presence and politics : the challenge of being seamlessly mobile (2013).Google Scholar
- Raz Schwartz and Germaine R Halegoua. 2014. The spatial self: Location-based identity performance on social media. New Media & Society (2014).Google Scholar
- Georg Simmel. 1950 (Original work published in 1903). The metropolis and mental life. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
- Daniel M. Sutko and Adriana de Souza e Silva. 2011. Location-aware mobile media and urban sociability. New Media & Society 13, 5 (2011), 807--823.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Catalina L. Toma, Jeffrey T. Hancock, and Nicole B. Ellison. 2008. Separating Fact From fiction: An Examination of Deceptive Self-Presentation in Online Dating Profiles. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 34, 8 (2008), 1023--1036.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Joseph B Walther. 1996. Computer-Mediated Communication: Impersonal, Interpersonal, and Hyperpersonal Interaction. Communication Research 23, 1 (1996), 3--43.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Joseph B Walther. 2007. Selective self-presentation in computer-mediated communication: Hyperpersonal dimensions of technology, language, and cognition. Computers in Human Behavior 23, 5 (2007), 2538--2557. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Joseph B Walther and Malcolm R Parks. 2002. Cues filtered out, cues filtered in. Handbook of interpersonal communication (2002), 529--563.Google Scholar
- Joseph B Walther, Brandon Van Der Heide, Lauren M Hamel, and Hillary C Shulman. 2009. Self-generated versus other-generated statements and impressions in computer-mediated communication: A test of warranting theory using Facebook. Communication Research 36, 2 (2009), 229--253.Google ScholarCross Ref
Index Terms
- What Happens in Happn: The Warranting Powers of Location History in Online Dating
Recommendations
Learning Location Correlation from GPS Trajectories
MDM '10: Proceedings of the 2010 Eleventh International Conference on Mobile Data ManagementPeople’s location histories imply the location correlation that states the relations between geographical locations in the space of human behavior. With the correlation, we can enable many valuable services, such as location recommendation and sales ...
Mining correlation between locations using human location history
GIS '09: Proceedings of the 17th ACM SIGSPATIAL International Conference on Advances in Geographic Information SystemsThe advance of location-acquisition technologies enables people to record their location histories with spatio-temporal datasets, which imply the correlation between geographical regions. This correlation indicates the relationship between locations in ...
Recommending friends and locations based on individual location history
The increasing availability of location-acquisition technologies (GPS, GSM networks, etc.) enables people to log the location histories with spatio-temporal data. Such real-world location histories imply, to some extent, users' interests in places, and ...
Comments